This essay examines the convergence of high art and popular culture in the twentieth century, tracing how the Abstract Expressionist movement and subsequent Pop Art revolution transformed artistic practice and institutional aesthetics. Through detailed analysis of Jackson Pollock's media celebrity, Andy Warhol's commercial imagery, Roy Lichtenstein's mechanical reproduction techniques, and Barbara Kruger's agitprop activism, the paper demonstrates how artists deliberately appropriated popular culture—not merely popular subjects—to challenge Romantic notions of artistic authenticity and self-expression. The essay argues that Pop Art fundamentally redefined what constitutes appropriate artistic subject matter and tone, liberating art from museum confinement and positioning the artist as cultural commentator rather than solitary genius.
The world of art has experienced two distinct trends in recent decades since the mid-twentieth century. On one hand, high art has become less central to most people's lives. More visceral forms of popular media—including photography, film, and television—have claimed public attention. Visual representations such as sketching and painting are no longer relied upon to commemorate historical and personal occasions. As a result of the divide between popular and high culture and the increasing significance of pop culture, high art has begun to adopt many themes and even the visual style of popular works to justify its existence. As pop culture becomes part of every person's framework of reference, the elements of pop art have been co-opted and reconfigured by many great artists.
The cross-pollination between high and popular culture began when Abstract Expressionist Jackson Pollock became famous as a result of a Life magazine article on his works. The Life action shots showing Pollock in the act of painting made a formerly obscure style of art—which to the untrained eye looked like splatter paintings—seem more meaningful. Life was a photojournalist magazine, but it had the power to make a traditional art form like painting accessible and relevant in a popular fashion. As one source noted, "As the single most recognizable practitioner of Abstract Expressionism—the movement that put America and, specifically, post-World War II New York at the epicenter of painting's avant-garde—Pollock was a genuine art star" ("Jackson Pollock," Time).
Pollock's star soon fell as he drifted into depression and drugs. However, the Life magazine article set the tone for how art and the popular press would enter into dialogue in the twentieth century. High art could no longer afford to ignore popular art, given its ubiquity.
The next major movement in America after Pollock was Pop Art, a deliberate reaction to the obscurity of Abstract Expressionism. In contrast to the abstraction popular during the early twentieth century, Pop Art had a very literal appearance, drawing from the stylistic vocabulary of advertising, cartoons, and other popular media. It superficially looked like something in a simplistic and representational fashion, although it arguably critiqued and ironized what it portrayed despite its shallow surface. As one art historian explains, "It could be argued that the Abstract Expressionists searched for trauma in the soul, while Pop artists searched for traces of the same trauma in the mediated world of advertising, cartoons, and popular imagery at large" ("Pop Art," The Art Story).
Pop Art collapsed the division between high and popular art to such a degree that it was often difficult to distinguish what was high and what was popular when the inspiration and the art were paired side-by-side. Andy Warhol's famous silk-screened Campbell's soup cans, for example, were deliberately designed to look somewhat rough and amateurish, just like an advertisement for the product, rather than presenting a more perfect vision of the infamous red-and-white graphic.
Pop Art also differed in attitude as well as aesthetic from Abstract Expressionism. Pop Art overall had a more playful texture than Abstract Expressionism. Its representational rather than abstract and obscure style had an observational, intellectual self-referential quality, as opposed to the sense that it was opening up a window onto the artist's individual soul in a Romantic sense. As scholars note, "Although Pop art encompasses a wide variety of work with very different attitudes and postures, much of it is somewhat emotionally removed. In contrast to the 'hot' expression of the gestural abstraction that preceded it, Pop art is generally 'coolly' ambivalent. Whether this suggests an acceptance of the popular world or a shocked withdrawal has been the subject of much debate" ("Pop Art," The Art Story).
There was little of the actual artist in the work; much like in Warhol's famous studies of Campbell's soup cans, the focus was on creating a dispassionate tone that drained the image of any potential invested higher meaning. The repetition of the cans and their sameness suggested there was no meaning, emotion, or individuality in the face of such branding of experience.
