This paper compares and contrasts Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper" and Jack London's "To Build a Fire," examining how both stories explore human survival against powerful antagonistic forces. In Gilman's story, the enemy is the late-nineteenth-century medical establishment and a society that suppressed women's intellectual lives; in London's story, it is indifferent natural forces. The paper argues that both narratives warn against isolation and loneliness, showing how each protagonist ultimately fails to survive — one descending into madness, the other freezing to death — because of the destructive effects of being alone and unheard.
The paper demonstrates the use of a thematic comparative framework: rather than summarizing each work separately, the student identifies shared thematic concerns (isolation, antagonistic forces, failed survival) and uses those as the organizing principle for analysis. This approach allows meaningful contrast — the man ignores good advice out of arrogance, while the woman is ignored despite her self-awareness — without losing sight of what the two works share.
The paper opens with a thesis establishing the shared survival theme and the key distinction between the two antagonists. It then dedicates two sections to Gilman, drawing on biographical context before moving to the story itself. A central section addresses London's story, focusing on the theme of aloneness. The comparative section brings both protagonists together for direct contrast, and the conclusion ties the dual themes — hostile forces and isolation — back to the shared outcome of failure.
"The Yellow Wallpaper" by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and "To Build a Fire" by Jack London are two classic short stories dealing with humanity's struggle for survival against powerful antagonistic forces. In Gilman's story, this power is demonstrated in the form of the medical community and society, while in London's story it is nature itself. There is a meaningful difference between these forces: one story does not hold nature responsible for what happens to the protagonist, while the other finds no enemy other than nature itself.
Both stories also speak against isolation and loneliness. Isolation is the worst possible way of treating a person because it leads only to further destruction and decay of the human mind, body, and soul, as evidenced in "The Yellow Wallpaper." And it is loneliness — combined with a stubborn desire to survive without anyone's help — that ends the man's life in "To Build a Fire."
The fact that "The Yellow Wallpaper" is an attack directed at the medical community of the late nineteenth century is supported by the writer's own confession. Gilman admits that after suffering serious melancholia for years, she was ordered to undertake complete rest in isolation, which only worsened her illness to the point that she was on the verge of a nervous breakdown. She was also refused the pursuit of any intellectual activity, which further aggravated her condition. This experience prompted her to speak against such medical intervention, and thus "The Yellow Wallpaper" was born:
"For many years I suffered from a severe and continuous nervous breakdown tending to melancholia — and beyond. [I went] to a noted specialist in nervous diseases, the best known in the country. This wise man put me to bed and applied the rest cure, to which a still-good physique responded so promptly that he concluded there was nothing much the matter with me, and sent me home with solemn advice to 'live as domestic a life as far as possible,' to 'have but two hours' intellectual life a day,' and 'never to touch pen, brush, or pencil again' as long as I lived… I went home and obeyed those directions for some three months, and came so near the borderline of utter mental ruin that I could see over." (Gilman, "Why I Wrote the Yellow Wallpaper")
Gilman's disillusionment with the medical community is also clear from the story itself, where the husband John is a physician who does not believe there is anything wrong with his wife: "John is a physician, and perhaps — (I would not say it to a living soul, of course, but this is dead paper and a great relief to my mind) — perhaps that is one reason I do not get well faster… If a physician of high standing, and one's own husband, assures friends and relatives that there is really nothing the matter with one but temporary nervous depression — a slight hysterical tendency — what is one to do?"
The woman in this story suffers as a result of the misguided advice of medical practitioners of her day, who could not connect mental illnesses to any substantive cause and therefore recommended isolation as the only cure. The society of the time did not support women's intellectual activities, and so doctors denied their mentally ill patients the right to pursue anything beyond domestic chores. This only compounded the problem, and it was this reality that led Gilman to speak out against such medical approaches. As Roberto Patarca-Montero observes, "Charlotte Perkins Gilman placed the rest cure in the cultural context of late nineteenth century. The story was a metaphor for the lives of middle-class women trapped in other people's expectations…" (Patarca-Montero, p. 4).
The two important themes in London's story are "hostile nature" and "aloneness," while the two essential themes in Gilman's story are "unwise medical community" and "isolation." When compared and contrasted, these stories are essentially about survival in the face of antagonistic forces. Both protagonists fail to survive, but in different ways. While the man dies after struggling for hours to build a fire, the mentally ill woman's condition deteriorates to the point of complete breakdown. Together, the two stories offer a powerful argument against the destructive consequences of loneliness and the failure — whether personal or societal — to heed wise counsel.
You’re 66% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.