This paper examines the socioeconomic and geographic consequences of deindustrialization, focusing on the transition from industrial to service-based economies in American cities. Drawing on scholarship by Hobor, Russo and Linkon, and Bluestone, the paper explores how formerly industrialized areas have experienced urban decay, population loss, and shrinking tax bases. It distinguishes between cities that maintained relative stability and those classified as "devastated," using Detroit as a primary case study. Detroit's dependence on a single industry, dramatic population decline from 1.8 million to under 700,000, and 2013 bankruptcy filing illustrate the most severe outcomes of deindustrialization. The paper also considers global wealth redistribution and the uneven geographic nature of post-industrial economic transitions.
When an urban area undergoes deindustrialization, several significant changes occur in both its urban and social geography. In general, there is a transition from an industrial economy to a service economy, which carries substantial socioeconomic implications. While it has been argued that deindustrialization has done little to change the basic disparities between core and periphery in the global economy, this argument is not entirely accurate. Although industrialized nations have mostly been able to transition to a post-industrial economy, there has also been a transfer of wealth from those nations to newly industrialized ones. Real wages in many Western nations have stagnated, while they are increasing rapidly in much of the developing world, thereby reducing global disparities.
It should also be noted that deindustrialization and the move to a service economy have not occurred on even geographic terms. Some formerly industrialized areas have struggled considerably with this transition. Russo and Linkon (no date) note that in many former industrial areas, the service economy has been slow to grow, resulting in urban decay, a reduction of the tax base, and declining populations. The areas of the country experiencing economic and population growth have tended to be those that were less industrialized before, and they are now attracting talented people who migrate not just from around the world but from the formerly industrialized regions of the U.S. as well.
Hobor (2012) notes, however, that while some formerly industrialized cities have maintained stability through their transition to service-based economies, others have essentially become "devastated" — characterized by economic loss, population loss, and a struggle to find relevance in the post-industrial economy.
Detroit has struggled in particular, and there is little doubt that Hobor (2012) would classify it as a "devastated" city. Detroit was the largest city in the Rust Belt and the most economically important, given its critical role as the hub of the auto industry. The city has seen massive population decline — from 1.8 million to under 700,000 — leaving many areas empty and devastating the city's tax base. Detroit remains a large metropolitan area in geographic terms, as much of the population and wealth has shifted to suburban areas. The impact on the citizens of Detroit — those who remain — has been substantial. The decline of industry eliminated many jobs and accelerated population loss. The loss of both business activity and residents caused a further decline in the city's tax base, forcing cuts to public services. This essentially created a death spiral: with fewer services, there was even less incentive for residents and businesses to remain in Detroit.
"Bankruptcy, partial renewal, and structural recovery limits"
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.