This paper offers a comparative analysis of the cultural diplomacy programs of two major global powers: the United States and China. It examines how each nation deploys soft power tools—including the Fulbright Program, Voice of America, Hollywood, Confucius Institutes, TikTok, and the Belt and Road Initiative—to advance foreign policy goals, shape national brand image, and build international relationships. The paper also explores how digital technology has transformed cultural diplomacy, and considers the risks that arise when cultural exchange becomes propaganda. Ultimately, it argues that while cultural diplomacy can serve as a bridge between nations, it is often wielded as an instrument of hegemonic competition, with significant consequences for the global order.
Cultural diplomacy programs serve as valuable tools for countries to extend their global influence, project their cultural values, and foster international relationships. This paper offers a comparative analysis of the cultural diplomacy programs of two major global powers: China and the United States. Each nation, wielding unique cultural resources and facing distinct challenges, employs cultural diplomacy in diverse ways to advance its global image and foreign policy goals. Through an exploration of the purposes, tools, operational contexts, and impacts of these programs, one can better understand how these activities advance artistic, financial, economic, and political purposes, thereby enhancing national brand image.
One can also see, however, the ways that cultural diplomacy acts as a tool of soft power in a play for dominance among hegemons. In a world where digital technology is revolutionizing communication and interaction, understanding the dynamics of cultural diplomacy becomes even more important to the study of geopolitics. Ultimately, this analysis underscores the importance of mutual respect and appreciation in cultural diplomacy, due to its potential to not only serve as an effective tool of influence but also as a bridge bringing nations and peoples closer together. It also highlights the problems that arise when this tool is used for power plays rather than for building a collaborative international environment.
Cultural diplomacy, a subset of public diplomacy, refers to the process by which a nation's culture is used as a tool to foster mutual understanding and build relationships with other countries (Mulcahy, 1999). This form of diplomacy is about showcasing a country's cultural richness and diversity to the world, which in turn can foster mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation among nations. Cultural diplomacy can take many forms, such as cultural exchanges, educational programs, art exhibitions, music and film festivals, and language learning initiatives.
For instance, the British Council, the UK's international organization for cultural relations and educational opportunities, facilitates cultural exchanges by sending British artists, musicians, and authors to other countries to participate in events and collaborate with local creatives. In return, it also invites artists and scholars from around the world to the UK for similar engagements. This two-way exchange allows people from different cultures to appreciate each other's artistic and intellectual contributions, fostering mutual respect and understanding. This type of program is common among nations that have erected a framework for international cooperation. The Abraham Accords in the Middle East are another example of how this can take place.
Soft power, a term coined by political scientist Joseph Nye, refers to a country's ability to shape the preferences of others through appeal, persuasion, and attraction rather than through coercion or force (Nisbett, 2016). It contrasts with hard power, which involves the use of military and economic means to influence the behavior or interests of other political bodies. Soft power is often associated with the attractiveness of a country's culture, political ideals, and policies.
One of the most potent examples of soft power is the global influence of American culture, largely due to the dominance of its entertainment industry. Hollywood movies, American TV shows, music, and even fast-food chains like McDonald's are enjoyed and consumed worldwide. This global reach of American culture, combined with the appeal of its democratic ideals, contributes significantly to the United States' soft power, shaping how people worldwide perceive America and often engendering a positive disposition toward the country, even in regions where political relations may be strained. Through its use of soft power, the US has maintained influence as a leading power around the world. For many decades the US stood as the leader in soft power influence—but today its position is being challenged.
China's cultural diplomacy program is a powerful manifestation of its global aspirations (Zanardi, 2016). The primary purpose of its cultural diplomacy is to foster a positive image globally, increase its soft power, and facilitate its rise as a global superpower. One significant example is the Confucius Institutes, a network of cultural and educational centers spread worldwide, which aims to promote Chinese language and culture (Zanardi, 2016). These institutes provide language courses, host cultural events, and facilitate academic exchanges.
