This paper examines the relationship between emotions and cognition within the field of cognitive psychology. Drawing on Zajonc's (1984) research on the primacy of affect and Harris's (1983) work on infant cognition, the paper argues that the boundary between emotional and cognitive responses is neither fixed nor clearly defined. Through concrete examples — including startle responses, food choices, and infant behavior — the paper demonstrates that emotion and cognition frequently occur in tandem, sometimes with emotion preceding cognition and sometimes the reverse. The paper concludes that neither pure emotional nor purely logical responses are fully separable in human decision-making.
Cognitive psychology is the branch of psychology predominantly concerned with mental processes. These include how people think, perceive ideas and things, remember, and learn. It is related to other disciplines such as philosophy, neuroscience, and linguistics. According to Kendra Cherry (2011), cognitive psychology concerns the acquisition, encoding, and storage of information in the human brain. What makes cognitive psychology distinctive is that, unlike behaviorism — which focuses primarily on observable behaviors — cognitive psychology goes beyond surface behavior, treating observable action as a key to understanding internal mental states, which are its primary focus.
Of central concern in cognitive psychology is the relationship between emotions and cognition, a topic that has generated considerable debate. The line between emotion and cognition appears faint and impermanent. The two often occur together, or one evokes the other, and an individual's response to a situation is typically the result of both. It is also important to recognize that there is no fixed order in which emotion and cognition must occur; the sequence varies depending on the situation or event.
Zajonc (1984) found that emotional responses to a large number of events occurred almost immediately — even before the event was processed in the cognitive part of the brain. His research demonstrated that humans can respond emotionally to stimuli so subliminal that they bypass conscious cognition entirely. When perceptual information is received, it is first evaluated as a good–bad judgment, even before cognitive processing takes place. If a stimulus is assessed as threatening or negative, a physiological arousal and avoidance response is triggered. However, this initial response can be revised once cognition engages.
A clear illustration of this is the case where a person flinches at a loud bang, then relaxes upon realizing it was not a gunshot but a tire burst. In this example, an emotional response occurred first, and cognition came in later to clarify the nature of the stimulus — subsequently changing the response as well. Although the emotional response preceded the cognitive one, the line between the two remains temporary and difficult to measure precisely in terms of the time elapsed before cognition took over.
"Cases where cognition and emotion co-occur simultaneously"
"Infant behavior as evidence of non-cognitive emotion"
It is not practical to claim that one can fully process an event and react to it, or make a decision, following emotional predisposition alone — nor can one eliminate emotions completely and rely solely on cognitive ability. Even the attempt at purely logical thinking is influenced by cultural affiliations, making some degree of emotional response inevitable in human cognition. The interplay between emotion and cognition is continuous, context-dependent, and deeply interconnected.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.