This paper examines Claude Perrault's theory of architecture and its foundational role in modern architectural thought. Drawing on the work of scholars including Wolfgang Herrmann and Alberto Perez-Gomez, the paper explores how Perrault's theoretical framework emerged from seventeenth-century French architectural culture, particularly in relation to the east façade of the Louvre Colonnade. It analyzes Perrault's controversial distinction between "positive beauty" and "arbitrary beauty," his grid-based approach to measuring and averaging the classical orders, and his challenge to the Vitruvian legacy. The paper argues that Perrault's contributions were not simply the imposition of a new theory, but rather a systematic analysis of architecture's existing discordancies.
The concept of architectural theory has been in existence for many decades. It takes the whole point of architecture as a matter of understanding the field's application, belonging both to practice and to knowledge. As stated by Onefrei (p. 12), architectural theory can be defined as the act of conceiving, discussing, and writing about architecture. Theory attempts to offer more detail on why certain structures look unique and why architects choose to give a particular building a specific design. It also provides reasons for the shift from old to modern architectural design, accounting for the expectations and attitudes of architects that have led to changes in thinking across particular periods — and to the kinds of transformations previously experienced in the architectural field.
According to Herrmann (2008), the theory of architecture is meant to identify problems that arise when architecture does not represent its environment properly. It also examines the causes of such problems and, more frequently, provides solutions to them. The theory of architecture examines the success and durability of various works and the way a specific structure represents a particular institution. The analysis of the success or failure of a single building, or the work of a small group of architects in the task of architectural representation, is called architectural criticism. Theory applies the same kind of critical thinking at the global level, examining the whole of architectural production. It looks at the stylistic choices currently available to architects and asks whether they are capable of adequately representing the contemporary environment. This is theory's critical role.
This paper discusses the theories of Claude Perrault and why they support ideas that marked the origins of modern reflection on architectural theory. It also presents fundamental evidence for why Perrault's theories were considered highly controversial in their time.
As stated by Herrmann (2008), Claude Perrault's theory engages with a theoretical debate centered primarily on architecture in seventeenth-century France. As noted in the book published by Laugier, Herrmann observed that Perrault's theory addresses the role of the architectural theoretician, focusing mainly on the function of theory in the development of architectural production (Herrmann, p. 2). The work and activities of Perrault were unified by a common thread, though one concealed even from Perrault himself: obedience to the policies and rules of the court. Whether as a writer, translator, architect, or academician, Claude Perrault felt deeply the critical role awaiting him as a civil servant. He took orders from his superiors — the King and Colbert — and carried out duties that had direct repercussions for the establishment of royal architectural policy, known as the general plan to ensure the supremacy of the French monarchy.
A number of analyses of Perrault recognize an affinity between his theory of architecture and the designs realized in the Louvre Colonnade, examining the modernity that characterizes both. As clearly stated by Alberto Perez-Gomez, the foundation of Perrault's theory originated from the east façade of the Louvre, which appears invented in the most radically modern and original sense, providing the principal foundation on which an understanding of architecture could be constructed. The phrase "radically modern" extends so as to legitimate an account that was detected in Perrault. According to Perrault's theory, there is refutable evidence indicating that this incursion resulted in a kind of unique transgression from which architecture has had to redeem itself ever since.
It remains a fact that the Louvre Colonnade stood ahead of Perrault's theory of architecture — appearing much earlier, almost several decades prior — and reappears several times throughout Perrault's writings. The theory of Perrault is built around the theory of the Louvre, which is precisely why it is not easy to separate Perrault from the Louvre. Antoine Picon has also highlighted that Perrault had a profound interest in architecture and became curious in the manner of a classical savant. This curiosity led him to develop an interest in attempting to ground the art of building in a rigorous discipline — one in which creative tasks occur as the precise expression of a theoretical position.
Perrault's engagement with the Louvre was therefore not merely practical but deeply theoretical. The façade served as both a testing ground and a symbol for his broader claims about the nature of architectural beauty and the legitimacy of rule-governed design. His involvement in the Louvre project gave material weight to what might otherwise have remained purely speculative arguments about proportion, authority, and the classical orders.
"New models of authorship in French Baroque architecture"
"Controversial claims about positive and arbitrary beauty"
"Grid system averaging the classical architectural orders"
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.