Chinese cultural diplomacy operates within the broader context of the Chinese government's ambitious foreign policy agenda (Zanardi, 2016). With its rapid economic development, China has sought to bolster its international image and counteract negative perceptions related to its political system and human rights issues. These efforts have seen mixed results. On one hand, the Confucius Institutes have successfully promoted Chinese culture and language, enhancing China's image as a cultural powerhouse. On the other, they have faced criticism and resistance in some countries due to concerns about propaganda and academic freedom (Zanardi, 2016).
The United States, with its powerful influence on global culture, has leveraged cultural diplomacy to advance its own foreign policy goals (Mulcahy, 1999; Vogel, 1987). The Fulbright Program has been one of the most influential tools in this respect, fostering mutual understanding between the United States and other countries through academic exchanges (Vogel, 1987). Another prominent example is international broadcasting. Networks such as Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) have been pivotal in advancing American values and culture abroad, particularly during the Cold War era. Voice of America, established in 1942, broadcasts in more than 40 languages and reaches an estimated global audience of over 275 million people weekly. It spreads news, information, and cultural programming, seeking to promote a positive view of the United States and its values of freedom, democracy, and human rights (Cull, 2008). Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty was founded to spread news and information to Eastern European countries behind the Iron Curtain. Even today, RFE/RL acts as a surrogate media in 23 countries where the free press is banned by the government or not fully established. Both of these networks serve as tools of cultural diplomacy, projecting American values and ideals to a global audience. However, through these networks, the United States can also craft narratives that present its actions in a favorable light and promote a positive image of the country and its culture (Cull, 2008).
The United States also utilizes the soft power of Hollywood, its music industry, and more recently digital culture and social media platforms to project its cultural influence worldwide. Hollywood, in particular, has a profound impact on global culture. With its blockbuster movies and popular TV series, it reaches audiences worldwide, showcasing American stories, values, and perspectives. American artists and celebrities share not only their music but also aspects of American culture and values, further enhancing the United States' soft power in parts of the world where native cultural ideals might differ significantly (Zamorano, 2016).
More recently, the rise of digital culture and social media platforms has added a new dimension to the United States' cultural diplomacy. American tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Twitter have redefined how people around the world communicate, share ideas, and access information. These platforms also allow for the rapid and broad dissemination of American cultural content, from viral YouTube videos to trending TikTok dances.
However, it is important to recognize that while these elements of American culture can be attractive and influential, they are not universally embraced. Criticisms of American foreign policy, concerns about cultural imperialism, and differing cultural values can sometimes result in resistance or backlash. Effective cultural diplomacy therefore requires not just the export of culture but also mutual exchange, respect for other cultures, and a willingness to listen and learn.
China also uses film, music, and digital technology to gain soft power. The Chinese film industry, known informally as "Chollywood," has been expanding its global reach with films that showcase Chinese history, culture, and values. Chinese pop music (C-pop) is also gaining international attention, much as K-pop has done for South Korea (Moxley, 2011). A striking example of China's use of digital technology in its cultural diplomacy is TikTok, the video-sharing app developed by the Chinese tech company ByteDance. TikTok's user-friendly interface and powerful recommendation algorithm have contributed to its global popularity, allowing users to create short videos that can be shared with a worldwide audience. This platform not only serves as a conduit for Chinese technology but also as a stage for Chinese content creators to share aspects of their culture globally.
Still, the popularity of TikTok has raised concerns in the United States and other countries. One significant concern is data privacy. As a Chinese-owned app, TikTok is subject to China's national intelligence laws, which could potentially require the company to hand over user data to the Chinese government. This has raised fears about surveillance and the misuse of personal data, leading the US to consider banning the app.
Beyond data privacy, there are broader concerns about the influence of Chinese soft power. The rise of China's influence in film, music, and digital technology can be seen as part of its broader strategy to reshape the global narrative about China and increase its soft power. This cultural influence, combined with China's economic power and increasing assertiveness in international politics, could challenge the dominance of Western—particularly American—narratives and values.
