This paper examines how a graduate-level Master of Science in Quality Assurance (MSQA) program can achieve continual improvement through three interconnected frameworks: ISO 9001:2008 standards, quality plan auditing, and Corrective Action Preventative Action (CAPA) programs. Drawing on Milton Krivokuca's presentation "Quality and Effectiveness Assessment in Higher Education," the paper argues that quality plan auditing holds the greatest potential for improving both service delivery and knowledge acquisition. It highlights the value of attitudinal measures, longitudinal career data, and instructor performance metrics as components of a comprehensive 360-degree quality feedback system aligned with evolving industry standards.
The paper demonstrates comparative prioritization — it introduces three related frameworks, describes each in relation to the same goal, and then argues for the superiority of one. This technique is effective in applied fields where multiple valid approaches exist and practitioners must justify resource allocation. The argument is strengthened by listing multiple distinct functions of quality plan auditing (empirical data, attitudinal data, longitudinal career tracking, instructor evaluation), which cumulatively build the case.
The paper opens with a thesis establishing all three frameworks as necessary for a graduate program's quality system. The second paragraph introduces the Krivokuca presentation as the primary analytical lens, explaining its unique methodological contributions. The third paragraph pivots to the central argument — that quality plan auditing is the most impactful of the three — and enumerates its specific advantages. The conclusion metaphorically frames quality plan auditing as providing "360-degree feedback," reinforcing its comprehensive scope.
Creating a solid foundation for the continual improvement of a quality assurance program requires taking into account the customer-centric aspects of ISO 9001:2008, balancing them with greater precision in quality objectives and measurement. Because a graduate-level program is longitudinal in scope and encompasses many different experiences, the use of quality plan auditing and continual Corrective Action Preventative Action (CAPA) programs is essential. Only by incorporating the foundational elements of ISO 9001:2008, quality plan auditing, and CAPA can a graduate-level program stay aligned with quality requirements while remaining agile enough to evolve alongside quality standards over time.
Triangulating a graduate-level curriculum to the dual objectives of fidelity to ISO standards and agility in meeting industry requirements is exemplified in the presentation given by Milton Krivokuca, DBA, titled Quality and Effectiveness Assessment in Higher Education. The foundational elements of the presentation — including its referential use of ISO 9001:2008 principles and its extensive application of quality plan auditing — illustrate a methodology that can keep a graduate-level program aligned with quality objectives and ISO standards.
What is unique about the presentation is its use of attitudinal-based measures for CAPA analysis and as an element of quality plan auditing. Taken together, these foundational elements create a stable framework that can be used to apply CAPA-based improvements to a course while simultaneously allowing quality objectives to be adjusted based on students' program performance over time. The presentation also provides a series of benchmarks that can be used to create customized metrics of quality performance by learning program, down to the course level.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.