This paper examines the foundational components of contract law, focusing on what makes a contract valid and enforceable. It identifies the six essential elements of any contract — offer, acceptance, objective, mutuality of obligation, consideration, and competency — and explains how each contributes to a binding agreement. The paper then surveys the principal legal defenses that can render a contract void or unenforceable, including incapacity, mistake, duress, undue influence, unconscionability, and misrepresentation or fraud. Finally, it outlines the circumstances under which a contract may be legally dissolved without court involvement and emphasizes the importance of specificity in drafting enforceable agreements.
The paper demonstrates effective use of direct quotation from legal authorities (Trietel, USLegal) to anchor definitions of technical concepts. By quoting precise legal language rather than paraphrasing, the writer preserves the exactness required in legal discourse while attributing claims appropriately — a critical skill in law-related academic writing.
The paper opens with a brief orienting introduction, then devotes its core sections to the six formation elements, followed by a systematic survey of defenses. A shorter section covers non-judicial methods of dissolution, and the paper closes with a practical note on drafting precision. Each section builds on the previous one, making the argument cumulative rather than episodic. The reference list follows APA format.
Several elements determine the enforceability and validity of a contract. Similarly, several elements can cancel an agreement between two or more parties and/or void a contract entirely. To determine what makes a contract enforceable — and how to legally exit one — it is important to understand the fundamental components that make up a legally binding contract.
Regardless of the type of contract, all contracts are composed of six different legal elements: offer, acceptance, objective, mutuality of obligation, consideration, and the requirement that all parties entering into the contract are competent (Cross, 2007). When dealing with contracts, the offer can be defined as "an expression of willingness to contract on certain terms, made with the intention that [the contract] shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed" (Trietel, 2007). Acceptance of a contract requires that all parties agree on identical terms; however, rejection of any or all parts of a contract allows for a counter-offer to be made. The terms defined in both the offer and the acceptance are restricted to the parties that entered into the original contract and are not transferable.
The objective of a contract must be determined for legal reasons. A contract that contains any illegal terms or conditions cannot be enforced by law. The mutuality of agreement between contractual parties is the determination that the parties are in "mutual agreement" and that they are willing to "assent to the expression of their argument" (Legal Elements of a Contract, n.d.). Consideration determines and establishes the terms and agreements being made between contractual parties. Moreover, in order to ensure the validity of a contract, the parties entering into it must be of sound mind and judgment; incompetency can be used as a legal defense against enforcement (Legal Elements of a Contract, n.d.).
Defenses to a contract — that is, ways a contract can be legally voided — include incapacity, mistake, duress, undue influence, unconscionability, and misrepresentation or fraud. If a person enters into a contract while ill, intoxicated, or mentally unstable, the contract can be found unenforceable if it can be proven that the parties were not of sound mind or judgment at the time of signing. If mistakes are found within a contract, the contract may also be considered unenforceable; however, if any of the parties knowingly enter into a contract containing mistakes, then "knowledge of the mistake will be imputed to each party" (Breach of Contract: Defenses, 2010).
If a party was coerced or pressured into entering a contract, duress can be claimed. Duress includes extortion, physical violence, threats, and/or a show of force. Undue influence occurs when "one party exercises such control over a second party as to overcome the independent judgment and free will of the second party" (Breach of Contract: Defenses, 2010). Unconscionability arises when contractual terms and conditions are deemed a violation of public policy and are considered to "offend the court's sense of fairness" (Breach of Contract: Defenses, 2010). Fraud and/or misrepresentation take place when one party intentionally seeks to deceive the other; fraud requires willful misrepresentation or the concealment of material facts (Breach of Contract: Defenses, 2010).
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.