This essay examines the major arguments presented by both proponents and opponents of stricter gun control legislation in the United States. Pro-gun control advocates argue that tougher laws prevent violent crimes, protect children, and background checks keep firearms from dangerous individuals. Anti-gun control advocates counter that gun ownership is a constitutional right, that armed citizens deter crime, and that banning firearms does not prevent criminals from obtaining guns. The paper presents factual support for each position, including statistics on mass shootings, child fatalities, background check denials, and concealed carry permits.
The debate over gun control is a discussion that brings out the passion in people, whether they are for or against stricter gun control measures. Pro-gun control individuals argue that tougher gun laws will prevent violent crimes, that more stringent regulations will protect children, and that enforcing background checks will keep firearms out of the hands of individuals who should not have them. Individuals who oppose stricter gun control argue that protecting oneself is a fundamental right, that violent crimes will decrease when more people carry guns legally, and that banning guns does not deter crime.
Supporters of tougher gun control laws argue that stricter regulations will prevent violent crimes, particularly mass shootings that occur throughout the country. Over the past thirty years, there have been approximately seventy mass shootings in the United States. Every time a mass shooting occurs, the gun debate rises to the forefront of public discourse. However, research shows that around three-quarters of the guns used in these mass shootings were purchased legally, raising questions about the effectiveness of current screening processes.
Those who argue that tougher gun control will protect children point to alarming statistics about youth firearm deaths. According to advocates, "guns in America are creating a public health crisis that is attacking children." Eight American children are killed every day in America, a statistic frequently cited by gun control supporters as evidence of an urgent public health emergency.
Gun control advocates also argue that background checks will prevent firearms from reaching individuals who should not possess them. Supporters point to data showing that the number of criminals, domestic abusers, and individuals with mental health concerns who have been denied gun purchases is nearly two million, demonstrating the effectiveness of existing screening mechanisms.
Those who oppose stricter gun control cite the Constitution of the United States. The Second Amendment states that it is every American's inherent right to own and maintain a firearm. This fundamental right allows individuals to protect themselves from people who wish to do them harm. Currently, there are over eleven million concealed carry permit holders in the United States, with each state governing its own concealed carry laws.
Another argument from individuals who oppose stricter gun control concerns violent crime rates. They argue that violent crime decreases when more people carry guns legally. If a criminal knows that someone is carrying a firearm, they are less likely to commit a violent crime against that individual. Over the past fifteen years, laws referring to the right to carry have been liberalized in many states. In that same timeframe, violent crime rates have decreased, according to anti-gun control advocates.
Gun rights advocates also contend that banning all firearms will not deter crimes. They argue that criminals will still obtain guns through illegal channels, and that prohibition would only cause the black market for firearms to flourish rather than reduce overall criminal access to weapons.
Whether you are for or against more gun control laws, the debate brings out the passion in people. Both sides present evidence and reasoning to support their positions, making this one of the most contentious policy debates in contemporary American politics.
You’re 93% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.