Self-Care in Top Management Teams and Firm Performance
This paper examines the role of self-care among top management team (TMT) members as a strategic organizational resource. Drawing on Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory and the Resource-Based View (RBV) of the firm, the paper proposes four hypotheses linking TMT self-care practices to team climate and cohesion, and ultimately to organizational performance. It further argues that TMT cohesion mediates the relationship between self-care and performance, and that stakeholder values toward self-care moderate this dynamic. The paper outlines a mixed-methods research design—combining qualitative interviews with quantitative survey instruments—and identifies validated scales for measuring each variable of interest. Expected outcomes and implications for practitioners and researchers are discussed.
- Introduction: Thesis overview and four research hypotheses
- Theoretical Background: COR Theory and Resource-Based View explained
- Challenges Faced by TMTs: Stress and Eustress: TMT stress, eustress, and individual stress variation
- TMT Self-Care and Team Cohesion: Self-care links to cohesion and performance hypotheses
- Research Design and Measurement: Mixed methods design and validated measurement scales
- Expected Outcomes and Conclusion: Predicted findings and practical implications
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the argument in two well-established theoretical frameworks—COR Theory and the RBV of the firm—giving the hypotheses strong conceptual anchoring.
- Builds a clear logical chain from individual self-care → team cohesion → organizational performance, with each link formalized as a testable hypothesis.
- Identifies validated, named measurement instruments (SCAS, TCI, PS, VSM) for each variable, demonstrating methodological rigor appropriate for a graduate-level proposal.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies hypothesis-driven theoretical development: each section introduces a construct, reviews relevant prior literature, and formalizes the argument as a numbered hypothesis. This structure is characteristic of strong management research proposals and shows students how to move systematically from theory to testable predictions. The mediation (Hypothesis 3) and moderation (Hypothesis 4) hypotheses in particular demonstrate sophistication in specifying boundary conditions and indirect effects.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction that states the thesis and previews all four hypotheses. It then lays out the two theoretical pillars (COR Theory and RBV) before contextualizing the problem through a discussion of TMT stress and eustress. The core argument is developed across sections on TMT self-care, team climate/cohesion, mediation, and stakeholder moderation. A methods section identifies the sample, mixed-methods design, and measurement scales. The paper closes with expected outcomes and a brief conclusion.
Introduction
The concept of self-care carries significance in both individual and organizational contexts. At the individual level, self-care is grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory, which argues that individuals need to engage in activities or accumulate resources that help them maintain their strength and vitality. At the organizational level, the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm suggests that competitive advantage can be gained by accumulating and deploying valuable resources. Top management teams (TMTs) play a critical role in shaping the direction and performance of firms, yet the demands and stresses of these roles can negatively impact the well-being of TMT members, leading to burnout and decreased performance.
Self-care has gained increasing attention as a means to mitigate the adverse effects of stress and promote well-being among individuals. The central argument of this paper is that TMT self-care is a potential resource that can be leveraged as a competitive advantage for organizations. Specifically, it is proposed that TMT self-care can enhance TMT climate and cohesion, which in turn can improve TMT performance. Additionally, it is hypothesized that TMT cohesion/climate will mediate the relationship between TMT self-care and performance, and that the moderating effect of stakeholder self-care values on this relationship will be significant.
Theoretical Background
Conservation of Resources Theory
COR Theory is a psychological framework proposing that individuals are motivated to protect and build their resources in order to maintain their well-being and reduce stress. In this theory, resources refer to any object, personal characteristic, condition, or energy that an individual values and could potentially lose (Halbesleben et al., 2014). Individuals strive to protect existing resources and acquire new ones because resource loss can lead to negative emotions, stress, and burnout, all of which undermine performance and well-being. Accordingly, individuals benefit from engaging in activities that replenish their strength and vitality—such as seeking social support, preserving autonomy, cultivating positive emotions, and exercising regularly.
Self-care practices are considered one way of protecting and building personal resources (Lee & Miller, 2013). Self-care refers to any deliberate activity that an individual undertakes to improve their physical, mental, or emotional well-being. Examples include exercise, meditation, sleep hygiene, healthy eating, and hobbies. By engaging in these practices, individuals can replenish personal resources, reduce stress, and sustain their well-being over time.
Resource-Based View of the Firm
The RBV of the firm is a management theory that emphasizes the importance of a firm's internal resources and capabilities in determining its competitive advantage and long-term success. A firm's resources may be tangible or intangible and can include physical assets, intellectual property, human resources, and organizational culture, among others. The RBV argues that competitive advantage is determined by a firm's unique set of resources and capabilities that are difficult for competitors to imitate or replicate, thereby enabling sustained profitability over time.
The RBV also stresses that resources and capabilities are interdependent and should be managed holistically. A firm's resources must be aligned with its strategic goals, and the firm should continuously invest in developing those resources to maintain its advantage. According to Barney (1991), firms can achieve sustainable competitive advantage by possessing and leveraging unique and valuable resources that are difficult to imitate or substitute (p. 100). Amit and Schoemaker (1993) extend this framework, arguing that a firm's resources generate "organizational rent" when used to create value for stakeholders (p. 34). Wernerfelt (1984) similarly contends that a firm's resources constitute a "bundle" unique to the firm and resistant to competitive replication (p. 172).
Applied to the present study, the resource-based view provides a lens for analyzing self-care as a strategic asset. The self-care practices of TMT members may be viewed as a valuable and difficult-to-imitate resource that enhances the firm's capacity to manage stress and improve decision-making, ultimately contributing to better organizational performance.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.