This paper examines the relationship between television food advertising and children's dietary habits in the United States. Drawing on peer-reviewed research from the journal Pediatrics and a Kaiser Family Foundation study, the paper demonstrates that children from high-television-use households consume significantly more processed foods and fewer fruits and vegetables. It explores why advertisers target a demographic with no income — citing the "nag factor" and lifetime brand loyalty — and argues that media influence has fundamentally altered American eating patterns by displacing traditional mealtime foods with heavily advertised convenience snacks.
Because of children's psychological susceptibility to media influence, American dietary habits and food preferences have been significantly altered. According to the peer-reviewed journal Pediatrics: "The vast majority of money spent on food advertising comes from branded food manufacturers and fast-food chains, and television is the primary medium used by these companies" (Coon, Goldberg, Rogers, & Tucker, 2001). The same study found that "children from families with high television use derived, on average, 6% more of their total daily energy intake from meats; 5% more from pizza, salty snacks, and soda; and nearly 5% less of their energy intake from fruits, vegetables, and juices than did children from families with low television use" (Coon, Goldberg, Rogers, & Tucker, 2001).
According to a 2007 study by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a non-profit public interest organization, 34% of all food advertising aimed at children is for candy and snacks, and half of all advertisements shown during specifically child-oriented programming were for processed food. "Children under 12 see an average of 21 ads a day, or more than 7,600 a year" (Graham & Kinsley, 2007).
This raises an obvious question: why do advertisers focus their food advertising on a demographic with no independent income? The answer lies in the so-called "nag factor" — children pressure their parents to purchase advertised goods — and in the recognition that children are the consumers of the future. Acquiring a consumer in infancy often means retaining a consumer for life. As Sharon Beder explains: "Children represent three different markets. In addition to the direct money that children spend and the money they influence, children also represent a third major market — and perhaps the most significant — and that is the future market" (Beder, 1998).
Advertisers understand that brand loyalties and consumer habits formed when children are young and impressionable tend to persist into adulthood. Targeting children is therefore a long-term investment in future purchasing behavior, not merely a short-term sales strategy.
"Advertising displaces traditional meals with processed snacks"
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.