Disability, Sports, and Changing the Athlete Image
This paper is written as a public memo addressing the underrepresentation and misrepresentation of disabled athletes in sports and media. It argues that people with disabilities have historically been excluded from mainstream athletic culture and that this exclusion is reinforced by limited media coverage, inadequate school policies, and cultural stereotypes. Drawing on research about Paralympic coverage and disability sport studies, the paper calls on schools, media outlets, gyms, advertisers, and individual citizens to take concrete steps toward recognizing disabled athletes with dignity and providing the financial and institutional support necessary for their full participation in sport.
- The Problem: Disabled Athletes and Mainstream Sports Culture: Historical exclusion of disabled people from sports
- Schools and Legal Obligations Under the Rehabilitation Act: Schools must include disabled students in sports
- Media Coverage and the Paralympics: Paralympics receive far less media attention
- The Value of Sport for People with Disabilities: Sport improves outlook and wellbeing for disabled people
- Institutional and Individual Responsibility: Everyone shares responsibility for change
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The memo format is well-chosen for its audience: it directly addresses the general public with a clear subject line and actionable recommendations rather than abstract theorizing.
- The paper integrates peer-reviewed research (Hardin 2003, Staurowsky 2013) to substantiate claims about media neglect and legal requirements, lending credibility to what could otherwise read as purely opinion-based advocacy.
- The argument moves logically from systemic problems (schools, media) to broader cultural attitudes, ending with an individual-level call to action that connects the reader to the argument personally.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses direct quotation paired with contextual analysis. Rather than letting quoted material stand alone, the writer surrounds each citation with setup and follow-through, explaining why the evidence matters to the broader argument about representation and respect for disabled athletes.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the cultural and institutional problem of disability exclusion in sports. It then moves through two major institutional actors — schools (with a legal grounding in Section 504) and media (with empirical data on Paralympic coverage gaps) — before addressing the positive case for disability sport participation. It closes by distributing responsibility across institutions, advertisers, gyms, and individuals, ending on a values-based reframe: athlete first, disability second.
The Problem: Disabled Athletes and Mainstream Sports Culture
Recently, there has been a great deal of concern expressed about the modern image of sports. Sports have been criticized for being insensitive to the concerns of people who do not reflect the image of the "typical" athlete, including women, gay people, and persons with disabilities. In fact, people from all of these categories can be extraordinary athletes. The media image of who and what is constructed as an athlete must begin to change, and there must be a national conversation about the possibilities open to persons who defy conventional stereotypes of what it means to be disabled.
As scholars have noted, "people with disabilities have historically been excluded in the realms of sport — where they fail to meet standards of the 'ideal sporting body' — and in advertising, where they also fail to meet an ideal-body standard" (Hardin, 2003). Challenging this exclusion requires action from schools, media organizations, advertisers, and ordinary individuals alike.
Schools and Legal Obligations Under the Rehabilitation Act
The effort to change attitudes toward disabled athletes must begin in our schools. It is required that schools "provide disabled students with access to opportunities in extracurricular activities including varsity, club, and intramural sports under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973" (Staurowsky, 2013). Schools are not permitted to exclude persons with disabilities who are capable of participating in sports, and they must also make accommodations for students who may need adapted sporting activities — for example, providing wheelchair tennis for students who use wheelchairs.
References
Hardin, M. (2003). Marketing the acceptably athletic image: Wheelchair athletes, sport-related advertising and capitalist hegemony. Disability Studies Quarterly, 23(1), 108–125. Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/403/553
Staurowsky, E. (2013). New guidance from the Office for Civil Rights regarding athletes with disabilities. College Sports Business News. Retrieved from
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.