Essay Undergraduate 785 words

China's Currency Policy and the U.S. Trade Deficit

~4 min read
Abstract

This paper examines three interrelated questions about China's currency policy and its effects on the U.S. economy. First, it argues that a significant yuan revaluation would ultimately benefit American consumers by reducing dependence on consumer credit and restoring balance to global trade. Second, it contends that China is not solely to blame for the U.S. current account deficit, since American consumer demand and retailer behavior drive the search for low-cost imports regardless of the supplying country. Third, it advocates for an aggressive legislative posture — including tariffs, sanctions, and anti-dumping measures — as the most effective means of pressuring China to alter its currency policy, while noting that such measures are only meaningful if backed by genuine political will.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper tackles a multi-part economic question in a structured, numbered format, making its argument flow transparent and easy to follow.
  • It uses historical analogies — comparing China to Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Korea in earlier decades — to ground its claims in precedent rather than speculation.
  • It acknowledges counterarguments (e.g., that U.S. consumer behavior, not China alone, drives the deficit) before asserting a policy position, lending intellectual balance to the analysis.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates multi-perspective economic analysis: it first evaluates the macroeconomic effects of yuan revaluation on consumers, then recasts the blame question by examining demand-side drivers, and finally translates both insights into a concrete policy recommendation. This layered approach — moving from economic diagnosis to policy prescription — is a hallmark of applied economics writing.

Structure breakdown

The paper is organized around three discrete analytical questions, each forming its own section. The first addresses long-run consumer welfare effects of revaluation. The second challenges the causal narrative that pins the trade deficit on China. The third evaluates policy options, distinguishing between WTO mechanisms and legislative/tariff-based approaches, and closes with a pragmatic caution about political will. A bibliography of five sources follows.

Introduction: Yuan Revaluation and American Consumers

If the Chinese government revalues the yuan by 20% or more, this would in the long run be a desirable outcome for American consumers. The present situation is not as sustainable for Americans as it is for the Chinese. The Chinese have established their exchange rate as a source of long-term competitive advantage, but this artificial construct distorts the market. With a seemingly boundless source of cheap labor and land, China can maintain the artificial rate for a long time. However, the cost of this is being borne by the American consumer.

The current account deficit with China is fueled largely by the explosion in consumer debt in the United States. This high level of consumer debt has stretched U.S. consumers to their limits, such that any shock can have a devastating impact on the economy, as the subprime crisis demonstrated. Ultimately, the U.S. consumer needs to begin scaling back their dependence on credit for the overall health of both the U.S. and world economies. Domestic policy considerations aside, higher prices on Chinese imports can help drive this change by forcing reduced U.S. consumption.

Long-Term Benefits of Currency Realignment

China's resulting loss in competitiveness from a yuan revaluation would benefit other emerging economies. This, along with a reduction in the U.S. current account deficit with China, would provide greater balance to the world's economic order — a desirable outcome in its own right. In the long run, it would likely produce a positive outcome for China as well, since the country would be forced to compete less on price and more on quality.

As seen with Japan and South Korea, transitioning from price-based to quality-based competition is the final stage in moving an economy from the emerging stage to the developed stage. China has already begun entering this stage, with some factories becoming highly automated (Bradsher, 2005).

China's Role in the U.S. Current Account Deficit

China should not be blamed entirely for the U.S. current account deficit, the flood of imports, or downward wage pressures. There are a hundred other developing countries that would gladly take China's place as the provider of choice for low-cost consumer goods (Kirchhoff, 2005). U.S. consumers and retailers are constantly seeking lower costs and higher margins, respectively, and this demand has created the conditions for such trade. Before China, it was Korea, Taiwan, and Japan that filled this role — and indeed, the same arguments were made in the 1970s with respect to Japan (McKinnon, 2001).

The problem is that U.S. consumers and retailers — beholden to shareholders and the pressure to satisfy markets every quarter — are easily dazzled by the estimated $600 billion in savings and fail to consider the long-term costs associated with those savings. China's currency policy may make that country the primary source of the U.S. current account deficit, but absent China, the U.S. would face the same structural problems with another country standing in as the target of protectionist arguments.

2 Locked Sections · 205 words remaining
Sign up to read these 2 sections

Legislative Approaches to China's Currency Policy · 90 words

"Tariffs and sanctions are the most effective policy tools"

WTO Rulings and the Limits of Diplomatic Pressure · 115 words

"WTO rulings unlikely to change Chinese behavior alone"

Conclusion

An aggressive legislative posture is only meaningful if paired with genuine political will to follow through on threatened sanctions and quotas. Without that commitment, trade rhetoric becomes empty — and China, as a rational economic actor, will have little reason to alter a currency policy that continues to serve its national interests.

You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Yuan Revaluation Current Account Deficit Consumer Debt Trade Tariffs WTO Rulings Emerging Economies Currency Policy Import Prices Protectionism Anti-Dumping
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). China's Currency Policy and the U.S. Trade Deficit. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/china-currency-policy-us-trade-deficit-29385

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.