District 9 and French New Wave Cinema: Style and Influence
This paper examines how Neill Blomkamp's 2009 film District 9 draws upon the foundational principles of French New Wave cinema, a movement originating from the critics of Cahiers du Cinéma who rejected formulaic Hollywood filmmaking. The paper identifies key New Wave characteristics—loose story plots, improvised dialogue, erratic character behavior, jump cuts, natural lighting, and location shooting—and traces each element through District 9's documentary-style narrative. It also addresses the film's social and political commentary on institutionalized racism and apartheid, and situates District 9 within the tradition of Jean-Luc Godard's Alphaville through its blending of science fiction, bureaucratic critique, and unwarranted persecution.
- Introduction to French New Wave Cinema: Origins of French New Wave and its core principles
- Loose Story Plots and Organic Narrative: How District 9 uses open, organic storytelling
- Improvised Dialogue and Character Behavior: Improvisation techniques used by Blomkamp and actors
- Documentary Style, Jump Cuts, and Location Shooting: Documentary aesthetics and New Wave visual techniques
- Social Commentary and Apartheid Allegory: Species discrimination as apartheid allegory
- District 9 as a Continuation of Alphaville: Parallels between District 9 and Godard's Alphaville
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the analysis in a clearly defined theoretical framework—French New Wave characteristics—and systematically applies each element to the film under discussion.
- Supports claims with direct quotations from filmmakers and actors, lending credibility to the argument about improvisation and documentary technique.
- Connects the contemporary film to a canonical New Wave text (Alphaville), demonstrating awareness of genre lineage rather than treating District 9 in isolation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses comparative film analysis by mapping established critical categories (auteur theory, mise-en-scène, jump cuts) onto a contemporary work. This technique—applying a historical theoretical lens to a modern text—shows how genre conventions evolve and persist, and is a foundational method in film studies essays.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief thesis establishing District 9 as a French New Wave heir, then moves through each defining New Wave element in turn, grounding each in specific scenes or production decisions from the film. The final section widens the frame by drawing a parallel to Godard's Alphaville, adding a comparative dimension before the implied conclusion. The structure follows a claim-then-evidence pattern throughout, making the argument easy to follow.
Introduction to French New Wave Cinema
French New Wave cinema was established by film critics who founded Cahiers du Cinéma and who felt that cinema had become too commercialized, formulaic, and unoriginal. This group of critics identified two major characteristics of the New Wave movement: the manner in which mise-en-scène was utilized in film, and how the auteur theory could be applied to the work of art created. The auteur theory celebrated directors who demonstrated a distinctive personal vision, including figures such as Jean Renoir, Alfred Hitchcock, and Orson Welles.
Among the major elements of French New Wave film are loose story plots, improvised dialogue, erratic character behavior, a unique use of jump cuts, and the use of natural lighting, on-location shooting, and direct sound recording. A contemporary film that incorporates these elements into its production and design is Neill Blomkamp's 2009 film District 9. The film's unique documentary style and editing allow Blomkamp to successfully incorporate these elements into the narrative while maintaining a cohesive feel.
Additionally, District 9 offers commentary on social issues of racism and social stratification. It can be argued that this commentary reflects the institutionalized discrimination and racism known as apartheid, which was rampant in South Africa from 1948 until 1994. The film is also reminiscent of Jean-Luc Godard's sci-fi/film noir work Alphaville, combining themes of unwarranted persecution and advanced technology. Like Alphaville, District 9 comments on bureaucracy and how government influences social behavior. Through its narrative style, social and political commentary, and genre, District 9 builds upon the foundations of French New Wave cinema.
Loose Story Plots and Organic Narrative
One hallmark of French New Wave cinema is the use of loose story plots, which give audience members the feeling that anything can happen in the film and allow for open endings. The development of the story and plot in District 9 is organic, allowing the audience to see how circumstances influence the protagonist Wikus van de Merwe (played by Sharlto Copley) and how those circumstances determine the way he interacts with those around him.
The origin of the aliens in the film is deliberately left unclear. They simply appeared over Johannesburg one day in 1982, with no explanation provided. This ambiguity is consistent with the New Wave tradition of resisting tidy exposition and allowing narrative gaps to generate tension and meaning.
Improvised Dialogue and Character Behavior
Improvisation of dialogue is another defining characteristic of French New Wave filmmaking, and it is central to District 9. Most, if not all, of the alien interaction and dialogue with Wikus during the eviction scene was improvised by Jason Cope or by Sharlto Copley himself. Director Neill Blomkamp described the process in an interview:
"So we would film the two of them and then we would go to a different shack. And he'd pretend to evict a new alien. Then we'd go somewhere else and somewhere else. So it was just the two of them. The conversations between those two — the actual dialogue and what actually came out of them — was totally improvised. Any details in words and the language between the two happened right there on the day of shooting. That's what makes it feel like they are really communicating… But stuff like when he walks up into the shack and says, 'this is a gang sign, we're in a gang area right here' — we would draw the sign on the wall and he would randomly say it's a gang area. And that meant that because he's walking up to a shack that has an alien in it with a whole story that we've written, with those guys distilling their fluid, I'm like, 'that's interesting — you just said that the supporting alien character is a gangster.' But if it works, we keep going." — Neill Blomkamp
Sharlto Copley confirmed this approach from the actor's perspective:
"All of my dialogue, all of my actual lines are improvised. There's a script, but Neill works within a structure. 'This is what needs to happen in the scene — go there, evict the guy, pull the guy outside, go inside and see the computers.' And then I'll work with Jason and improvise and keep throwing stuff, throwing different options." — Sharlto Copley
This improvisational method also shapes how Wikus's character behavior is expressed on screen. His actions and reactions are fundamentally reactionary rather than scripted, which is consistent with the New Wave tendency toward erratic, spontaneous character behavior. Wikus is further characterized as an indifferent bureaucrat who happens to be married to Tanya, the daughter of Piet Smith (Louis Minnaar), a director at the Multi-National United (MNU) corporation. This family connection adds a layer of institutional complicity to his character that unfolds organically through the film's improvisational style.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.