This paper examines the discipline of environmental psychology, offering a working definition of the field and situating it within its major theoretical frameworks. It begins by defining environmental psychology as the study of how humans perceive, interpret, evaluate, and respond to their physical and social surroundings. The paper then outlines three foundational world views — organismic, mechanistic, and contextual — that have shaped the discipline since the 1940s. It proceeds to compare and contrast two primary theoretical approaches: the information processing/cognitive approach, which focuses on age-related changes in knowledge and cognition, and the structural approach, which emphasizes how relationships with others define and reshape the self. The paper concludes by underscoring the practical value of environmental psychology for designing, managing, and protecting human environments.
The objective of this paper is to examine the discipline of environmental psychology, with the additional goals of defining it and comparing and contrasting some of its underlying theoretical approaches. As Woolf (2009) notes, "Developmental psychology, as a discipline, is currently undergoing a paradigmatic/world view change. Consequently, several different theoretical approaches to the study of development and the life course have been proposed and advocated." There are three major world views and several developmental issues relevant to environmental psychology, and this paper will outline each of them in turn.
To begin, it is best to define the subject matter. Environmental psychology studies the ways in which humans perceive their environment. Human beings have particular ways of interacting with their surroundings, and environmental psychology examines and draws conclusions from these interactions — including interpretation, evaluation, operation, and response to stimuli. The bulk of environmental psychology focuses on a notion of behavioral geography, which seeks to understand the processes of interpretation and evaluation. By examining these areas, environmental psychologists concentrate on describing images, milieus, and other perceived mental maps.
Consider how changes in our physical world or our immediate physical space alter our thoughts and behaviors. Because humans respond to physical stimuli, our behavior is inevitably affected by the environments we inhabit.
Several major world views have been identified as influencing this specialty. As early as 1942, three world views were recognized: the organismic, the mechanistic, and the contextual. As Koltko-Rivera (2004, p. 1) explains, "A worldview is a set of assumptions about physical and social reality that may have powerful effects on cognition and behavior. Lacking a comprehensive model or formal theory up to now, the construct has been underused."
The approach of environmental psychology has been greatly enhanced now that world views can be distinguished from schemas, a more comprehensive collated model of the world view's component dimensions has been developed, clearer integrated theories have emerged, and the overall function of world views has been outlined through their relationships to personality traits, motivation, affect, cognition, behavior, and culture. For further background on how world views intersect with psychological theory, see the American Psychological Association's discussion of worldview research.
"Comparing cognitive and structural theoretical frameworks"
"Practical value and real-world applications of the field"
The objective of this paper was to examine the discipline of environmental psychology with the added goals of defining the science and comparing and contrasting some of its underlying theoretical approaches. By situating the field within its major world views and distinguishing between the cognitive and structural theoretical frameworks, this paper has outlined the foundations of a discipline that continues to grow in relevance as humans navigate increasingly complex physical and social environments.
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.