This paper examines the significance of coffee as a global commodity within the broader context of economic globalization. Drawing on Benjamin Barber's "Jihad vs. McWorld" framework, the paper traces coffee's historical importance from early European coffehouses through its rise as a critical export for developing nations in South America, Central America, and Africa. It analyzes how major producers such as Brazil, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Indonesia became economically dependent on coffee exports, and how fluctuations in global coffee prices triggered widespread social hardship, including increased poverty and reduced access to education. The paper concludes that the coffee crisis illustrates the vulnerabilities inherent in a globalized, commodity-driven economy.
Globalization has produced some of the most interesting transformations in the world economy over time. In the 16th and 17th centuries, trade in Indian spices and exotic condiments was considered one of the most important aspects of international commerce, and conquest wars were fought for control of the regions that produced them. In today's world, the market has become more specialized in terms of the commodities it sustains. In this sense, coffee has become a true commodity in the context of the globalized world.
The issue of globalization is by no means a new subject for the study of international relations and international trade. It can be argued that even the ancient Romans and Greeks practiced a form of global trade, however constrained by the boundaries of their empires. Especially after the end of the Cold War, however, globalization became a defining phenomenon of everyday life. Evidence of globalized economic relations appears in all areas of life, from cable television that broadcasts live from every corner of the world, to bananas from Ecuador or Chile sold in every supermarket in the United States or Europe. It is important to note, however, that the world is not reducible to mere economic exchanges; political life has often been considered equally global in character. Yet the forces that bring together economic entities may be the same ones tearing apart political and cultural ones.
Indeed, the world we live in is marked by a global perspective. Benjamin Barber, writing in 1992, described the tension between "Jihad" and "McWorld" as representative elements of culture and economy respectively. He noted that "these two tendencies are sometimes visible in the same countries at the same instant: thus Yugoslavia, clamoring just recently to join the New Europe, is exploding into fragments; India is trying to live up to its reputation as the world's largest integral democracy while powerful new fundamentalist parties like the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, along with nationalist assassins, are imperiling its hard-won unity. States are breaking up or joining up: the Soviet Union has disappeared almost overnight, its parts forming new unions with one another or with like-minded nationalities in neighboring states" (Barber, 1992). It can therefore be concluded that economic globalization — which can be measured in part through the impact of commodities — does not necessarily benefit all aspects of a state. It may improve the economy while simultaneously exerting a negative influence on the cultural and social dimensions of society.
Coffee is one of the most important commodities in the world, particularly for large coffee-producing nations. It has been a well-known trade good since the time of the Venetians and was a fashionable drink across the European continent. As one historical account notes, "in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, coffee was by far the most popular of the three 'temperance beverages' in England (the other two being tea and chocolate). Some 2,000 coffeehouses, it is estimated, existed in London alone in the late seventeenth century" (Good, n.d.). The influence of coffee was therefore significant well before the twentieth century. Even so, the general consensus is that, unlike other commodities such as gold or oil, coffee has not been a clear-cut cause for waging wars (Good, n.d.).
Countries in South America became some of the most important coffee producers, as the climate suited the plant and the labor conditions were appropriate for this type of plantation agriculture. Nations such as Brazil, Colombia, and various African states became major coffee exporters. According to the International Coffee Organization, "in 1905 Colombia exported five hundred thousand bags of coffee; by 1915 exports had doubled. While Brazil desperately tried to control its overproduction, Colombian coffee became increasingly popular with American and European consumers. In 1914 Brazil supplied three-quarters of U.S. imports with 5.6 million bags, but by 1919 that figure had fallen to 4.3 million, while Colombia's share had risen from 687,000 to 915,000 bags. During the same period Central American exports to the U.S. had risen from 302,000 to 1.2 million bags" (ICO, n.d.).
The coffee trade also became critically important for African countries, particularly after the decolonization process ended and states such as Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi gained their independence. According to the ICO, "coffee is crucial to the economies and politics of many developing countries; for many of the world's Least Developed Countries, exports of coffee account for more than 50 percent of their foreign exchange earnings. Coffee is a traded commodity on major futures and commodity exchanges, most importantly in London and New York" (ICO, n.d.).
"Developing nations' reliance on coffee export revenue"
"Poverty and hardship from falling coffee prices"
The coffee crisis is not a new phenomenon; there have been comparable crises in other commodity markets, such as oil. However, this phenomenon is a clear characteristic of the globalized world, which recognizes no frontiers, tariffs, or state controls. It can therefore be concluded that Barber's 1992 essay foresaw the future accurately in describing the struggle between Jihad — representing cultural identity — and McWorld, a metaphor for the interdependent world we inhabit today. The story of coffee illustrates precisely this tension: a globally traded commodity that simultaneously drives economic development and generates profound social vulnerability for the millions who depend on it.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.