This paper evaluates the costs and benefits of regional integration, with particular focus on China's position within the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) bloc. It examines economic advantages such as increased trade, specialization, economies of scale, and improved competition, as well as non-economic benefits including enhanced regional security and cooperative governance reform. The paper then argues that these benefits are outweighed by significant drawbacks: the erosion of national sovereignty, exposure to politically unstable member states, the moral hazard of fiscal bailouts, and the economic inefficiency caused by trade diversion. The analysis concludes that regional integration presents a contradictory doctrine that may not serve China's long-term national interests.
Regional integration is beneficial, as it allows for greater trade, which in turn offers a number of advantages. With economic growth comes an improvement in living standards, as nations are better able to specialize and trade, bringing greater aggregate output to the bloc as a whole. For China in particular, it can trade manufactured goods for minerals, energy, and food. The trade gains bring about improved, more efficient competition and thereby increased returns. The improved competition also facilitates this increase in output.
In addition to the economic benefits, regional integration leads to improved levels of non-economic cooperation as well. In order to compete more effectively, nations will gravitate towards the most effective internal policies. Countries will also put pressure on one another to implement reforms that improve internal governance (SARPN, 2005). Regionalization also helps to improve regional security. As nations become dependent on one another within a large bloc, that increased level of cooperation is likely to discourage open conflict between members (Ibid).
In addition, nations within the bloc have greater bargaining power compared with nations that operate outside it. The oldest major bloc, the European Union, is a good example of this bargaining power. By acting as a single economic unit, Europe is able to function as one of the largest markets in the world, allowing companies to enjoy continent-wide economies of scale. This works to the benefit of all members, as most individual nations would not enjoy such economies of scale on their own. While China would enjoy significant economies regardless, other APEC nations — Brunei, for example — would not. The benefits, however, accrue to all members, especially in a bloc the size of APEC.
Whatever advantages there might be to regional integration, there are numerous downsides, and these outweigh the benefits. For example, regional integration effectively cedes a degree of sovereignty to the will of other nations. China is in a position where its economic miracle has been built through an economy of its own design. Many APEC nations, however, operate with completely different economic philosophies. China should not be compelled to bend to the will of these nations, yet within the framework of multilateral negotiation this might be the case. China has a number of issues on which it is determined not to yield to Western pressure, but entering into a group like APEC opens the door for other nations to gain leverage over China's internal policy.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.