Colonial America: Identity, Nationalism, and Community

Introduction: Colonial History and American Identity

The history of the United States can be considered the result of hundreds of years of struggles and hardships that have left their mark on the culture and traditions of the American people. Given their long experience with democracy, it is difficult to identify the precise factors and elements that contributed to the establishment of American society at the forefront of the democratic world. However, it is fair to say that it is precisely this tradition that has demonstrated the viability of democracy to the wider world. Even so, the American people faced great struggles in finding their path and best social composition in order to survive the challenges of history and the changes of time.

In this sense, there are several questions whose answers may, to the extent that history can be properly understood, shed light on one of the most important eras in the history of the United States: the colonial period and its aftermath. Regardless of the perspective from which such a theme is addressed, it is clear that the colonial period and the events it triggered shaped the nature of American society as it exists today.

Nationalism in Colonial America: Hindrances and Catalysts

The issue of nationalism is, even in modern times, an aspect that is very difficult to define. During the early beginnings of the American colonies, however, there was a particular sense of national identity taking shape, despite the divergent views of the population and its political representatives. On the one hand, there were the supporters of the British Crown — representatives of a powerful empire, but also of a system that would not allow the full development of the colonies without significant restraints (Jenkins, 1997). The presence of British rule in the American colonies was therefore one of the main elements that led to a clear manifestation of nationalist sentiment.

On the other hand, the Republicans were the opposing force to the Loyalists, the supporters of the British Crown. They rejected the pressures imposed by the Empire across all dimensions of life. More precisely, dress codes, behaviors, acceptable topics of discussion, and even meals were expected to conform to British standards. However, an emerging class that desired the freedom to form its own opinions and choose its own political leaders began to rebel against these traditions of British oversight.

It is rather difficult to pinpoint precisely what elements defined nationalism in America, but an important factor that strengthened the idea of being an American — rather than a British subject — was the rejection of the Crown's authority. Moreover, even in an emerging democracy such as colonial America was in the early eighteenth century, a political attitude could have been the result of rejecting something rather than necessarily choosing something better.

Beyond the ethical issues through which the emerging American people discovered a sense of nationalism, there were also significant economic factors. These included the increased pressures imposed by the British Crown, particularly during and after the wars waged against the French and the Indians. After Britain won those conflicts, the Crown determined that a greater economic effort was needed to recapture lost wealth and offset the costs of the war. The British justified these measures by arguing that the wars had been fought to protect the colonies. The result, however, was additional taxes and increased economic pressure on the export of goods.

Another major issue that triggered nationalist sentiment was the lack of proper political representation. The imposition of additional taxes implied, in the view of American representatives, a corresponding increase in the representation of American colonies in the British Parliament — something the Crown refused to grant.

American nationalism became visible at the moment when prominent voices began to echo widespread discontent. Particularly after the Stamp Act and the Tea Act, more and more people grew dissatisfied with the way the British Crown treated the colonies and with the degree to which trade had become controlled by the Empire. In effect, these grievances culminated in the American Revolution, which represented the beginning of an independence movement.

Irreconcilable Differences: American Colonists and the British Crown

The American colonies and Britain ultimately came to have irreconcilable differences that defined their relationship. There were economic, moral, and political divergences that weighed most heavily in the eventual split between the American colonies and the British Empire.

The economic differences were rooted in the increased taxes imposed on the colonial population following the wars fought with American assistance. The Stamp Act, the Tea Act, and similar measures raised the financial burden on the American population considerably. Furthermore, the British established a particular system through which tax collection became more systematic and effective.

From a moral standpoint, following the French and Indian Wars, the British held different views about the proper attitude and obligations of the colonies. More precisely, the British considered the American colonies to be somewhat responsible and morally indebted for the effort the Empire had made to defend them (Jenkins, 1997).

The political dimension was most sharply reflected in the denial of meaningful representation to the American colonies in the British Parliament. There were even those who, if not openly supportive of change, at least acknowledged the situation and suggested a reformed but still imperial system.

From certain perspectives, these differences were not entirely irreconcilable. The Loyalists, for example, supported the maintenance of British influence despite disagreements over taxation, believing that an improved arrangement within the Empire remained possible. They considered the issue of taxation without representation to be not a fundamental injustice but rather a structural problem within the Empire — one that could be resolved through "a restructured Empire, which guaranteed to the American colonies control over internal taxation and local matters, with Parliament keeping its sovereign power to legislate in imperial issues" (Dore, 2008). Nevertheless, on these matters the differences were in practice very sharp, and the Loyalists were ultimately reluctant to adopt a definitive stance, partly out of fear of British repercussions.

Bibliography

Bell, N. S. Pathways of the Puritans. Old America Company. Framingham, 1930.

Dore, Gilbert. Why the Loyalists Lost. Archiving Early America. 2008.

Elson, Henry William. History of the United States of America. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1904.

Jenkins, P. A History of the United States. New York: Palgrave, 1997.

Sperry, Willard L., and Ralph Lazzaro. Religion in America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1946.