The Global Refugee Crisis: Why Nations Must Do More for Syria
This paper presents a letter of support for the New York Times editorial "Still Failing Syria's Refugees," arguing that the Syrian refugee crisis represents a symptom of a larger, longstanding global failure to address displacement. The author examines the scale of the refugee problem—over 10 million displaced worldwide—and critiques the inadequate response from wealthy nations, including Arab states, European countries, and the United States. The paper calls for increased public awareness, greater funding for refugee processing and aid, diplomatic pressure to increase international resettlement commitments, and recognition that the most developed nations have both the capacity and moral obligation to act decisively.
- The Global Scale of Refugee Displacement: Overview of worldwide refugee crisis and US resettlement statistics
- International Responsibility and Unequal Burden-Sharing: How developed nations, UN structure, and Arab states fail refugees
- The Syrian Crisis and Systemic Failures: Specific challenges and screening concerns blocking Syrian refugee resettlement
- Concrete Solutions and Calls to Action: Multi-layered proposals for government, private sector, and public engagement
- Conclusion: A Moral Obligation: Final call for sustained commitment and resource allocation
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a specific recent editorial as an anchor point to situate the Syrian crisis within a broader historical and global context of refugee failure.
- Supports claims with concrete statistics (10.4 million refugees worldwide; US takes 70,000 per year) and specific citations to strengthen credibility.
- Employs rhetorical questions to challenge reader assumptions about which nations bear responsibility (e.g., "where are the other Arab states, and the other Muslim nations?").
- Connects abstract policy failures to human suffering (families in freezing tents) to create emotional resonance alongside logical argument.
- Proposes multi-layered solutions (public awareness, private donations, government funding, diplomatic pressure) rather than single-issue remedies.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs contrastive analysis to expose inconsistencies in global responsibility-sharing. By systematically comparing the responses of the United States, European nations, Arab states, and the UN system itself, the author reveals who is acting, who should act, and why they are failing. This technique is reinforced by citation of authoritative sources (UNHCR, Amnesty International) and references to precedent (African refugee crises), establishing that the Syrian failure is part of a pattern, not an isolated event.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with alignment to the editorial, then establishes scale through statistics. The middle sections build a critical analysis by examining three actor groups—developed Western nations, wealthy Arab states, and the UN—each revealing a layer of responsibility failure. The author then pivots to solutions, moving from awareness-raising and private donation to government spending priorities and diplomatic leverage. The conclusion reinforces the moral framing (obligation) and extends the call to action to the nation with the greatest capacity—the United States. This progression from problem identification to concrete remedy is characteristic of persuasive policy writing.
The Global Scale of Refugee Displacement
I am writing to express support for the editorial "Still Failing Syria's Refugees." The refugee problem is a serious global concern, yet few countries are truly willing to take action. However, the Syrian refugee crisis is not an isolated failure—it reflects a long history of international neglect of displaced populations.
According to the United Nations Refugee Agency, there are approximately 10.4 million refugees worldwide this year, fleeing from conflicts they did not start and do not participate in (UNHCR, 2014). The United States alone takes in 70,000 refugees per year, which represents more than half the world's total annual resettlement. This statistic alone reveals a troubling reality: despite the scale of global displacement, most countries have abdicated their humanitarian responsibilities, leaving the vast majority of refugees with no genuine hope of resettlement or safe return home.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.