This paper explores the dynamics of international lending and capital flows, focusing on their role in triggering and perpetuating financial crises. It traces the growth of cross-border capital movements among industrialized nations and their expansion to developing countries, explaining how factors such as over-lending, exchange rate risk, exogenous shocks, large short-term debts, and financial contagion contribute to recurring crises. The paper examines the 1997 Asian financial crisis as a central case study and discusses the role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in responding to crises through rescue packages and debt restructuring. Both the benefits and criticisms of these resolution strategies are addressed.
There has been remarkable growth in the gross and net external positions and international capital flows over the last two decades. This represents growth of nearly three times among industrialized or developed countries and has produced large effects on asset price valuations; exchange rates have also changed considerably as these countries have acquired larger external assets and liabilities. This increase in international capital flows has led to heightened interest in understanding the concepts and forces that drive capital flows and their effects on the economy, especially at the macro level. Most of what is known about international capital flows relates to risk-free bond trading only. By presenting an analysis of the empirical reasons for international financial crises and the role of the International Monetary Fund, and drawing on what is known about international capital flows, it is possible to understand why these crises are recurrent.
International trade carries significant financial implications in the form of international capital flows. In most international trade deals, the net trade balance—the difference between the amount paid out in international transactions and that received from international transactions—is almost never zero. This creates a current capital account balance from the net financial flow, which can represent either an asset or a liability for the country. When the trade balance shows a surplus, the country holds an asset in the sense that it can offset future transactions using this balance. When it shows a deficit, the country carries a liability that it can offset through strategies such as currency variations or the issuance of securities. Snoy (1989) states that the bulk of international capital flows are for transactions occurring between industrialized or developed nations, particularly the wealthiest ones.
International capital flows can help a country support long-term income growth through better allocation of savings and investment. On the other hand, they can also make macroeconomic management more difficult, as seen in the challenges facing developing countries and other emerging economies. These less economically robust economies must bear the effects of abrupt capital inflow reversals, faster international transmission of shocks, asset price boom-bust cycles, and increased credit risk.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an international organization formed in 1944 at the Bretton Woods Conference. It had 29 member states at the time of its formal initiation in 1945. The purpose of the IMF is to promote global stability of currencies and exchange rates, to facilitate the expansion and growth of international trade, and to assist in establishing multilateral payment systems for transactions. To fulfill its purpose, the IMF provides financing and policy advice to its members, who contribute funds through a quota system into a common pool. The IMF has provided advice and loans to countries experiencing economic crises in order to aid balance-of-payments adjustment. The IMF was particularly instrumental during the Second World War era and the Great Depression.
Industrialized countries generally exhibit well-behaved patterns of international lending and borrowing. This is because they share similar macroeconomic characteristics and are able to grow their wealth considerably. Without international borrowing, these countries would be limited to domestic investment opportunities, which would create a negative balance-of-payments position. Without international lending, countries whose domestic investment opportunities are limited would earn only modest returns on their investments and experience low interest rates (Cecco, 1974). Industrialized countries therefore gain from both international lending and borrowing, though the benefit to each country depends on whether it is acting as lender or borrower.
"History of lending shifts toward developing countries"
"Five causes: over-lending, shocks, exchange rate risk, debt, contagion"
"IMF rescue packages and debt restructuring strategies"
Lone Christiansen, Alessandro Prati, Luca Antonio Ricci, & Thierry Tressel. (2009). External balance in low-income countries. NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics, 6(1), 265–322.
Snoy, B. (1989). Ethical issues in international lending. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(8), 635–639.
Taylor, J. B. (2011). Macroeconomic lessons from the Great Deviation. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 25(1), 387–395.
You’re 29% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.