This paper presents a detailed estate plan for Harry and Sally, addressing their primary goal of lifelong financial stability while supporting extended family. The plan analyzes a monthly income shortfall of approximately $1,000 and recommends a five-year strategy of withdrawing from traditional IRAs to fund Roth conversions, allowing Social Security benefits to grow by 8% annually until age 70. Key recommendations include documenting wills and beneficiary designations, managing tax liability through strategic withdrawal sequencing, and planning for rising healthcare costs. The analysis demonstrates how careful coordination of retirement account types, benefit timing, and expense management can sustain the couple's current lifestyle while potentially leaving a substantial estate for heirs.
From the details provided, it appears that key goals are first and foremost ensuring lifelong financial stability, followed by helping Chad and his special needs son with additional funds whenever it can be afforded. Primary concerns include unknown changes to the tax code that could be disadvantageous in the years to come and healthcare costs, which Harry is planning to cover through continuing to work part-time for the foreseeable future.
Current expenses are $6,000 per month, and with no major changes to current lifestyle and expenditures expected, these expenses are likely to remain steady for some time. Income will remain steady following Harry's imminent retirement: $12,000 per year for Sally and $18,000 per year for Harry from Social Security, as well as $32,000 per year in pension income to Harry. Harry's part-time income will be devoted entirely to healthcare costs. This yields a total annual income of $62,000, or $5,167 per month, leaving approximately $1,000 per month in income that must be made up to maintain the current lifestyle.
Beyond revenue and expenditures, other important issues need to be addressed. Ensuring that complete and effective choices are not only made but also clearly communicated is essential to ensuring the estate plan will be carried out. These recommendations begin in a non-financial area that will affect and be affected by the financial decisions made, but that are important in themselves and should be undertaken in the timeliest fashion.
First and foremost, Harry and Sally's will needs to be re-examined and likely altered to account for developments in their lives and in the lives of their families. The financial demands of Chad's special needs child—which could represent a lifelong financial drain—might alter the distribution of benefits. In addition, the couple should ensure that beneficiary documents for life insurance and other instruments necessary for transferring funds after their passing are complete and properly organized.
Copies of these documents should be kept with an attorney, possibly with a financial adviser or planner, and with the beneficiaries of the policies—most likely Chad and Erica. None of the financial recommendations that follow will directly impact the contents of these documents, though eventual disbursements will certainly be affected. Consequently, finalizing these documents immediately is possible even while other changes are made to financial accounts and paperwork. This step establishes a clear foundation for the remainder of the plan.
Achieving financial longevity is the key goal of the plan. The bulk of the recommendations that follow concern maximizing the long-term potential of the savings and revenue streams identified. First, it should be noted that all withdrawals from the traditional IRAs, which represent the bulk of the couple's retirement savings, will be taxed at a rate that could very well change in the coming years. However, these withdrawals are not counted as income, meaning they can be contributed to the couple's Roth IRA.
Withdrawals from Roth IRAs are not taxed, meaning the money can grow in these accounts without any additional taxes, including capital gains taxes. Given the uncertain tax environment over the next decade and beyond, it might be wise to reduce the couple's traditional IRAs for use as income and to make contributions to their Roth IRAs, which can then be utilized along with smaller traditional IRA withdrawals in later years. Up to $6,000 a year can be contributed to each Roth IRA per year, and there is no limit on what can be withdrawn from traditional IRAs at this point, though these withdrawals will be taxed.
Any additional funds that the couple wish to use to help Chad with his special needs child should also come from traditional IRA withdrawals as a starting point. Harry's SEP IRA can essentially be treated as another traditional IRA for all of the recommendations regarding spending and taxation.
Using traditional IRAs as income for the next five years will not only likely lead to long-term tax advantages and hedge bets regarding future taxation but will also allow the couple to postpone collecting their Social Security benefits and thus increase the amount of these benefits by eight percent per year over the next five years. This means that the couple can collect $42,000 a year starting when both Harry and Sally are 70, rather than the $30,000 they could be collecting annually now, when they are 65.
Though this represents a loss of $150,000 over the five years Social Security benefits are not taken, this loss will be paid for in just 12.5 years by the increased amount of the benefits. That is, it will take 12.5 years for the additional $12,000 per year to equal $150,000. In addition, there is a tax benefit in waiting to collect Social Security benefits until no additional income is coming in. Harry plans to continue working part-time for the foreseeable future, and this could lead to taxation of the Social Security benefits.
When Social Security benefits are the only source of income, they are very rarely taxed. However, even with the healthcare expenses Harry plans to commit his salary toward, this income could push the combined total of his salary and Social Security benefits into a taxable realm, resulting in what essentially amounts to a tax penalty. The couple would then lose any income tax advantage rather than leaving themselves likely without any income tax liability. There will still be capital gains taxes on anything the couple earns from their retail investment account and, of course, taxes on traditional IRA withdrawals as mentioned above. However, income taxes—which are likely to be highly variable—can be avoided through strategic timing and account selection.
The plan touches on an issue that the couple does not seem to have faced: the reality that Harry will not be able to continue to work in perpetuity, and that healthcare costs for the couple will continue to rise even while the income that currently covers healthcare costs disappears. This decrease in income and increase in costs means there will be a widening deficit in the couple's budget, which will place increasing strain on the substantial but not inordinate amount of retirement savings they have amassed.
If the couple waits to collect Social Security until both are aged 70, the combined income from these benefits and the pension payments Harry receives will equal $74,000—$2,000 more than current annual expenses. However, this will quite possibly be less than expenses when healthcare costs are added to the equation. Insurance premiums alone could well be close to or even over $2,000 per month, let alone per year, and this is not accounted for in the $6,000 estimate provided by the couple. Extra funds will continue to be available from the Roth IRAs and from what will likely be a sizeable amount left in the traditional IRA, but a reduction in monthly expenses to increase the longevity of current funds might be recommended.
The above plan will all but certainly ensure that Harry and Sally are able to continue much in the same lifestyle for the rest of their lives, though some adjustments will be necessary and a regular review of the situation is recommended. The primary goal of this financial review having been met, it is also worthwhile to make certain recommendations regarding the planning of the estate. If care is taken not to draw down the retirement accounts' principal too steeply, there will likely be several tens of thousands, if not a hundred thousand dollars, left in the couple's estate after both have passed.
How this is to be disbursed is a matter for personal discussion; however, the couple could consider taking out additional whole life insurance policies at a certain point as long as they build cash value relatively quickly. Life insurance benefits avoid many of the taxes associated with inheritance and can be a useful vehicle for transferring wealth to loved ones. A trust for Chad's special needs child to ensure long-term care and funding is available should also be considered.
Harry and Sally are in a solid position, though it will take care and planning to ensure that they remain on sure footing into the future. Taking a conservative approach in regard to future taxation is wise, and taking tax hits now so as to avoid what will likely be higher taxes in the future is recommended. Postponing Social Security benefits and taking other steps to manage income now and in the future will help to ensure a long and happy retirement with minimal impact on lifestyle.
You’re 99% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.