An excellent example of this transposition of popular art into high art can be seen in the works of Roy Lichtenstein. Lichtenstein made use of a technique that deliberately gave his paintings the texture of the popular, pulpy sensational magazines and cartoons of his era. "Lichtenstein's emphasis on methods of mechanical reproduction—particularly through his signature use of Ben-Day dots—highlighted one of the central lessons of Pop art, that all forms of communication, all messages, are filtered through codes or languages" ("Roy Lichtenstein," The Art Story).
Lichtenstein said he used cartoons ironically and wished to show "that high art and popular art were no different: both rely on code" ("Roy Lichtenstein," The Art Story). Lichtenstein's understanding of code as a kind of specific vocabulary or shorthand was counter to the notion of art as something self-expressive and transcendent. He explained: "I'm never drawing the object itself; I'm only drawing a depiction of the object—a kind of crystallized symbol of it" ("Roy Lichtenstein," The Art Story).
In fact, it could be argued that all of Lichtenstein's work is twice removed from its original source. In a portrait of a drowning woman, for example, he was inspired by an actual panel from a teen romantic magazine, which he then translated into art. The viewer feels no sense of loss or feeling for the woman, given that it was based upon a false, sensationalistic reproduction that is then even further removed from its original source by being taken out of context and translated onto a canvas as art ("Roy Lichtenstein," The Art Story).
Another good example of Lichtenstein's work is his famous Popeye (1961), which is a direct reproduction of a cartoon panel of the famous spinach-eating strongman character. By blowing Popeye up larger than life and putting the figure on canvas, Lichtenstein made an implicit argument for the potential artistic value of something as humble as a cartoon in its ability to show the emptiness of consumerist reproductions. "The essence of Lichtenstein's procedure lay in the enlargement and unification of his source material. Lichtenstein emphasized the banality and emptiness of his motifs as an equivalent to the impersonal, mechanized style of drawing" (Busche, "Roy Lichtenstein").
The creation of supposedly high art, in other words, makes the original, popular source more banal in texture, rather than more meaningful. The visual impact was purely in terms of appearance, not because of any deeper intrinsic meaning of the image. In fact, many viewed Lichtenstein's works as also thumbing their noses at the art establishment with its demand for emotional significance and truth.
Another notable figure in the Pop Art movement was Andy Warhol. Warhol began his career in advertising, and this is starkly manifest in his designs. Having an advertising rather than a conventional art background, his first groundbreaking designs involved depictions of Brillo pads and Campbell's soup cans. It has been said: "the essence of Warhol's genius was to eliminate the one aspect of a thing without which that thing would, to conventional ways of thinking, cease to be itself, and then to see what happened" (Menand, "Top of the Pops"). Warhol's works effectively functioned as advertisements without being advertisements. He also favored representations of celebrities spanning from Marilyn Monroe to Mao, with their infamous images printed and reprinted again and again in different colors to show the commodification of celebrity personas and effectively render such images of supposedly real people into advertising-like copy.
Warhol more explicitly than Lichtenstein questioned notions of what constituted high art by bringing the commercial and the prefabricated into museums. The soup cans and his celebrity portraits were deliberately manufactured, unartistic, and the same; yet their very repetition conveyed meaning via Warhol's silk-screened, exact reproductions of their labels. "Warhol's repeated image of a mass-produced consumer good was itself produced in a standardized format in some ways more standardized than an actual advertisement which might show the product in different live contexts" ("Andy Warhol," The Art Story). "He began by projecting a source image onto canvas, then he traced the image repeatedly, creating a two-dimensional graphic aesthetic" ("Andy Warhol," The Art Story).
Warhol later made forays into film and other media, denying the notion that artists needed to be confined to any specific classification. "Challenging the idealist visions and personal emotions conveyed by abstraction, Warhol embraced popular culture and commercial processes to produce work that appealed to the general public" ("Andy Warhol," The Art Story). He focused on experimental films as well as paintings and sculptures, denying that art needed to be confined within a museum or even walls.
"Kruger harnesses appropriation for feminist social critique"
"Pop artists fundamentally redefine artistic purpose and scope"
You’re 74% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.