This paper examines the psychological phenomenon of false memories, with a central focus on Roediger and McDermott's landmark 1995 study on false recall using associated word lists. The paper situates the study within a broader body of literature dating back to 1932, noting how false memories arise in contexts ranging from traumatic abuse to controlled laboratory experiments. It traces the study's two experiments, highlights participants' striking confidence in false recollections, and discusses the researchers' conclusion that all memory is constructive rather than reproductive. The paper argues that this research meaningfully advances scientific understanding of how and why false memories form.
The paper models effective literature-review synthesis: it moves from a general overview of the false-memory field to a detailed examination of one study, then evaluates that study's contribution and limitations. This funnel structure — broad context narrowing to specific evidence — is a standard and effective approach in psychology literature reviews.
The paper opens with a general definition and significance of false memories, transitions into a survey of prior research, then devotes the bulk of its analysis to the two experiments in Roediger and McDermott (1995). It evaluates methodology, reports findings, addresses theoretical conclusions, and closes with a brief summary of the study's ongoing relevance. A references section in APA format concludes the work.
Research indicates that many subjects of abuse or other traumatic experiences often develop false memories. They remember events either differently than they actually occurred, or they forget them entirely. One study by Roediger and McDermott examined undergraduates and how they processed memories. Deep and shallow encoding was used to help participants remember lists of words. Some remembered the words correctly, while others remembered them falsely. The deeper encoding method provided more reliable results.
Many scientists and psychologists have studied the formation of false memories and why they occur. False memories can distort a person's view of the past and their sense of self. Most experts believe that for a person to feel psychologically whole, they must reconstruct these memories; otherwise, the psyche risks becoming fragmented in several directions.
Research on false memories began as early as 1932, although the literature and scope of study have grown considerably over the past few decades. The broad base of scholarship on the topic includes several studies examining false memories and the conditions under which they arise. Many studies center on past sexual or violent abuse that the victim misremembers or blocks out entirely. Many studies also seek to understand why people generate these false memories in the first place.
In the Roediger and McDermott study, the researchers attempted to examine undergraduate students to see how and why they remembered lists of associated words differently. They write, "Most evidence has been collected in paradigms that use sentences, prose passages, slide sequences, or videotapes" (Roediger & McDermott, 1995, p. 803). Their study is distinguished by its use of word lists and by the particular way in which those lists were constructed. It is worth noting that their research closely follows an earlier word-list study conducted in 1959 that had been largely overlooked by subsequent researchers.
The researchers cite previous studies and compare their findings to those earlier results. They argue that their study differs because it employed different techniques and demonstrated that participants were highly confident their responses were correct — and experienced them as genuine recollections — something that prior studies had not established as clearly.
There has been considerable research on false memories over the past several decades, due in large part to increased reports of false memories documented by psychiatrists and psychologists. This study contributes to that body of knowledge because, rather than examining memorization or cued recall, it investigates free recall and the spontaneous development of false memories. It is also significant because it demonstrates a high rate of false recall in situations of this kind. The researchers write, "The false-alarm rate for the critical nonpresented items was much higher than for other related words that had not been presented" (Roediger & McDermott, 1995, p. 806). Furthermore, large numbers of participants were entirely confident that their false memories had genuinely appeared on the lists, even when those items had not been presented at all.
This study advances the existing literature by opening a deeper level of inquiry into false memories. In one sense, it revisits the 1959 research conducted by Deese, since it uses the word lists he originally developed. It also specifically uses the lists that Deese's study identified as producing the highest rates of false memories — a methodological choice that could be seen as introducing a degree of bias, given that the researchers had access to prior results when designing their study.
False memories are a fascinating piece of the psychological puzzle, and continued studies such as this one will continue to address how these memories are formed and what function they play in the brain. Much of the other literature in this field examines false memories in the context of abusive relationships and trauma, but the Roediger and McDermott study focuses on a different mechanism, yielding some surprising and theoretically important results.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.