This essay examines intercultural communication and sensitivity in middle and high school classrooms, drawing on more than ten years of secondary teaching and administrative experience. The author explores how cultural background shapes students' verbal and nonverbal communication styles, why uncertainty and anxiety arise in diverse classrooms, and what principles should guide multicultural education in the United States. The paper integrates scholarship from Neulip, Gay, and Gorski and Covert to argue that cultivating intercultural competence during adolescence is essential for students' academic achievement, personal development, and preparation for participation in a democratic, pluralistic society.
The paper uses first-person reflective analysis integrated with citation-supported claims — a technique common in practitioner-scholar writing. Rather than separating personal anecdote from evidence, the author weaves them together, allowing each cited claim to be immediately tested against observed classroom experience. This makes the argument more persuasive than either pure memoir or pure literature review would be alone.
The essay opens with a definition of intercultural communication and a statement of the author's teaching context. It then moves through theoretical foundations (culture, communication, perception) before pivoting to pedagogical principles drawn from multicultural education scholarship. A supplemental section presents four discrete classroom experiences in a brief experience/knowledge format. The essay closes with six numbered conclusions synthesizing the argument.
This essay addresses the significance of intercultural sensitivity in secondary education, with particular emphasis on teaching mixed cultures. Having taught secondary education in a private school setting for more than ten years, I have learned a great deal about working with children in a multicultural setting, which this essay will explore.
Intercultural communication and associated intercultural sensitivity — whether taught in a middle or high school — may be defined as the ability to communicate with individuals of varying backgrounds, ethnicities, beliefs, morals, and cultures in a manner that is meaningful and encourages knowledge sharing (Neulip, 2003).
Within the United States over the last decade, more and more children of different cultural backgrounds, traditions, communication styles, and belief systems have been brought together in the classroom setting. The chances for intercultural communication are highest in the middle and high school years, where children are just beginning to form a sense of identity and relate with one another. My teaching experience has taught me that it is increasingly important that intercultural communication be supported and taught within the classroom environment during these critical years, when children are starting to form opinions of themselves and others.
Why is intercultural sensitivity important? Depending on the culture in which a student is raised, their method of communication and understanding — both verbal and nonverbal — will differ. Children must learn to be sensitive to the different verbal and nonverbal cues given by others from varying cultural backgrounds, so that they do not jump to conclusions about the meanings of such signals.
As an experienced teacher working with students of many different cultures, I have found that the challenges of intercultural communication include fostering an environment that is supportive and understanding despite complex differences in communication styles. I have also learned that by creating an environment that supports intercultural communication, one builds a healthier educational environment and reduces conflict in the classroom — particularly with middle and high school students, who are more prone to outbursts.
It has also become apparent that the initial lack of understanding resulting from intercultural communication differences presents a barrier that must be broken before effective communication can occur (Neulip, 2003). This is the primary responsibility of the teacher: to help foster communication understanding and sensitivity. Frustration and confusion among students of varying ethnicities trying to communicate are additional challenges a teacher must be willing to face, as different linguistic groups and traditions are brought into one environment and attempt to learn together (Neulip, 2003).
There are numerous international and domestic intercultural contacts present, particularly in the middle and high school setting. Students are exposed to children from a wide variety of backgrounds as well as educators with varying belief systems.
Communication in and of itself is difficult to define; however, several principles associated with communication are universal. As a teacher, I have reviewed numerous definitions of communication and particularly intercultural communication. These definitions suggest that communication is, first, a process — one that is ongoing and consistently changing. It is dynamic, meaning active. Communication is also interactive and thus occurs between people, requiring active participation of at minimum two individuals sending and receiving messages. Communication is symbolic, meaning it serves as a vehicle through which the thoughts and ideas of one person are conveyed to another. Finally, it is intentional, meaning it is a process centered around purpose (Neulip, 2003).
Through my work with students, I have learned that culture is an accumulated pattern of values, beliefs, and behaviors usually defined by an individual's value and belief systems (Neulip, 2003). Other educators have affirmed that the function of culture is to influence an individual's physical and perceptual environment and provide a framework for interpreting the world we live in (Neulip, 2003). Culture is characterized by an identifiable group of people who share a common history, including similar values, beliefs, and behaviors (Neulip, 2003).
As an experienced administrator, I have witnessed the effects of verbal and nonverbal interaction in the classroom. The primary forms of intercultural communication include verbal and nonverbal symbol systems, which members of a culture use to communicate meaning (Neulip, 2003). Educational research suggests that two cultures can share a common verbal code but utilize different styles of verbal communication; generally, nonverbal communication forms vary significantly from culture to culture (Neulip, 2003).
Watching and interacting with students at the middle and high school level has taught me that intercultural communication can occur within many different contexts and result in different influences on perceptual processes. Studies suggest that the primary or native culture of any individual will influence every aspect of their communicative exchange and their resulting perceptions of the world. Individuals also perceive things from a micro-cultural context — that is, through the subcultures they are exposed to on a daily basis (Neulip, 2003). I have observed this in watching families and students interact, where familial behaviors are often reproduced in the classroom.
The primary cultural influences on perception include differences in ethnicity, race, and language (Neulip, 2003). Cultural influences may also relate to the environmental context in which individuals are raised, or the physical geography where they grow up, which may prescribe certain rules for communication and affect an individual's perception (Neulip, 2003). The perceptual context with regard to culture encompasses the individual components of cultural interaction, including a person's "cognitions, attitudes, dispositions, and motivations" regarding the way they share information and communicate with one another (Neulip, 2003).
You’re 40% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.