US–China Soft Power Competition: Hearts, Minds & Influence
This paper examines Maria Repnikova's 2022 Foreign Affairs article on the soft power rivalry between the United States and China. Drawing on Repnikova's realist theoretical framework, the paper explores how both nations deploy public diplomacy, media infiltration, cultural exchange, and economic initiatives to shape international opinion and advance foreign policy objectives. The analysis covers the key actors involved—from state institutions to individual citizens—and the global implications of this competition. The paper concludes with recommendations for strengthening communication, fostering cultural cooperation, and encouraging multilateral frameworks to manage the tensions arising from this ongoing contest for hearts and minds.
- Introduction: The Global Contest for Soft Power: Defines soft power and frames US–China rivalry
- Repnikova's Core Argument and Theoretical Framework: Realist analysis of both nations' soft power gaps
- Key Actors and Their Soft Power Strategies: State and individual actors wielding global influence
- Global Implications and Recommendations: Policy steps for cooperation and cultural exchange
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its analysis in a specific, cited scholarly source (Repnikova, 2022), giving the discussion clear academic footing and a consistent reference point throughout.
- It moves logically from concept definition, to theoretical framing, to actor-level analysis, and finally to policy recommendations — demonstrating a well-organized argumentative progression.
- Concrete examples (TV Martí, the NBA controversy, China's Belt and Road Initiative, Zambia's President Lungu) effectively illustrate abstract soft power concepts at multiple levels of analysis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates multi-level analysis — examining soft power dynamics at the individual, domestic, and systemic/global levels. By explicitly disaggregating actors and their roles, the writer avoids oversimplification and shows how the same geopolitical phenomenon plays out differently depending on the scale of observation.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into four sections: (1) an introduction that defines soft power and frames the US–China rivalry; (2) a critical summary of Repnikova's argument and realist theoretical lens; (3) an actor-centered analysis covering states, individuals, and international institutions; and (4) a concluding section with forward-looking policy recommendations for individuals, states, and transnational actors.
Introduction: The Global Contest for Soft Power
The global issue raised in the article by Repnikova (2022) is how governments use soft power to control for outcomes that are favorable to their intentions. The article shows that China and the US are two of the most powerful countries in the world, and both are known to use soft power to strengthen their standing on the global stage. It defines soft power as a form of influence that seeks to win over other actors in the international system rather than compel them through hard, coercive tactics. It notes that soft power, a term coined by political scientist Joseph Nye, is "not merely complementary to hard power but indispensable to it" — and reference is made to the "disastrous US war in Iraq" to show why hard power alone is not sufficient for stable foreign policy.
The overall aim of the article is to show that all countries use soft power, and that America and China are engaged in a soft power contest to win hearts and minds — that is, to get the citizens of their respective friendly-foes to see things their way. This is evident in the fact that the US tries to spread pro-Western influence through media and films in China, and in the fact that China bans certain films carrying themes the Chinese government sees as detrimental to its own aims. It can also be seen in the way China attempts to exert influence on US sports leagues like the NBA by suppressing political commentary from owners and players that might reflect negatively on China's internal affairs.
References
Repnikova, M. (2022). The balance of soft power: The American and Chinese quests to win hearts and minds. Foreign Affairs, 101, 44.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.