This essay compares two foundational American autobiographies: Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography and the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass. Despite their vastly different circumstances—Franklin's indentured servitude to his brother versus Douglass's enslavement in the South—both narratives reveal striking parallels in their authors' valuation of work, their yearning for freedom, and their self-made ascent. The paper examines how both men concealed their intellectual ambitions while young, relocated to establish themselves professionally, and used their writing to advance their ideals. However, it also highlights crucial differences: Franklin's generally optimistic view of America and his relative ease of escape contrast sharply with Douglass's constant struggle against oppression and his mission to demonstrate the humanity of enslaved people to white readers.
Although Benjamin Franklin and Frederick Douglass began their lives on opposite sides of the racial and economic divide in America, their personal narratives contain many striking parallel features. Both suffered forms of bondage—Franklin endured indentured servitude to his brother, while Douglass experienced actual slavery in the South—and both later rose to prominence as authors and self-made men. Their shared emphasis on the dignity of labor, the yearning for intellectual freedom, and the determination to transcend their early circumstances reveals a common thread running through these foundational American life stories.
Both men held work in exceptionally high esteem. Franklin saw his thrift and industry as the primary reasons for his success, viewing these virtues as the foundation of his rise. Douglass, for his part, criticized slavery precisely because it eroded the enslaved person's ability to work hard and to profit from their own labor. In both cases, work represented not merely subsistence but dignity, autonomy, and the possibility of advancement. This shared valuation of labor appears throughout their narratives as a moral and practical principle.
Furthermore, both men are depicted chafing at the intellectual restrictions placed upon them during their youth. Douglass's longing to learn to read is one of the most poignant moments in his Narrative. While literacy itself was not denied to the young Franklin, he faced a different but parallel form of suppression: he had to conceal his authorship of the editorials he published in his brother's newspaper. Similarly, Douglass had to conceal his urge to learn to read as a slave, keeping his knowledge of the alphabet secret even as he was determined to escape slavery's confines. Both men illustrate a common yearning for freedom—specifically, the freedom to develop their intellectual capacities and to claim ownership of their own words and thoughts.
To establish themselves professionally, both men had to leave their places of origin and reinvent themselves in new locations. Franklin fled his brother's control in Boston and traveled to Philadelphia, where he began his own print shop. His industry and sobriety stood in stark contrast to his first business associate, who preferred drinking to work. Douglass, of course, had to escape the enslaved South and flee north to freedom. In both cases, geographic relocation was not merely a change of address but a deliberate act of self-creation—both men functioning as entrepreneurs who wrested themselves out of their challenging personal circumstances to pursue new lives.
This pattern of escape and reinvention marks both men as self-made individuals, a characterization central to both of their autobiographical projects. By narrating their own ascent from humble or oppressive beginnings to positions of prominence, Franklin and Douglass each present themselves as evidence of what determination and talent could achieve in America. Yet the ease and outcome of their escapes differed dramatically, a distinction that would shape the very different messages their narratives conveyed.
Because Douglass was located in an openly hostile country that legally enslaved him, his personal trajectory was fundamentally different from Franklin's. Franklin took a relatively positive view of America: he was able to escape his brother relatively easily and was not pursued. He successfully began his printing shop and later established a newspaper and almanac through his own efforts. This affirmed in his eyes the value of frugality, ambition, and optimism about American prospects. His narrative emphasizes the American Dream as achievable through virtue and hard work.
Douglass, in sharp contrast, constantly had to fight those who enslaved him merely to retain his dignity and humanity. Throughout the various positions he occupied during his life in slavery, he was repeatedly beaten and degraded. His opposition came not from a single authority figure like Franklin's brother, but from an entire systemic apparatus designed to deny his personhood. Where Franklin's obstacles were largely personal and circumstantial, Douglass's were structural and violent. This fundamental difference shaped how each man presented his life story and what he hoped his narrative would accomplish.
"Different purposes and obstacles shaped each author's autobiographical vision"
You’re 74% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.