This case study examines a patient diagnosed with contact dermatitis due to metal exposure who presents concerns about a possible link between their eczema and rhinitis. The paper reviews the mechanisms underlying irritant and allergic contact dermatitis, including the roles of Toll-like receptors, danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and Th1/Th2 immune responses. It also explores the atopic march — the progression from childhood atopic dermatitis through food allergies, asthma, and ultimately rhinitis — and evaluates whether the patient's metal-induced dermatitis and allergic rhinitis share a common immunological basis.
Contact dermatitis on the hands can be caused by a number of distinct mechanisms (Usatine & Riojas, 2010). The type most amenable to treatment is dermatitis caused by environmental irritants. Other possible causes include allergic and atopic dermatitis, each arising from different mechanisms. The patient under consideration here has been diagnosed with contact dermatitis due to metal exposure and is concerned about a possible link between the eczema and rhinitis. This report examines the pathophysiology of contact dermatitis and whether there could be any relationship between the patient's dermatitis and rhinitis.
Irritant contact dermatitis is caused by exposing the skin to harmful substances (Usatine & Riojas, 2010). A wound or injury can compromise the skin's ability to maintain an effective barrier against noxious substances, resulting in skin trauma. A single or chronic exposure can lead to local inflammation of the skin and produce a characteristic pattern of thick, scaly lesions on the hands (Alavi, Skotnicki, Sussman, & Sibbald, 2012). Treatment and management is fairly straightforward and involves cleansing the skin, bandaging any wounds or injuries, and preventing future exposures either by avoiding the substance or using personal protective gear. Irritant contact dermatitis can lead to the development of allergic contact dermatitis.
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) results when the immune system has inappropriately reacted to an otherwise benign substance as if it were a harmful agent (Usatine & Riojas, 2010). One of the most important functions of the skin is to distinguish between useful or commensal microbes and those that could potentially cause harm (McFadden, Puangpet, Basketter, Dearman, & Kimber, 2013). The skin would not be able to perform this barrier function without the immune system, which has evolved an elaborate method for distinguishing between beneficial and harmful microbes and reacting appropriately. The immune system also plays a critical role in wound repair, including the growth of new tissue. This system has gone astray when ACD develops.
Some of the most common allergens that cause contact dermatitis are poison ivy and nickel (Usatine & Riojas, 2010). Statistically, the patient who is the subject of this case study would most likely have ACD to nickel, although other metals have been known to cause ACD. A recent meta-analysis of skin patch tests revealed the most common allergen identified was nickel (14.7%), followed by thimerosal (5.0%), cobalt (4.8%), and fragrance (3.4%). However, in most people these substances do not elicit an immune reaction, which raises the question of why ACD occurs.
There are two mechanisms believed to lead to the development of ACD: immune activation during wound repair and/or a non-commensal microbe infection (McFadden, Puangpet, Basketter, Dearman, & Kimber, 2013). Regardless of how the metal came into contact with the patient's immune system, the sensitization results in the metal being "seen" as dangerous. Immune tolerance to the metal is therefore lost, theoretically through a process of covalent binding to skin proteins; however, exposure to the metal alone is usually insufficient to trigger an immune response. What is needed is a "danger" or "pathogen" signal being presented to the immune system at the same time it is exposed to the metal.
The danger signal consists of extracellular matrix proteins released when skin trauma occurs (McFadden, Puangpet, Basketter, Dearman, & Kimber, 2013). These proteins are called danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and include fibronectin, hyaluronan, cathelicidin, and heparin sulfate. Non-commensal microbes also produce pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), including lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid. Both DAMPs and PAMPs bind to and activate Toll-like receptors (TLRs) expressed on the surface of cells; the most relevant to ACD are believed to be TLR2 and TLR4. Although an adaptive, and thus antibody-mediated, immune response is being triggered, the most immediate response is activation of the innate immune system.
When a DAMP binds to TLRs, a proinflammatory response is triggered through production of IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, IL-23, and interferon-γ (McFadden, Puangpet, Basketter, Dearman, & Kimber, 2013). This is a prototypical T-helper-1 (Th1) immune response designed to clear intracellular pathogens (Spergel, 2010). The Th1 cells involved in the immune response begin to produce large amounts of DAMP proteins, thereby generating a positive feedback loop. If the patient is suffering from atopy, however, the severity of the ACD could be reduced and/or the immune response could eventually convert to a Th2, IgE-mediated immune response. A similar series of events can be triggered when an otherwise non-allergenic metal is introduced together with PAMPs.
"Atopic march linking dermatitis to rhinitis"
"Immune mechanisms connecting patient's dermatitis and rhinitis"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.