This review examines David Wallace Adams' Education for Extinction: American Indians and the Boarding School Experience, 1875–1928, which documents the U.S. government's use of off-reservation boarding schools to forcibly assimilate Native American children. Adams argues that these institutions functioned as tools of cultural conquest rather than genuine education, employing military discipline, language suppression, and ideological indoctrination to eradicate Native identity. The review considers how the schools reflected broader tensions in American education—balancing opportunity with cultural erasure—while exploring the paradoxical responses of both white reformers and Native families who sometimes viewed these schools as alternatives to poverty and dispossession.
Education in America is often assumed to be an unquestioned source of good for all citizens. However, the question of how to educate the young and who has the right to do so raises troubling questions of acculturation, particularly regarding Native Americans. David Wallace Adams' book Education for Extinction: American Indians and the Boarding School Experience, 1875–1928 chronicles the forced assimilation efforts engineered by the American government to transform Native Americans into "real" Americans. From the mid-19th to the late 20th century, the American government and private organizations colluded to "civilize" Native Americans through the creation of off-reservation boarding schools.
Although the term "boarding schools" sounds benign or even elite, these institutions functioned more like re-education facilities or prison camps. The first school was established on a military post in Pennsylvania and headed by Captain Richard H. Pratt, whose leadership revealed the true purpose of these camps: moral conquest rather than genuine education. They attempted to eradicate Native culture as systematically as the American government had stripped Native peoples of their tribal lands. Pratt himself did not view his project as destructive. In an era when the phrase "only good Indian is a dead Indian" circulated widely, Pratt saw himself as saving the next generation by destroying "the Indian within the soul" of Native children—a vision he deemed progressive. Native children were taken from their families, had their hair cut, were forced to wear Western clothes and eat Western food, and were required to adopt Christian names like Jacob and Rachel, much like enslaved Africans forced to abandon their original identities (Adams 52–54).
To accomplish their goal of cultural eradication, the boarding schools operated without allowance for dissent. They taught the values of democracy and patriotism while remaining autocratic by design. The parallel between military conquest of Native lands and the colonization of Native children is striking: just as horses, guns, missionaries, and wagons had been used to dispossess Native peoples, schools became the final weapon in the government's colonization effort (Adams 5).
Indian children were taught that their ancestral ways and their parents' traditions were wrong. Rather than fostering solidarity with peers, they were instructed to inform on schoolfellows who disobeyed—for instance, those who spoke their native languages in private. This surveillance was framed as being "for the children's own good," justified by the rhetoric that the only alternatives were to "butcher or to civilize" the Indian (Adams 2).
The boarding school regime employed corporal punishment, military-style marching and drills, and athletic competitions structured differently by gender: boys played football, while girls were groomed to adopt Victorian norms of cloistered womanhood. Yet education was not equal. Native children were assumed to be intellectually inferior and taught to labor in service to whites. Although these children were native to America's shores, they were treated as aliens. Those who attempted to escape were tracked down, but unlike slave-owners, the enforcers claimed to act for the children's benefit rather than personal gain—though the system conveniently served the American government's goals, even if hidden from some devoutly Christian teachers.
Adams makes considerable effort to recover the voices of these children, providing firsthand accounts: "By evening I was too tired to play and just fell asleep wherever I sat down. I think this is why the boys and girls ran away from school; why some became ill; why it was so hard to learn. We were too tired to study" (Adams 153). Children were kept perpetually busy in accordance with the Protestant work ethic; hard labor was thought to suppress dissent, questioning, and forbidden practices such as observing Indian rituals or traditions.
The boarding school experience was a spatial and intellectual project. Children were separated from their families and taught American values of individual property ownership—a cruel irony given that their own tribal lands had been confiscated. They were instructed that America was the land of the free, yet their parents had been denied the freedom to educate their own children. Their bodies and minds were colonized with foreign ideology; they were trained to work for their oppressors rather than learn their peoples' traditions of hunting, fishing, and living on the land. Every hour was dominated by the European clock and orders from teachers; rules could not be questioned.
The educational experience also reflected broader patterns in American history. The schools used the same tools of cultural imposition applied to immigrant and African American populations—midweek prayers, McGuffey readers, industrial training, and domestic science—to teach that American culture was inherently superior. Native children internalized the message that to maintain ancient traditions was incompatible with being a "true" American (Adams 335).
"Historical schooling practices and Native family survival strategies"
"Boarding schools as part of broader American cultural homogenization"
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.