This paper examines the decision-making process applied to a business scenario involving Pinnacle's CEO, Don Anglos, and his consideration of acquiring competitor Hoilman. The paper walks through the standard stages of decision-making — from problem recognition and diagnosis through alternative development and selection — identifying where the process breaks down. It critiques Anglos's directive decision-making style for relying on limited data and excluding input from management. The paper concludes with a recommendation for a more analytical approach, emphasizing the need for quantitative analysis, broader stakeholder buy-in, and a fuller diagnosis before committing to a major strategic shift.
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis — taking a standard management model (the decision-making process) and using each stage as a diagnostic lens. Rather than simply describing the framework, the writer maps it onto the case to reveal exactly where the process is incomplete, which gives the critique precision and structure.
The paper opens by introducing the decision-making framework and locating where Pinnacle's situation sits within it. It then deepens the diagnosis section, identifying causal factors the CEO has recognized and those he has overlooked. A separate section addresses the weakness in management's opposing argument. The style analysis evaluates the CEO's cognitive approach. The paper closes with a practical, nuanced recommendation that blends analytical rigor with behavioral awareness.
There are several steps in the decision-making process: recognize a problem or opportunity, diagnose, develop alternatives, select the desired alternative, implement the chosen alternative, and evaluate. Of these, Don Anglos has currently recognized the opportunity, and the company has undertaken at least part of a diagnosis. There are only two alternatives on the table right now, partly because the diagnosis has not been fully constructed. There has been no selection of an alternative, nor any of the subsequent steps.
The diagnosis should analyze the underlying causal factors of the opportunity. The opportunity is said to arise primarily because a competitor is seeking to acquire Hoilman, but there are other factors as well. Anglos recognizes that his company is in a mature industry and believes that Pinnacle needs a competitive advantage in order to have a pathway forward to growth. The slow growth at Pinnacle is therefore one of the underlying causal factors, along with rumors that Hoilman may be seeking — and finding — a suitor elsewhere.
The fact that Hoilman holds key technology under patent, which Anglos believes would provide his company with the services boost it needs to move forward, is another underlying causal factor. Together, these elements form the core of the opportunity as Anglos perceives it, even if that perception has not yet been fully validated through rigorous analysis.
You’re 31% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.