Ideology and Revolt in Mary E. Wilkins Freeman's Story
This paper analyzes Mary E. Wilkins Freeman's short story "The Revolt of Mother," focusing on the ideology of the protagonist, Sarah Penn, and how her steadfast philosophy drives the story's central conflict and resolution. The paper examines Sarah's character development, her role as catalyst, the use of point of view, the New England setting, and the story's broader themes of marital communication and self-determination. It also considers Freeman's own later rejection of the story and what that ambivalence reveals about attitudes toward strong women. The paper argues that Sarah's evolving ideology — her unwavering dream of a proper home — is the true "magic" that enables her revolt and ultimate triumph over forty years of silent endurance.
- Introduction: A Woman Who Knows What She Wants: Overview of story's themes and Sarah's ideology
- Sarah Penn: Character, Determination, and Forty Years of Resentment: Sarah's role, resentments, and confrontation with Adoniram
- Ideology as the 'Magic' Force in the Story: How Sarah's ideology drives her revolt and character arc
- Point of View, Setting, and Yankee Ingenuity: Narrative focus, New England setting, and Sarah's adaptability
- Freeman's Ambivalence Toward Her Own Story: Freeman's later rejection and what it reveals
- Conclusion: Communication, Ideology, and Underlying Sadness: Tragic silence between spouses and story's lasting truth
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper anchors its literary analysis in a clearly defined critical concept — ideology — and traces how that concept operates through character, plot, and setting, giving the essay coherent focus throughout.
- Direct quotations from the primary text are woven into the argument at each stage, grounding claims in textual evidence rather than assertion alone.
- The inclusion of Freeman's own later repudiation of the story adds an interesting meta-critical layer, inviting the reader to question authorial intent versus textual meaning.
- The paper balances close reading with thematic synthesis, moving from specific scenes (moving into the barn, the brother's letter) to broader conclusions about marriage and communication.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates ideological literary criticism — using a defined philosophical concept (ideology as the principles one lives by) as a lens through which to read character motivation and narrative structure. This approach shows how a single critical framework can unify character analysis, plot analysis, and thematic discussion into a coherent argument.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a thesis introducing "ideology" as its central lens, then moves through a plot-level character study of Sarah Penn, an analysis of how her ideology creates narrative momentum, a discussion of point of view and setting, a biographical note on Freeman's rejection of the story, and a conclusion that ties the theme of non-communication back to the paper's central claim. Each section builds on the previous one without redundancy.
Introduction: A Woman Who Knows What She Wants
Mary E. Wilkins Freeman's short story "The Revolt of Mother" centers on the concept of ideology and demonstrates how its "magic" operates through one determined woman's choices. The story is an amusing account of a woman who knows what she wants, has done without it for forty years, and is no longer willing to endure the deprivation. Sarah Penn is a strong character who stands up to her husband and refuses to allow him to continue dominating the family. She uses her tough ideology to create the situation she desires, illustrating not only the need for understanding and communication in a relationship, but also the necessity of standing up for oneself, no matter the cost.
References
Foster, Edward. Mary E. Wilkins Freeman. New York: Hendricks House, 1956.
Freeman, Mary E. Wilkins. "The Revolt of Mother." Personal Web Page. 2000. 13 March 2003.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.