This paper examines how the legacy of colonialism and imperialism introduced non-European aesthetic traditions into early Art Deco design. Through analysis of five representative works — Ruhlmann's dressing table, Cartier's Egyptian vanity case, Eileen Gray's lacquered screen, Pierre Legrain's stool, and Rene Buthaud's stoneware vase — the paper traces the use of exotic materials, motifs, and forms drawn from Egyptian, sub-Saharan African, Japanese, and Oriental traditions. Together, these objects illustrate how the blending of familiar and exotic was central to the Art Deco movement of the 1920s and reflected the cultural confluences of the early twentieth century.
The paper demonstrates formal visual analysis applied to decorative arts objects. Rather than merely describing pieces, the author interprets design choices — such as the sarcophagus shape of the Cartier vanity case or the lacquer technique on Gray's screen — as deliberate cultural references. This object-centered analytical method is characteristic of art history and design history writing at the undergraduate level.
The paper opens with a contextual paragraph establishing the historical conditions that made "exotic" aesthetics available to Art Deco designers. It then moves through five objects in chronological order, with each body paragraph functioning as a mini-analysis. The final paragraph of the last object section serves double duty as a conclusion, synthesizing across all five pieces to reinforce the central claim about the blending of familiar and exotic at the close of the imperial age.
A long era of colonialism and imperialism led to a confluence of cultures at the start of the twentieth century. Art and design motifs could borrow from a perceived "exotic" — an aesthetic drawn from non-European cultures including those of Africa, India, the South Pacific, and the Far East. The exotic made its way into Art Deco art, architecture, and design in terms of shapes, forms, motifs, colors, and materials. Especially in the early Art Deco movement during the 1920s, so-called exotic materials such as zebra skin and dark woods made their way into furniture and decor.
Jacques-Émile Ruhlmann's dressing table from 1925 combines solid oak with ebony and ivory inlay design. The ebony and ivory both represent the exotic. The overall effect combines the familiar with the exotic, resulting in new shapes, forms, and textures. The dressing table's shape, furthermore, is reminiscent of Egyptian papyrus and has a lotus flower form.
Even more overtly Egyptian in its motif and media is the Cartier vanity case produced in 1925. The case is shaped unequivocally and unapologetically like an Egyptian sarcophagus. At its head is the image of an Egyptian sphinx head, which can also be construed as a funereal or mummy mask. Along the sides of the vanity case, the designers applied purely Egyptian decorative elements such as palm fronds — the type that frequently adorn the column tops of an Egyptian temple. The figurine carved into the bone-top lid is also in Egyptian design. The bone, inlaid semi-precious, and precious stones are all considered exotic materials that blend well with the Egyptian motif. Cartier has produced several similar pieces that draw on the exotic mystique and aesthetic of ancient Egypt.
These five Art Deco pieces combine elements that might have been considered exotic to the European designer and consumer alike. The blending of familiar and exotic is emblematic of the early twentieth century and the close of the age of imperialism.
You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.