This paper examines the ethical dilemmas that arise from the use of information technology, focusing on two central issues: privacy and intellectual property. It argues that traditional ethical frameworks struggle to keep pace with rapid technological development, particularly when organizational or governmental interests conflict with individual rights. Drawing on Myers and Miller's Aristotelian perspective, the paper discusses how governments — including New Zealand's approach to data matching and a 2006 Spanish court ruling on music downloads — have attempted to balance competing interests. The paper concludes that while legislative and judicial responses offer partial solutions, the tension between collective benefit and individual rights remains unresolved.
Information technology is a relatively recent phenomenon in our everyday political, social, and private lives. As such, centuries-old understandings of ethics and morality cannot easily be reconciled with the ever-growing development of information technology. There are numerous cases in which information technology poses ethical dilemmas. In general, such cases occur when the good of an organization — whether government or company — conflicts with the good of the individual. The questions of privacy and intellectual property are two prominent issues where information technology generates serious ethical dilemmas.
In most democratic countries, the right to privacy is protected by law. It is an aspect of human dignity as well as civil liberty. A dilemma arises, however, because large volumes of private data are today stored in computer databases by governments, organizations, business companies, and human rights advocacy groups. There is a fundamental tension in these situations because individuals' private data may be used for the good of a group while simultaneously violating individual rights to privacy.
As Myers and Miller (1996) explain, "The information that is kept about people in an information system is property, and as such this property may be very valuable to the owner and user of the system. However, the good of the organization that uses this information may be in conflict with the good of the individual" (p. 155). This conflict between institutional benefit and personal privacy sits at the heart of many contemporary debates about data governance.
Intellectual property is another area where information technology poses an ethical dilemma. The laws of most developed countries protect individual and corporate copyright and maintain strict regulations, sometimes imposing severe penalties for violations. Yet information technology today makes it far easier to copy copyrighted material and share it with others.
The dilemma is compounded by two competing concerns. On one side, copyright holders may abuse monopoly powers. On the other, the illegal copying and distribution of software programs costs rights-holders billions of dollars. A further dimension exists because in some countries — such as Spain — downloading music for private use was ruled legal (Tremlett, 2006), even though this practice may reduce royalty payments owed to music producers. The tension between intellectual property rights and open access to information remains one of the defining ethical challenges of the digital era.
"Legislation and court rulings attempt to balance competing interests"
Information technology continues to create genuine ethical dilemmas that traditional moral frameworks cannot fully resolve. Whether the issue is the storage of private data by large organizations or the unauthorized copying of copyrighted material, the core tension is the same: the good of the collective often comes at a cost to the individual. Legislative and judicial responses — such as New Zealand's data-matching rules and the Spanish court's ruling on music downloads — offer partial and context-specific solutions, but a universally satisfying resolution to these conflicts has yet to emerge.
You’re 62% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.