This paper examines the concept of entrepreneurship through the lens of Peter Drucker's innovation framework, tracing the origins of the entrepreneurial mindset and its relationship to strategic decision-making. The paper applies Drucker's four sources of innovation — the unexpected, incongruities, process needs, and industry and market structure — to the emerging field of predictive technology. Through this analysis, the paper demonstrates how predictive technologies in vehicles, travel, computing, genetics, and consumer households represent a timely convergence of entrepreneurial spirit, declining costs, and expanding computing power, and argues that these technologies are poised to reshape consumer expectations within the near future.
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis: taking an established academic model (Drucker's entrepreneurship paradigm) and systematically mapping it onto a real-world phenomenon. This technique shows analytical competence by testing whether the theory predicts or explains observed behavior, rather than simply describing the theory or the phenomenon in isolation.
The paper opens by defining entrepreneurship conceptually and introducing Drucker's decision-making theory. It then identifies predictive technology as a case study and applies Drucker's four innovation sources to it in a structured table. Following this, it broadens the discussion to nascent entrepreneurship and global economic development, then closes with five concrete examples of predictive technology in daily life and a forward-looking conclusion. The structure mirrors a classic theory-application-implication pattern common in business and management essays.
The word entrepreneurship has its origins in the French verb entreprendre, meaning "to undertake." In one sense, every business idea starts with a core philosophy of entrepreneurialism, usually expressing itself through innovation and a willingness to risk in order to turn ideas into economic gain. This spirit manifests itself either through novel ideas, small businesses, or a broader mind-set. Entrepreneurship is an attitude more than anything else — it is the difference between leading and managing, between quitting when barriers arise and persevering through them. Entrepreneurial culture is part of the core of Western expansion into the new world, and requires distinguishing between motivation and opportunity. The very nature of economic growth opportunities depends on national institutions in conjunction with economic conditions, while motivations are determined by preferences and the entire risk-reward calculation (Foreman-Peck & Zhou, 2010).
Management scholar Peter Drucker believes that appropriate decision-making is perhaps the fundamental key to success or failure within a modern organization. He notes that "the skill we need is not long-range planning. It is strategic decision making or perhaps strategic planning" (Drucker, 2001, p. 116). Combining this idea of decision-making at the highest level with innovation captures the crux of the modern organization. For a modern organization to survive, strategic and innovation decisions must be made in almost every aspect of the business. Decision-making success is now measured in minutes rather than days, and requires managers to be better informed and more willing to act.
In terms of innovation, Drucker identifies seven classes of sources of innovation in the entrepreneurial spirit. These include: 1) the unexpected — new developments or unforeseen outcomes; 2) incongruities — conflicts between opposing functions; 3) process needs — changes in culture or society that require innovation; and 4) industry and market structure — the merging of industries, blending of sectors, and acceleration of new product growth as spin-offs (Drucker, 2007).
Taking those four sources and extrapolating them into the modern world, we can see that entrepreneurship is moving through job creation and integration that allows forward purpose and progression. The activity may result in new organizations, revitalize older ones, or respond to opportunities that did not previously exist due to limitations in technology or geography. Entrepreneurship is therefore not simply a business activity, but a multidimensional source of inspiration that moves across various business structures, psychological characteristics, engineering and re-engineering, the social sciences, and education (Audretsch, 2007).
One compelling example of this is the rise of predictive technology. This field is built on the fact that computer chips have become increasingly powerful, resulting in greater computing power at lower cost — meaning broader consumer access. Predictive technology can be applied in remarkably innovative ways: developing navigation systems that predict routes based on traffic or time of day, estimating how much paper or ink a printer will use, regulating home heating and cooling based on weather data, or even enabling a refrigerator to generate a grocery list based on consumption trends (Brandon, 2012).
Companies and products already on the market use predictive technology in an entrepreneurial fashion. For instance, Applied Predictive Technologies produces business analytics software that "reduces the risk of any new initiative by systematically testing the idea with a subset of stores, customers, or employees," using complex algorithms to test multiple processes and scenarios for viability (APT Technologies, 2013). This approach is essentially a collection of "what if" scenarios that takes consumer and business data and predicts likely outcomes based on demographics, psychographics, fiscal analysis, and operations. The power of this technology lies in its low cost relative to traditional market research, and the ability for clients to run, in theory, an unlimited number of scenarios.
Using Drucker's paradigm, we can analyze predictive technology in a way that demonstrates how it is innovative, timely, and entrepreneurial across each of his four categories (Swaim, 2011):
Computer technology has improved dramatically over time. When we consider that the average smartphone now contains more computing power than all of NASA's systems during the first Apollo missions, the scale of access becomes clear. Moore's Law holds that the industry changes drastically every 18 months — a cycle of both unexpected and planned developments. This progression allows predictive technologies to be incorporated into a widening range of products: coffee makers, smart home systems (lighting, music, and heating that activate when you are almost home), transportation, and more.
Drucker's concept of incongruity involves seeing the gap between what is and "what ought to be." Predictions about life in the early 2010s were in some ways technologically superior to reality, yet in other respects fell short of expectations. For predictive technology, the incongruity may also be driven by the economics of depleting existing inventory before introducing newer models. For instance, if a manufacturer produces one million chips, it is unlikely to introduce too many new models until those units are sold. As a result, while predictive technologies are slowly becoming available, an incongruity remains between their development and their availability to market. Manufacturers generally prefer to sell current models before discounting them to make way for new predictive-technology-enabled products.
Innovation based on process needs implies that something is missing in the current process or technology. From a manufacturing point of view, process needs center on return on investment. If the cost to add predictive technology in 2010 is X, but 30% lower in 2012 with a higher quality rate, many manufacturers will wait until there is a genuine benefit — both fiscal and competitive — before adapting their systems. Adding predictive technologies to products would also require additional employee training, expanded customer service capacity, and consideration of warranty issues.
Changes in industry structure are often the result of consumer pressure. Given the rapid half-life of technology, consumers increasingly expect more from electronic appliances. Adding a "smart chip" to a product raises consumer expectations across the board — prompting the question: "Why aren't more appliances and devices predictive?" At the same time, cost sensitivity varies by product category. A consumer might pay 10–20% more for a predictive GPS, but may be unwilling to pay hundreds of dollars more for a predictive heating or cooling system. The cost-benefit ratio is both industry- and market-dependent; advertising and market familiarity can shift the consumer's perspective — up to a point.
Predictive technology is no longer a "nice to have" or a theoretical "what if." It is a matter of integrating smart computing chips into applications that carry real meaning for individuals and organizations alike. It is entrepreneurial in spirit, innovative in concept, and market-driven. Predictive technology will likely change the way many products operate and reshape consumer expectations substantially within the next several years.
APT Technologies. (2013, January). About. Retrieved February 2013, from APT - Test and Learn:
Audretsch, D. (2007). The Entrepreneurial Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brandon, J. (2012, March 29). 6 Major Tech Innovations for 2012. Retrieved February 2013, from Inc. Magazine:
Drucker, P. (2001). Harvard Business Review on Decision Making. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Drucker, P. (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Foreman-Peck, J., & Zhou, P. (2010, August). The Strength and Persistence of Entrepreneurial Cultures. Retrieved from Cardiff Business School:
Soriano, D., et al. (2010). Nascent Entrepreneurship and Context. [Referenced in text]
Swaim, R. (2011). The Strategic Drucker. [Referenced in text]
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.