This paper examines Ishmael Beah's memoir about his experiences as a child soldier in Sierra Leone, using it as a lens to explore what measures could prevent youth participation in international armed conflict. The analysis covers multiple dimensions of responsibility: the failures of the Sierra Leone government, the role of the international diamond trade in fueling conflict, the absence of Western media coverage, inadequate military oversight, and the limited intervention by the United Nations. The paper argues that a combination of governmental accountability, consumer awareness around "blood diamonds," media attention, and stronger UN sanctions could have prevented the exploitation of children like Beah.
The paper demonstrates the use of a literary primary source (a memoir) as evidence for a policy argument. Rather than treating the memoir purely as a narrative text, the writer extracts quotations to substantiate sociopolitical claims, showing how personal testimony can function alongside analytical argument in an essay.
The essay opens with context about Beah's memoir and moves systematically through six areas of concern: governmental corruption, the diamond trade, media silence, military misconduct, UN inaction, and rehabilitation. Each section follows a similar pattern — identifying a systemic failure, citing evidence from the text or a reviewer, and recommending a preventive measure. The paper closes by noting Beah's eventual rehabilitation, offering a cautiously hopeful resolution.
A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier by Ishmael Beah is a firsthand account of life as a child combatant in Sierra Leone. Beah became a child soldier at the age of twelve, and his memoir makes a powerful case for why the international community must act to prevent youth participation in armed conflict.
Beah's experiences are harrowing, particularly for someone so young. He writes, "The bullets could be seen sticking out just a little bit in the baby's body, and she was swelling" (Beah 26). No one should have to witness such things, let alone a twelve-year-old child. At the heart of the fighting in Sierra Leone is the diamond mining industry, which rebel groups sought to control. This is at least partly a failure of the Sierra Leone government, which allowed rival rebel factions to seize territory and terrorize the population for years.
The government of Sierra Leone was weak and corrupt, and it failed the children who — like Beah — were conscripted to fight. Those children had little real choice: they had no homes, no families, and faced death if they refused. As one reviewer notes, "In Beah's wartime view, the rebels either destroyed your village or they're about to. It's not hard to understand Beah's decision to fight, though, as it wasn't much of a decision" (Dicker 7). Killing became their only means of survival, and Beah's experiences should never be visited upon a child of his age — or upon anyone.
The government could have done far more to protect civilians and repel rebel forces. Its failure to do so makes it directly culpable, and it must be held accountable. Strengthening state institutions and establishing rule of law are essential first steps toward preventing the conditions that produce child soldiers.
Another important measure is regulating the diamond industry in the poorest countries of Africa, where corruption and armed conflict are widespread. Diamonds represent wealth and power, and many factions compete violently to control them. Because diamond extraction in many regions lacks effective governmental or corporate oversight, it is vulnerable to corruption, smuggling, and theft. All of these problems are present in Sierra Leone, and it is ultimately global consumer demand that fuels them.
Today, more people are aware of the origins of conflict diamonds — sometimes called "blood diamonds" — and refuse to purchase them. However, many consumers still do not know or do not care where their diamonds come from or under what conditions they were mined, and this indifference perpetuates the circumstances that shaped Beah's story. Educating consumers, supporting certification schemes such as the Kimberley Process, and boycotting diamonds from conflict zones could help reverse situations like the one Beah experienced. Raising public awareness remains a vital tool.
You’re 41% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.