This paper examines the process hospitals and community care clinics use to select electronic medical record (EMR) vendors. It explains why a formal vendor selection process is necessary, particularly when complex technical needs or significant capital investment are involved. The paper describes the role of a steering committee composed of key stakeholders, the use of a Request for Proposal (RFP) as a standardized evaluation tool, and the components vendors must address in their submitted proposals. It also highlights the challenge of maintaining objectivity during evaluation, discussing scoring systems and anonymization techniques as methods for reducing subjectivity in final vendor decisions.
Even as the majority of healthcare providers have come to realize that the electronic medical record (EMR) represents the most advantageous method of influencing positive patient outcomes, the management structure of many hospitals and community care clinics has remained unprepared to implement these improvements on an independent basis. A number of reputable companies have emerged to assist hospitals in the transition to an EMR system — including SigmaCare, Epic Systems, and Meditech — with each firm offering its own proprietary software and processes at varying levels of cost. In order to navigate the complex array of variables and determine which EMR vendor is best suited for a healthcare center's particular circumstances, a comprehensive vendor selection process is necessary to objectively examine all relevant factors, including the vendor's history with EMR implementation, industry-wide reputation, and budgetary limitations.
The vendor selection process is typically supervised by a steering committee consisting of the hospital or healthcare provider's key stakeholders, including corporate investors, head physicians, nursing administrators, and accountants. This structure ensures that all aspects of the hospital's operations are considered and properly integrated with the EMR system to be implemented. By drawing on expertise from multiple departments, the steering committee is positioned to evaluate vendor proposals from both a clinical and an administrative perspective.
During the vendor selection process, it typically becomes apparent to hospital administrators that a simple review of one or two competing EMR vendors will not suffice. This can occur when complex business or technical needs complicate the choice of vendors, when multiple vendors offering similar software and services are being considered, or when large sums of capital are required for the investment in EMR adoption.
In such scenarios, hospital administrators often find it useful to devise a detailed Request for Proposal (RFP) — a standardized template provided to competing EMR vendors so that they may supply specifications, project schedules, and other essential parameters of their proposed solution. When an EMR vendor receives an RFP from a hospital or community care clinic, the company responds by delivering a detailed proposal containing cost breakdowns, definitions of project scope, and scheduling constraints. The submitted proposals are then reviewed by hospital management and compared against one another before a final determination is made based on each company's responses.
"Tools and techniques to reduce evaluator bias"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.