Communicative Approach to Acts 20:35 in Biblical Context
This paper applies the Communicative Approach to Acts 20:35 — Paul's reminder to the Ephesian Elders that "it is more blessed to give than to receive" — arguing that the verse can only be fully understood within its larger literary and theological context. Drawing on Jeannine Brown's framework of Scripture as communicative act, the paper situates the verse within the whole of the Acts of the Apostles, examines the background and objectives of St. Luke as author, and explores the verse's connection to Christian charity and the missionary spirit. It also evaluates weaknesses of decontextualized reading, illustrated by Liberation Theology's selective use of Scripture, before concluding that Acts 20:35 points primarily to spiritual selflessness rather than material redistribution.
- Introduction: Scripture as Communicative Act: Introduces the Communicative Approach and target verse
- Background: The Acts of the Apostles and St. Luke: Context, themes, and authorship of Acts
- The Strength of the Communicative Approach: Contextual analysis and Scripture's primacy over theory
- Luke's Objective and Authorial Context: Luke's biography, background, and authorial purpose
- Understanding Christ and the Christian Mission in Acts 20:35: Christ's humanity and charity as missionary example
- Weaknesses: Decontextualized Reading and Liberation Theology: Liberation Theology as failure of contextual reading
- Conclusion: Why Acts 20:35: Spiritual selflessness as the verse's core meaning
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It consistently returns to a single verse, using it as an anchor while demonstrating how the Communicative Approach opens outward to the whole book and broader theological tradition.
- It balances strengths and weaknesses of the interpretive approach, giving the argument intellectual honesty by engaging Liberation Theology as a counterexample of decontextualized reading.
- The authorial background section on St. Luke is unusually detailed and well-integrated, showing how knowing the author enriches interpretation — a technique central to the Communicative Approach.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates contextual exegesis — the practice of reading a verse within its literary, historical, and theological surroundings before drawing interpretive conclusions. Rather than treating Acts 20:35 as a standalone aphorism, the author situates it within the narrative arc of Acts, the character of Luke, and the overarching theme of Christian charity, illustrating how meaning expands when context is restored.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing the Communicative Approach and identifying the target verse. It then provides background on Acts and St. Luke before articulating the method's strengths through Kaiser and other scholars. A detailed section on Luke's biography and objectives follows, after which the paper applies the approach to Christology and Christian mission. A dedicated weaknesses section critiques Liberation Theology as a case study in ignoring whole-book context. The conclusion synthesizes the spiritual reading of the verse, affirming charity as the interpretive key.
Introduction: Scripture as Communicative Act
As Jeannine Brown (2007) notes, it was Zwingli who advocated pulling verses from the Bible and doing "with them as we will" (p. 213). However, removing Scripture from its context shows little "respect for the text as communicative act" (Brown, 2007, p. 213). According to the Communicative Approach, Scripture should be accessed on its own terms and within its own literary context. In other words, Scriptural verses are part of a larger, often narrative, whole.
This is certainly the case with Acts 20:35, in which Paul tells the Ephesian Elders, "I have shown you in every way, by laboring like this, that you must support the weak. And remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He said, 'It is more blessed to give than to receive'" (Acts 20:35). The maxim that it is better to give than to receive has often been quoted out of its Scriptural context. By restoring it to the narrative account provided in Acts and analyzing it by way of the Communicative Approach, a much fuller understanding of the verse can be obtained. This paper will analyze Acts 20:35 according to the Communicative Approach and discuss it in terms of its strengths and weaknesses.
Background: The Acts of the Apostles and St. Luke
The Acts of the Apostles, traditionally believed to have been penned by St. Luke around 63 AD, is written in the narrative genre. It relates the events that occurred from the time of Jesus' last instructions to the Apostles before His Ascension into Heaven, then follows the missions of Sts. Peter and Paul and the founding and spreading of the Church. One of the key themes of Acts is the emphasis placed upon delivering the Gospel to the Gentiles — a major factor in the spread of Christianity. Another key theme is the persecution of the early Church from its very inception. The major characters are Peter and Paul. Key events of the book include miracles worked by Peter, the arrests of Peter and John, the martyrdom of St. Stephen, Saul's persecution of the Christians, Saul's conversion and baptism, Paul's missions and trials, his arrests, journeys, and escapes — and more.
St. Luke was a Gentile by birth and by profession a doctor. According to tradition, he was also an artist and is still revered by many today as a patron of both doctors and artists. An early companion of St. Paul, Luke can be said to have been influenced by the Apostle. Indeed, Luke's writings are filled with a similar zealousness found in Paul's letters. What makes Acts unique among the other Gospel narratives is that it emphasizes the nature of the work of the disciples following the Resurrection and Ascension of Christ. The Acts of the Apostles is an account of the life of the early Church from the time of Christ's Ascension into Heaven up to St. Paul's preaching in Rome while under arrest. Written around 63 AD by St. Luke, it illustrates the fulfillment of Christ's promise to His Apostles to send the Holy Ghost to strengthen, sanctify, guide, and help establish His Church. For this reason, Acts has even been called "The Gospel of the Holy Ghost." Thus, the development of the early Church and the actions of the Apostles count as the two major themes of this book.
