This paper summarizes and analyzes four academic and policy articles on key aspects of the global financial crisis. The first examines the European sovereign debt crisis and the need to restructure troubled Eurozone economies. The second explores the Federal Reserve's role in the subprime mortgage collapse and its evolving regulatory responsibilities. The third assesses China's government-directed economic response during the 2008–2009 downturn. The fourth considers how financial institutions deploy compliance technology to manage risk, highlighting the limitations of automated systems when human judgment and regulatory transparency are insufficient.
The European financial crisis has been driven by rising borrowing costs for EU member nations and the mounting expense of bailing out Eurozone countries in financial distress. EU nations that use the Euro have faced a crisis among certain high-debt countries, requiring bailouts for Greece and Ireland, with Portugal and Spain also considered likely candidates for assistance. Postponing the restructuring of high-interest debts has deepened the crisis rather than resolving the problems faced by insolvent countries.
Massive transfer payments from stronger Eurozone economies, such as Germany, to the failed economies of Greece and Ireland have made investors nervous and discouraged investment at a critical time. The central argument of the source article is that the debts of troubled countries must be restructured promptly in order to create sustainable payment arrangements, restore market confidence, and secure future payments.
Creditors will also have to shoulder some of the burden of bailing out Ireland and Greece in order to allow those troubled economies to recover and build sufficient cash reserves to support their banking systems. Failing to restructure now carries the risk of pulling the broader Eurozone deeper into financial crisis.
Expanding access to credit for home buyers has been a longstanding goal of the federal government, supported by several federal agencies and legislative initiatives. One objective of the Federal Reserve has been to increase mortgage availability for minority and low-income buyers by subsidizing loans and acting as a lender of last resort. In recent years, the private sector created expanded credit access for subprime mortgages, which was accompanied by Fed resistance to regulating the subprime mortgage industry. The Fed's core mission — making monetary policy to achieve long-term economic growth — makes it poorly suited for policing specific industry practices such as subprime lending.
The growth of privately held mortgages led banks to extend credit to riskier borrowers, reducing the share of government-secured loans. The private mortgage industry was highly susceptible to fluctuations in housing prices, and when home values fell in 2008, the impact spread to other asset-backed securities — an unexpected consequence of the subprime market's collapse.
The failure of hedge funds caused by overinvestment in the collapsed subprime market called for better risk management, but since this was not mandated by the Fed, it did not occur. Hedge funds are designed to accommodate risky investments, and the Fed was challenged by the growing scale of private investing occurring outside of traditional banks and lending institutions. The proliferation of investment instruments outside of normal banking channels created an entirely new network of influences on the Fed. Rather than making broad policy decisions on interest rates to shape risk-taking behavior, the Fed increasingly became a source of credit for specific companies — a dynamic that encouraged organizations to take outsized risks, knowing a taxpayer-funded bailout was possible if those risks materialized.
The increasing role of private industry in lending has created a regulatory gray area for the Fed and raised the prospect of greater oversight from political leaders. The Fed will need to assume a broader regulatory role over non-banking industries in order to craft effective policies that meaningfully influence the risk-taking behavior of organizations.
The Chinese economy began its gradual transition toward a market economy in the late 1970s. The government has maintained control over economic policy — particularly during periods of crisis — while allowing market forces to drive growth. Opening to foreign investment and integrating into international financial markets in recent decades has sustained economic expansion, but has also tied China's economy to global market fluctuations. China's banks remain largely state-owned, and the structure of the economy has been carefully managed by the government even as markets operate under market-based principles.
Chinese households are historically high savers and do not rely heavily on credit, a characteristic that has provided banks with greater capital reserves and less debt exposure. The exchange rate has remained stable for many years, though critics have argued it is kept artificially low, suggesting the currency may be undervalued.
China experienced an economic downturn during the 2008–2009 global financial crisis just as other countries did. Decreased demand for Chinese exports was the primary consequence of the global downturn, resulting in job losses and factory closures across many regions. Despite this, China's economy continued to grow, largely due to proactive planning by Chinese leaders at the onset of the U.S. financial collapse. When the U.S. economy contracted, China implemented tighter regulations and policies affecting its real economy — including government-funded stimulus projects designed to create employment — recognizing that its real economy directly influences its financial economy.
A stimulus package implemented for 2009–2010 increased government spending on infrastructure across multiple sectors to generate jobs and stabilize the economy. China typically maintains tight control over the money supply due to inflation concerns, but during the financial crisis it cut interest rates and lowered reserve requirements to expand liquidity.
China has been criticized for undervaluing its currency to gain a competitive advantage in exports, a charge it has denied. Simultaneously, China has criticized the United States for failing to control the value of the dollar — a concern with some justification given that China is the largest creditor of the United States. Despite tensions between the two nations, they are becoming increasingly interdependent as the dominant economies in the world.
In the information age, the availability of data is staggering, particularly in the financial sector. To manage the challenge of analyzing massive data volumes for risk management and regulatory compliance, financial institutions have turned to sophisticated computer systems. Software companies have responded to the needs of financial firms by offering suites of applications designed to help institutions manage and analyze data in accordance with stricter regulations.
However, heavy reliance on technology carries significant pitfalls. People remain involved in designing the formulas and assumptions that measure risk and determine outcomes. Organizational leadership retains ultimate responsibility for the performance of its processes, including any bias or distortion that enters the system — yet this responsibility has not always prevented such problems from occurring.
Government regulation of financial institutions is designed to mitigate risk, but because risk arises from many sources, it is difficult to craft regulations that are simultaneously broad enough and specific enough to address all dimensions of risk. Regulation is nonetheless necessary: after the damage has been done, there is often no entity remaining to be held accountable and no mechanism for compensating those harmed by bad actors.
Current regulatory frameworks require companies to establish certain controls for privacy, accuracy, and accountability, while giving management broad discretion in how to implement the required processes. The banking industry is heavily regulated and must maintain internal controls to manage risk, protect customer privacy, detect money laundering, and hold financial advisors to high standards of accountability. In the wake of the recent economic crisis, calls have grown for expanded regulation of both financial and non-financial industries.
Legislation enacted by Congress is necessarily broad, with the details of implementation left to administrative agencies to fill in through regulation. Businesses are generally given wide discretion in achieving compliance by developing their own systems and processes to provide the information necessary for effective oversight. The growing complexity of financial instruments and compliance requirements has made extensive use of computer technology essential.
Computer programs are well suited to large-scale data projects because they can organize and analyze vast quantities of information to identify trends and patterns within defined parameters. This capability can lead to automated processes of data collection, analysis, and decision-making with minimal human intervention.
Third-party vendors develop software to help organizations manage risk and maintain compliance, though such software still requires end users to define the inputs used to track and measure user-defined risks. Reducing the number of decisions made by human operators significantly lowers the risk of errors in data entry or analysis. Automated audit systems also help organizations assess the effectiveness of their processes by flagging transactions outside normal parameters for further review.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.