As Ang et al. (2015) argue, cultural diplomacy is about more than national interest; it is also about the negotiation of cultural differences and the fostering of accommodations. While competition and concerns are inevitable, it is important for both China and the US to engage in cultural diplomacy with mutual respect and understanding. This matters because today's world is globally integrated, and a rift between powers as large as the US and China can create significant fissures on the world stage. Such a rift already appears to be emerging over questions like Russia's war in Ukraine and China's position on Taiwan (Yeh & Chen, 2022). As Nye (2008) and Ang et al. (2015) argue, soft power is essentially about attraction and persuasion—winning hearts and minds rather than resorting to coercion or force. Cultural diplomacy can reduce tensions, prevent misunderstandings, and make conflicts less likely. However, when soft power erodes, hard power can manifest in open conflict.
Mutual understanding and respect should also facilitate cooperation on shared challenges. In today's interconnected world, problems such as climate change, global health crises, and international terrorism are global in nature and require international cooperation to address effectively. Cultural diplomacy can help build the trust and understanding necessary for such cooperation. It can also carry economic benefits, enhancing a country's reputation and attractiveness, boosting tourism, attracting foreign investment, and promoting exports (Lord & Blankenberg, 2016).
In terms of its operational context, American cultural diplomacy is managed by the U.S. Department of State and operates within the broader context of U.S. foreign policy. It is also shaped by the United States' role as a global leader in cultural fields including film, music, and digital culture (Clarke, 2016). The impact of American cultural diplomacy has been largely positive when viewed through tools like the Fulbright Program, which has been instrumental in creating a global network of scholars and professionals with a nuanced understanding of the United States and its values (Vogel, 1987).
These operations play a significant role in advancing artistic, financial, economic, and political purposes and in shaping the national brand image (Nisbett, 2016; Ang et al., 2015). They facilitate the global exchange of cultural products, contributing to a vibrant global arts scene and enhancing nations' reputations as centers of cultural production (Clarke, 2016). By positioning itself as a desirable place for study and cultural exchange, the US also attracts foreign students and tourists, boosting its economy (Wyszomirski et al., 2003). Politically, these programs serve as soft power tools, advancing foreign policy goals, improving international relations, and enhancing global influence (Cull, 2008; Nisbett, 2013).
The digital age has introduced new opportunities and challenges for cultural diplomacy. The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, accelerated the digital transformation of cultural diplomacy, with museums engaging in digital initiatives to reach global audiences (Grincheva, 2021). Both China and the United States will need to navigate this digital landscape effectively to optimize their cultural diplomacy efforts. As Grincheva (2021) notes, digital technologies offer new avenues for cultural diplomacy under pandemic conditions, allowing for innovative forms of engagement with global audiences.
For China, leveraging digital platforms could be instrumental in counteracting some of the criticism faced by its Confucius Institutes, offering more accessible and less politically sensitive avenues for cultural exchange. China's burgeoning digital culture, from TikTok to online gaming, could be harnessed to project a contemporary, dynamic image of Chinese culture globally. The United States, with its technological prowess and dominance in the digital entertainment industry, is similarly well-positioned to leverage digital platforms for cultural diplomacy.
However, the digital turn in cultural diplomacy also poses challenges. Digital divides based on access to technology and digital literacy could limit the reach and inclusivity of digital cultural diplomacy initiatives. Furthermore, growing concerns over data privacy and the securitization of digital spaces could generate resistance. To navigate these challenges, both China and the United States will need to ensure that their digital cultural diplomacy efforts are inclusive, respectful of privacy, and sensitive to local contexts. As Zamorano (2016) suggests, an overly instrumental use of culture in diplomacy can lead to backlash.
"How diplomacy shapes brand image and trade"
"BRI as China's infrastructure-based soft power"
"Media narratives, Iraq War, and propaganda risks"
Cultural diplomacy serves as a critical tool of soft power for nations, enabling them to foster mutual understanding and build relationships with other countries. This discussion examined the cultural diplomacy efforts of two major global players, the United States and China, highlighting the varying strategies and objectives of each. The United States has leveraged cultural diplomacy to advance its foreign policy goals, utilizing diverse tools such as the Fulbright Program, Hollywood, and international broadcasting networks like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. These tools have not only helped project American values and ideals globally but have also been instrumental in crafting narratives that serve American interests.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.