This paper examines the key differences between single-leader working groups and high performance teams, and outlines the conditions under which organizations should pursue the transition between the two. Drawing on research and real-world examples from companies such as Motorola, 3M, and Kodak, the paper identifies the characteristics that enable teams to thrive amid organizational change, including shared vision, mutual accountability, and a commitment to continuous learning. The paper also explores how workforce diversity — ethnic, racial, cultural, and gender-based — positively influences team performance, broadens the candidate pool, and improves customer engagement, ultimately arguing that diversity is both a strategic and operational asset for high-performing organizations.
The paper demonstrates effective use of quoted authority to support claims. Rather than relying solely on general assertions, it incorporates direct quotations from named practitioners — such as HR directors and vice presidents — alongside academic and managerial sources. This technique lends credibility to what might otherwise read as opinion, anchoring each argument in attributed expert testimony.
The paper opens by situating teams within broader organizational culture pressures, then defines what a "real team" is and how it differs from a working group. It transitions into guidance on when conversion is warranted, lists the characteristics teams need to survive change, and provides illustrative corporate examples. The final third pivots to diversity, covering its workforce benefits, its impact on customer experience, and empirical research on how diversity improves group output. The conclusion synthesizes the diversity and performance threads.
Research has shown that the key factor in the performance of an organization lies in its culture. Factors such as the dynamics of change, new technologies, customer demands, workforce diversity, business model challenges, stiff competition, shareholder expectations, reducing cycle times, and changing work ethics tend to pull an organization in several directions. This makes the requirement of a bond — in the form of a strong culture — all the more relevant. Good organizations therefore attempt to bring people toward a deeper sense of purpose by addressing the intangible leadership issues that make up their unique character. These powerful shared values are made actionable through the strong implementation of management processes and systems that convert ideals into actions. This requires the creation of high performance teams. (Building a High Performance Culture)
The reason why the staff in an organization needs to be brought together as a team is not simply because building teams and teamwork are generally considered good things. It is necessary to recognize that a real team has certain key characteristics. Real teams have a small number of members, and those members possess complementary skills. The members of a real team all work toward a commonly identified goal. The team has its own performance goals in addition to the individual goals of each member. Members of a real team share a common approach to working together and hold themselves mutually accountable as a team, not merely as individuals. All of this makes a real team very powerful. Leadership within a real team is shared among its members and need not conform to formal hierarchy. The results such real teams achieve are outstanding.
In contrast, single-leader groups show poor cohesion because they lack mutual accountability and do not have clear group objectives. They remain a group, with the single leader ensuring that each individual member fulfills their individual job function responsibly. (Read Me Reviews — The Wisdom of Teams)
This is the main contrast between a single-leader group and a high performance team. This does not mean it is necessary to convert all working groups into high performance teams. The nature of the challenge should be the discriminating factor. "Many challenges can be met quite nicely by an effective single-leader working group." (Read Me Reviews — The Wisdom of Teams) That said, there will always be challenges that require a real team to address them. In those cases, it is appropriate to act on converting that working group into a high performance team.
The essence of successful team building lies in linking it to specific challenges that the organization must face. Research has shown that losing focus on this requirement — and simply building team spirit because it seems like a good idea — is counterproductive, as such teams "performed worse than working groups with no team spirit at all." (Read Me Reviews — The Wisdom of Teams)
It is becoming increasingly important for organizations to make diversity an integral and integrated factor that improves the workplace and enhances the performance of its teams and groups, rather than treating it as a benefit targeted only at marginalized populations. A diverse workforce with the capacity to speak and operate within the same cultural context as a diverse customer base adds to team effectiveness in ways that may not have been previously recognized. There are already indications that the proportion of white males entering the workforce is declining. Diversity broadens the pool of candidates available to an organization. As Brenda Galligan, director of national recruiting for Mentor 4, Inc., put it: "As America becomes more and more diverse, the best people for your jobs will come from those diverse populations." (Building a Diverse Workforce to Serve Diverse Clients) Tracy Johnson, vice president of human resources for Allegis Group, added: "If you don't build a diverse workforce, you really limit your ability to find qualified candidates for open positions. Diversity broadens the candidate pool." (Building a Diverse Workforce to Serve Diverse Clients)
Diversity also helps maximize customer experiences and thereby expands an organization's customer base. Any organization seeks to make the best use of every opportunity when a customer or potential customer makes contact with it. In the words of Ron Hetrick, director of labor market analytics for Mentor 4, Inc., "Your chances of a positive experience are so much better when your organization reflects those people you are providing services for." (Building a Diverse Workforce to Serve Diverse Clients) In practical terms, this means diversity enables better customer contact by team members and allows for wider distribution of products and services. With a growing Hispanic population, for example, it makes sense to have Hispanic employees who can engage effectively with that segment of the market. The presence of a diverse workforce enables teams to achieve higher performance through the representative nature of their composition. This is a powerful tool that, when used wisely, can help teams perform better and be more competitive in the marketplace. (Building a Diverse Workforce to Serve Diverse Clients)
Studies on several aspects of diversity tend to show that it impacts groups and teams in a positive manner. Research indicates that gender diversity aids in improving the task performance of a group or team. Other studies show that racial or ethnic diversity makes it possible for differences in views, expertise, and attitudes to be more widely communicated within a group or team, producing outcomes that are better accepted across the group or team as a whole. Organizations that have moved toward collectivism and cooperation in their diversity efforts have increased the performance potential of their groups and teams, and thereby the overall performance of their organizations.
Another study indicates that while ethnically diverse groups do not necessarily generate more ideas during a brainstorming task, the quality of the ideas put forward is higher than those generated by homogenous groups. Thus diversity does have a positive impact on groups and teams, though the optimal proportion of representation still warrants further study. (Undelivered Promises from the HR Profession: A Plea to Return to a More Defensible Motivation for Embracing Diversity)
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.