Government's Role in Historic Preservation at State and Local Level
This paper examines the role of national, state, and local governments in the historic preservation process, with a focus on Florida and the city of Tallahassee. It analyzes the legislative frameworks that guide preservation efforts, explains why governments have a vested interest in protecting historic structures, and outlines the economic and cultural benefits that preservation generates. A case study of the South Monroe Area in Tallahassee illustrates how local government designates and protects historic districts. The paper argues that state governments must delegate preservation authority to local governments, which then tailor legislation to their communities, and that coordinated investment and awareness campaigns are essential to effective preservation.
- Introduction: Overview of government's preservation role and paper scope
- The Role of Government in Historic Preservation Legislation: Legislative frameworks at national, state, and local levels
- Government Interest in Historic Preservation: Economic, cultural, and architectural reasons for preservation
- Historic Preservation in Florida: Florida's statewide preservation efforts and economic impact
- Case Study: The South Monroe Area, Tallahassee: 1997 survey findings and historic district recommendation
- Legislation Applying to the Case Study: Bill C.B. 351 and South Monroe's historic zone classification
- Conclusion: Government responsibilities summarized across all levels
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from broad legislative principles to a concrete local case study, grounding abstract policy discussion in a real-world example.
- It clearly distinguishes the roles of national, state, and local government, avoiding conflation of different levels of authority.
- The inclusion of economic data — such as Florida's $4.2 billion annual economic impact from preservation — strengthens the argument for government investment.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a layered case study approach: it establishes the theoretical and legislative context first, then applies that framework to a specific geographic area (South Monroe, Tallahassee). This technique allows the reader to evaluate policy effectiveness through a measurable, documented example, making the argument more persuasive and grounded.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction to the topic and a purpose statement. It then covers the legislative role of government, followed by a section on why governments pursue preservation. A state-level overview of Florida precedes a focused local case study of Tallahassee's South Monroe Area. A dedicated section addresses the specific legislation passed in response to the 1997 survey, and a brief conclusion synthesizes the key responsibilities of government at each level.
Introduction
Historic preservation is taken up by forward-thinking governments to revitalize not only physical structures but also local economies. Structures that assume historical value may carry more than economic importance — they also represent national heritage. Governments therefore bear the responsibility of taking measures to preserve historic structures. To fulfill this responsibility, government is given the authority to devise preservation legislation. State governments, in turn, should allow local governments to participate in preservation efforts and build upon those legislative foundations.
This paper studies the role of government at the state and local level. The state government of Florida and the local government of Tallahassee, Florida, are specified as the subjects of study. The paper first identifies the role of government in devising legislation regarding historic preservation. Next, it identifies the reasons why governments should be interested in historic preservation measures. This is followed by an overview of historic preservation efforts in Florida. Finally, a case study of Tallahassee is examined with regard to preservation efforts, keeping the relevant legislation in view.
The Role of Government in Historic Preservation Legislation
Historic preservation legislation differs across state and local governments. There is no single definitive legislation that applies uniformly to all levels of government in the United States. These laws are typically customized by local governments to meet the needs of their particular communities. This allows local governments to tailor legislation to their specific circumstances — but it also means there is inconsistency and ambiguity surrounding historic preservation law, particularly as to who should have the ultimate authority over preservation decisions.
Due to this irregularity, the legislative role of governments can be broken down into two primary concerns, according to Abney (1998). Abney argues that: (1) legislation should be effective — meaning it should be capable of protecting the structures that require preservation — and (2) legislation should be able to withstand legal challenges, meaning that laws should not contradict one another. Abney thus outlines the core concerns involved in crafting legislation that reflects the genuine intent of historic structure preservation.
State governments are not typically involved in the direct regulation of historic structures. However, they are required to accept legislation formulated by the federal government and to enforce those policies. The legislative role of state government does include directing local governments toward adopting appropriate historic preservation policies. The United States Constitution empowers state governments to delegate authority to local governments; as a result, the actual preservation of historic structures takes place largely at the local level. It is local governments throughout the United States that are primarily responsible for enacting laws governing historic structure preservation. The Growth Management Act of 1985 (GMA) is one such piece of legislation that helps local governments focus on preservation activities.
Government Interest in Historic Preservation
Historic structures may hold monumental value to society because of the historical significance associated with them. Their preservation is therefore a meaningful act by government. Some historic structures also carry architectural worth, making preservation important on aesthetic and cultural grounds as well.
Beyond historic and architectural concerns, the most compelling reason for governments to act is the economic benefit generated by historic preservation. Designation of an area as historic increases property values and encourages reinvestment (Rypkema, 1997). According to Rypkema, the investment of capital by government into preservation helps create jobs within the local economy. This in turn leads to a better quality of life, as more financial activity circulates through the economy as a result of these economic impacts.
All of these factors — historical, architectural, and economic — serve as motivation for state and local governments to invest in the preservation of historic structures.
Conclusion
It is the responsibility of the state government to delegate historic preservation legislative power to local governments. Local governments then customize that legislation to best suit their particular communities. Among the other responsibilities of government in this domain are spreading awareness about historic preservation, investing in preservation directly, and providing incentives to owners of historic structures. Together, these efforts at the state and local level form a coordinated framework for safeguarding the nation's architectural and cultural heritage.
Bibliography
Abney, G. B. (1998). "Florida's Local Historic Preservation Ordinances: Maintaining Flexibility While Avoiding Vagueness Claims." Florida State University Law Review, 25:1017.
Bardon, D., and Murray, D. L. (1998). Florida's Museums and Cultural Attractions. Sarasota, FL: Pineapple Press, Inc.
Bense, J. A., Bense, Hernandez, J. L., Barnes, A., Deagan, K. A., Jackson, D. H. Jr., Littrell, V., McKeithen, L., Quina, C., Uguccioni, E., and Williams, C. (2003). Florida Historical Commission White Paper. February 20, 2003. [Online] Available at
Center for Urban Policy Research. (1997). Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Historic Trust.
City of Tallahassee, Florida. (2001). The History of the South Monroe Area. Official City of Tallahassee, Florida. [Online] Available at
Douglas, L. (1986). "Preservation and rehabilitation — an economic tool for cities." Nation's Cities Weekly, June 2.
General Assembly, The State of Georgia. (1987). Economic Development through Historic Preservation. Report of the Joint Study Committee, General Assembly, State of Georgia.
Harris, K. (2000). "Making it count: How the arts and historic preservation can make a difference in your county." Florida Counties. (November/December).
Kleinberg, E. (1997). Historical Traveler's Guide to Florida. Sarasota, FL: Pineapple Press, Inc.
McLendon, T., and Klein, J. (2003). Historic Preservation: Value Added. Explore, September 2003, Vol. 8, No. 1. Research at the University of Florida.
Rypkema, D. D. (1997). Profiting from the Past: The Impact of Historic Preservation on the North Carolina Economy. Preservation North Carolina.
Shaw, T. M. (1996). "Studying the Dollar Value of History." Preservation Forum: 4.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.