Ethical Issues in Counseling Teenagers with Alcoholism
This paper examines the ethical issues that arise when counseling adolescents with alcoholism and substance abuse disorders. Topics covered include the minimum contents of informed consent in psychotherapeutic settings, the challenges posed by dual relationships and boundary violations, and the use of psychological testing in personnel selection. The paper also addresses rules governing sexual intimacy with clients and former clients, personal psychotherapy as a graduate training requirement, deception in research, and the special concerns and benefits of outpatient treatment settings. Additional sections describe minimum HIPAA requirements for small clinics, the ways in which psychologists can become involved in fraudulent practices, and professional responsibilities in court-ordered competency evaluations.
- Introduction: Overview of ethics challenges in adolescent alcohol counseling
- Minimum Contents of Informed Consent for Psychotherapy: Informed consent requirements and psychotherapy application
- Dual Relationships and Psychological Testing in Personnel Selection: Boundary ethics and CPA decision-making model for testing
- Sexual Intimacy Rules and Personal Psychotherapy in Graduate Training: Sexual conduct prohibitions and therapist training requirements
- Special Concerns, Outpatient Benefits, and HIPAA Requirements: Outpatient care tradeoffs, domestic violence vignette, and HIPAA
- Fraudulent Practices, Professional Responsibilities, and Competency Evaluations: How psychologists encounter fraud and competency hearing duties
- Conclusion: Summary of ethical topics and key research findings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Systematically organizes a broad range of professional ethics topics under clearly delineated headings, making it easy to follow the progression from clinical consent issues to legal and regulatory responsibilities.
- Integrates direct quotations from peer-reviewed sources effectively, allowing the paper to demonstrate engagement with scholarly literature rather than relying solely on paraphrase.
- Uses a concrete vignette involving a domestic violence case to ground abstract ethical principles in a realistic clinical scenario, demonstrating applied ethical reasoning.
- Incorporates a decision-making table modeled on the Canadian Psychological Association's framework, showing how structured models can guide practical ethical choices in personnel selection.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied ethical analysis by mapping professional codes of conduct (APA Ethics Code, HIPAA, state licensing standards) onto specific clinical situations. Rather than treating ethics abstractly, the author consistently asks what a practitioner should do in a given scenario, using the decision-making table and vignette as anchors. This technique bridges theoretical ethical frameworks and real-world clinical dilemmas.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction framing the unique challenges of treating adolescent alcoholics. A single extended "Review and Discussion" section covers informed consent, dual relationships, psychological testing, sexual intimacy rules, personal psychotherapy requirements, outpatient treatment concerns, HIPAA compliance, fraudulent practices, and court-ordered competency evaluations — each addressed in its own subsection. The conclusion synthesizes the main findings. The structure is topical rather than argumentative, suited to a comprehensive survey of professional ethics topics.
Introduction
Counselors charged with treating young people who abuse substances in general and alcohol in particular are faced with challenging issues as they seek to formulate timely and effective clinical interventions using evidence-based protocols. These young people are frequently abusing other substances as well, and their involvement with law enforcement and premarital sex further exacerbates their condition. Indeed, treating anyone suffering from alcoholism is a daunting enterprise, but these problems are especially pronounced with teenage alcoholics given their propensity for experimentation and proclivity for impulsive behaviors.
To gain fresh insights in these areas, this paper reviews the relevant literature to identify ethical issues involved in counseling teenagers with alcoholism, including informed consent contents in psychotherapeutic settings, dual relationships, and psychological testing in personnel selection. A discussion concerning the rules governing sexual intimacy with clients and former clients is followed by a discussion of personal psychotherapy as a requirement of a graduate training program, including an examination of deception in research. Next, an assessment of special concerns and particular benefits of an outpatient setting is followed by a description of the relevant minimum HIPAA requirements. Finally, a discussion concerning how psychologists become involved with fraudulent practices is followed by an evaluation of professional responsibilities. A summary of the research and important findings are presented in the conclusion.
Minimum Contents of Informed Consent for Psychotherapy
Adolescents suffering from substance abuse issues have a right to understand and approve of any treatment in a process known as informed consent. Informed consent is required for all medical and research procedures based on the guiding principle that people who undergo these procedures have a fundamental right to be informed concerning the implications of the treatment and to provide their consent with a complete understanding of those implications (Barnes & Murdin, 2001). According to Barnes and Murdin, "Informed consent means that an individual grants to someone the permission to do something they would not have the right to do without such permission. Need for consent arises from the recognition of the individual's right to autonomy and self-determination" (p. 117). The complete understanding of the treatment involved in a psychotherapeutic setting is regarded as an essential element of informed consent, but this level of understanding is not always attainable depending on the cognitive and emotional capabilities of the clients involved (Barnes & Murdin, 2001). In these cases, therapists should consider alternative methods of obtaining informed consent (Barnes & Murdin, 2001).
Given the universal applicability of informed consent for medical treatment, it is not surprising that a growing number of authorities maintain that informed consent is also recommended for psychotherapy. In this regard, Croarkin and Berg (2003) report that many authorities have concluded that informed consent should include information relevant to the client's decision. According to Croarkin and Berg:
This includes treatment contracting, information about the effectiveness and safety of therapy, as well as alternatives and consequences of no therapy. However, applying this doctrine to psychotherapy is challenging due to the diversity of psychotherapists, the myriad of variables inherent in the process of psychotherapy, and the potential risk of contaminating the process of psychotherapy with this information. (p. 384)
Advocates of informed consent for psychotherapeutic settings maintain that this procedure is necessary in order to "protect patients' rights to their best interests, empower them to exercise control in their treatment, and provide a means for legal recourse should their rights be violated" (Croarkin & Berg, 2003, p. 384). In addition, informed consent for psychotherapy can provide significant psychotherapeutic benefits. In this regard, Croarkin and Berg report that:
This interactive educational process may hone patients' self-esteem, encourage autonomy, defend against pernicious regression, and establish their active role in the therapeutic process, setting the groundwork for the therapeutic alliance and for effective psychotherapy. This process may also broaden treatment options for patients and distribute liability more judiciously. Specifically, liability is transferred from the psychotherapist to the therapeutic dyad of patient and therapist. (2003, p. 384)
Notwithstanding these considerations, the minimum contents of an informed consent for psychotherapeutic purposes consist of two elements: (a) disclosure of information the client needs to make an informed decision concerning participation in therapy, and (b) free consent to therapy without experiencing undue influence from others (Charman, 2004). In this regard, Charman advises that "Consent is grounded in the view that adult clients are fully autonomous human beings who deserve the freedom to make decisions about therapy that they exercise in other aspects of their lives" (2004, p. 350). Not only do all clients, including teenagers, have a right to informed consent, they also have a right to undergo therapy without becoming emotionally or romantically involved with their therapists — issues discussed further below.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.