This paper offers a critical review of Knapp and VandeCreek's (2001) article "Ethical Issues in Personality Assessment in Forensic Psychology." The review examines the article's qualitative, literature-based approach to identifying ethical challenges forensic psychologists face, particularly around expert witness testimony and personality assessment. It highlights the authors' use of real-world examples, references to the APA Ethics Code, and their goal of preparing psychology professionals to recognize and navigate ethically complex situations. The review concludes that the article's practical orientation and grounding in lived professional experience make it a valuable resource for both students and practitioners in forensic psychology.
Knapp and VandeCreek (2001) is a qualitative article with elements of a literature review. There are no formal reports, tables, graphs, or content related to a case study or quantitative research study. The article does, however, provide valuable context for examining ethical issues in personality assessment within the field of forensic psychology. The authors offer valid examples and spend time clarifying definitions and terminology relevant to the subject. As a qualitative work, Knapp and VandeCreek provide context for their research questions and conclusions, alongside examples and counterexamples that illustrate their points. "Ethical Issues in Personality Assessment in Forensic Psychology" is part exposition, part qualitative research, and part literature and contextual review.
This article focuses on the evolving role of the forensic psychologist as an expert. It seeks to identify, and in some ways troubleshoot, the ethical situations that may arise as a result of this emerging professional role. It was notable to read that psychologists debate among themselves whether they should be permitted to testify as expert witnesses in a court of law. Many readers might assume that testifying is simply part of the job; however, the authors also make the point that most doctoral programs do not provide preparation or training in this area of practice — one that is nonetheless becoming increasingly common.
"Reviews practical examples and APA Ethics Code guidance"
"Summarizes findings on ethical risks in forensic work"
"Ethical Issues in Personality Assessment in Forensic Psychology" is more practical in orientation than many comparable articles. It features a substantial number of real-world examples that are plausible and reasonable. Many of the situations described might appear innocent or unremarkable to an untrained observer, yet each contains a distinct ethical risk or implication. The article demonstrates its value in precisely this way: the ideas presented are not merely theoretical, but are grounded in the lived experience of professional psychological practice.
Overall, Knapp and VandeCreek's article makes a meaningful contribution to the field by addressing ethical preparation in forensic psychology in an accessible, example-driven way. By anchoring their discussion to the APA Ethics Code and drawing on realistic professional scenarios, the authors provide a resource that is as useful for students entering the field as it is for experienced practitioners seeking to navigate an increasingly complex professional landscape.
Kalmbach, K. C., & Lyons, P. M. (2006). Ethical issues in conducting forensic evaluations. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2(3), 261–288.
Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (2001). Ethical issues in personality assessment in forensic psychology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 242–254.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.