The book is dedicated to Theophilus in its introduction, but the major themes reveal that it is meant to be more than its dedication implies: it may be viewed as a historical supplement to the Gospels and Epistles, and thus meant for the Church as a whole. With this in mind, it is much easier to understand what Jeannine Brown means when she says, "I hope it is becoming clear that we ought to read books of the Bible as wholes, since that is how their authors would have intended that they be read" (p. 214). Indeed, Acts 20:35 can be illuminated more fully if it is analyzed within the context of Acts as a whole. And when Acts as a whole is viewed as a kind of historical supplement emphasizing the gifts of the Holy Ghost, Acts 20:35 becomes particularly interesting: it connects to the missionary spirit of the Church and the promise of God to be with His Church always. The laborer is connected to the missionary, and giving is connected to the gifts of the Holy Ghost.
The Strength of the Communicative Approach
Walter C. Kaiser states that "a good criterion for assessing the validity as well as the value that a theory may have for exegesis is to ask this question: Could the interpretation of a particular passage be supported even if we did not have the theory?" (Kaiser, 1994, p. 127). The question is indicative of the value of the text itself when compared to the theory meant to support it. The text, in other words, is more important than the theory, which is merely implemented to help strengthen one's understanding of the text. It is not meant to replace the text or provide inference; it is simply used to help provide a framework, or to help draw out the context of the work itself. As Kaiser notes, "it is the text that must be ultimately determinative" (p. 127).
Therefore, a proper understanding of Scripture may help establish a proper understanding of Acts 20:35. The strength of the Communicative Approach is that it allows for a contextual analysis. The proper context in which Acts 20:35 may be situated is that of the whole of Scripture — for as John MacArthur (2009) observes, the will of God is found in Scripture (p. 62). To elaborate on this point, one may say explicitly that it is in the Bible that one can find out what it means to be a Christian. It is, after all, from Scripture that we learn the various sayings of Jesus, after whom Christians model themselves. And it is Jesus who tells his followers to know and do the will of God: "Seek first the kingdom of God" is Christ's command for all who want to know what to do in this life. Paul elaborates on Christ's message in Acts 20:35 when he observes that it is better to give than to receive — and good to support the weak. What he implies is that laboring in the vineyard of Christ is a better life than one lived simply for one's own sake. Essentially, he who gives to God gives to all — or, he who gives to all gives to God.
Likewise, Leon Morris (1988) asserts that "Luke sees [His] divine purpose as intimately bound up with the love and the mercy of God" (p. 16). Such a theme, discernible in Acts and in Acts 20:35 especially, would obviously have been appealing to Luke the physician. The symmetry of ideas would have appealed to Luke the artist and painter. The excellent philosophy would have appealed to Luke the Greek. And the beauty, nobility, and kinship expressed in the Gospel would, of course, have appealed to Luke the Gentile.
Conclusion: Why Acts 20:35
The beauty of choosing a verse like Acts 20:35 and analyzing it from a Communicative Approach is that it allows one to open up the whole of the book and discern an even greater message than a mere verse might be able to convey. As Ronald Allen (1984) states, "Strictly speaking, many of the exegetical disciplines are descriptive and not theological" (p. 3). The Communicative Approach, however, allows one to place Acts 20:35 squarely in the spiritual realm where it belongs, with Christ and His sacrifice on the cross as its foundation.
By remembering the person of Luke, his own background and his own preoccupations, one also maintains a better sense of the direction of the work as a whole. By seeing how Acts emphasizes the role of the Holy Ghost in the lives of the missionaries and in their examples to the early Christians, one can avoid slipping into materialistic interpretations of Scripture. As Paul implies in Acts 20:35, it is better to give than to receive — but when one contemplates the context of the passage, he sees that Paul means this primarily on a spiritual level first, and that once one has given himself to God, he is free to give himself to others — not for their own sake but for the greater glory of God.
In conclusion, Acts 20:35 serves as a reminder of the importance of selflessness — not of assuaging poverty — but of denying one's own will and subjecting it to the higher will, which is God's. And God's will, as the whole of Scripture attests, is charity. Charity is the highest law, and Acts 20:35 illustrates this principle by showing Paul as one who has taken it to heart.
References
Allen, R. (1984). Contemporary Biblical Interpretation for Preaching. MI: Judson Press.
Barla, J. B. (1999). Christian Theological Understanding of Other Religions. Rome: Editrice Pontificia Universita Gregoriana.
Benedict XVI. (2009). Caritas in Veritate. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
Brown, J. (2007). Scripture as Communication: Introducing Biblical Hermeneutics. MI: Baker Academic.
Hellwig, M. (2002). Understanding Catholicism. NJ: Paulist Press.
Kaiser, W. C. (1994). An Introduction to Biblical Hermeneutics. MI: Zondervan.
Knight, K. (2011). Gospel of Saint Luke. New Advent. Retrieved from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09420a.htm
MacArthur, J. (2009). How to Study the Bible. Chicago: Moody Publishers.
Morris, L. (1988). Luke: An Introduction and Commentary. Leicester, UK: Inter-Varsity Press.
Saint Luke. (2008). Catholic Online. Retrieved from http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=76
Sanders, J. A. (1969). Dissenting deities and Philippians 2:1–11. Journal of Biblical Literature, 88(3), pp. 279–290.
Sigmund, P. E. (1990). Liberation Theology at the Crossroads: Democracy or Revolution? UK: Oxford University Press.
Woods, T. E. (2008). How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.