This paper examines the artistic significance of Jackson Pollock's work, tracing his development from early surrealism and Regionalism to his pioneering role in Abstract Expressionism. The paper analyzes Pollock's unconventional painting methodology — including his use of drip techniques, floor-spread canvases, and improvised tools — and explains how these methods allowed him to express both conscious and unconscious thought. It also addresses the scholarly recognition of mathematical properties within his drip paintings and his invention of the "all-over" compositional style, arguing that Pollock's lasting importance lies in his radical expansion of what painting could express and how it could be made.
Since Jackson Pollock painted in a number of different styles and genres during his lifetime, identifying his aims and goals is no simple task. During his career, which began in earnest in the 1930s and spanned until his death in 1956, Pollock produced works indicative of cubism, surrealism, and abstract expressionism. However, it was his innovations in the Abstract Expressionist mode of painting that enabled him to garner the most fame, and for which his name and works are still acclaimed today. It would therefore be accurate to state that the overall significance of Pollock's work lies in his ability to use painting to express — in approaches that were novel at the time — virtually everything about a painter, including his conscious and unconscious mind.
It is important to acknowledge the evolution of Pollock's work, which began when he took up painting at the Art Students League in the late 1920s. In his early years he was involved with various aspects of surrealism and Regionalism, which led him to produce works in which his aim was to portray reality not as it was, but as the painter himself conceived of it. Pollock's eventual progression to Abstract Expressionism was merely a continuation of this trend. This genre of painting — of which he is the initial purveyor and unquestionable innovator — grants the artist uninhibited freedom to express ideas that may have no basis in observable reality, or do so in a way that is not immediately discernible to the viewer. Pollock's abstract art allowed him to convey thoughts and sentiments that might not have had any basis in reality, or that at least resisted straightforward pictorial representation.
In order to appreciate the significance of such works, it is crucial to understand the methodology Pollock employed in creating them. His methods labeled him a maverick in the world of painting. He readily abandoned conventional tools such as easels and, on more than one occasion, even paintbrushes. Instead, he would spread his canvases on the floor and employ a variety of techniques to apply paint — pouring it, dripping it, or using improvised tools such as knives or sticks. He would also use these unconventional tools to manipulate the paint once it was on the canvas, moving it around with everyday objects such as pieces of glass or even sand.
This approach placed Pollock squarely within what critics would come to call action painting, a term that captures the physical and gestural energy he brought to the canvas. Rather than standing before an easel in the traditional manner, Pollock immersed himself in the act of painting, treating the canvas as an arena for movement and expression.
"Action painting conveyed motion and unconscious expression"
"Mathematical patterns and all-over composition cement legacy"
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.