This paper examines the growing prevalence of professional athletes fathering children out of wedlock and evaluates the moral implications through a Kantian ethical framework. Drawing on statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics and accounts from sports agents, attorneys, and broadcasters, the paper argues that the rate of out-of-wedlock births among professional athletes significantly exceeds already-high national averages. It traces the negative consequences for athletes' performance, team cohesion, and — most critically — the children themselves. Applying Kant's Categorical Imperative, the paper concludes that the actions of both athletes and the mothers involved constitute treating persons merely as means to an end, rendering such conduct morally impermissible.
The paper demonstrates applied ethics methodology: it first establishes empirical context (statistics, case studies), then introduces the theoretical framework (Kant's Categorical Imperative and the means/ends distinction), and finally applies that framework systematically to each affected party. This "establish facts, introduce theory, apply theory" structure is a foundational technique in applied ethics writing and shows how abstract philosophical principles can evaluate real-world conduct.
The paper opens with a brief introduction identifying the problem and thesis. Two body sections establish the factual landscape — prevalence among athletes versus broader society, and documented effects on performance and team dynamics. The analytical core then introduces Kantian ethics and applies the Categorical Imperative to athletes, mothers, children, and teammates in turn. A short conclusion synthesizes the moral verdict and invokes athletes' responsibilities as public role models.
There are a variety of problems that plague today's sports industry. The use of performance-enhancing drugs by athletes has been a continual challenge across many sports, as has the use of recreational drugs. However, one often-overlooked predicament is the occurrence of children born out of wedlock by athletes, and the negative effects this has not only on the athlete and the team, but on the child as well. Because of the detrimental effects on all parties involved, and using Kantian morality as an ethical framework, this paper argues that athletes having children out of wedlock is an immoral decision.
"Nearly one-third of all children in this country are born to unwed mothers. Among professional athletes, out-of-wedlock births are epidemic" (Crane).
One top agent estimates that there are more out-of-wedlock children than there are players in the NBA, and notes that he spends more time handling paternity claims than he does negotiating contracts for his players (qtd. in Wahl & Wertheim). Of course, it is not just a problem for the NBA; other sports are affected as well. Athletes from a variety of sports — including Oscar de la Hoya, Andre Rison, Steve Garvey, Alonzo Spellman, Jim Palmer, Pete Rose, and others — have all been subjected to paternity suits for children they fathered out of wedlock.
What is perhaps most surprising is that most of these paternity suits never become general public knowledge. Wahl and Wertheim quote Gloria Allred, a prominent Los Angeles family law attorney who has represented dozens of mothers in paternity suits against athletes. She notes that approximately 90% of athlete-related paternity cases never make it to court; instead, they are settled quietly before they can become public record. The authors found similar views expressed by more than ten other lawyers who have also worked on paternity cases against athletes.
According to a survey conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, in 1995, 32% of all American children were born to unmarried mothers — a startling increase over the 18% reported in 1980. However, is the high rate of out-of-wedlock births by professional athletes really just a reflection of this disturbing societal trend? When one considers the statistics offered by sports professionals, it becomes clear that athletes have a significantly higher proportion of out-of-wedlock children than their non-athlete counterparts.
Len Elmore, an ESPN broadcaster and former NBA player, estimates that there is approximately one out-of-wedlock child for every player in the NBA. Although he notes that some players have none, others have two or three (Wahl & Wertheim). Examples include Larry Johnson of the Knicks, who had three out-of-wedlock children in addition to the two he had with his wife, and Shawn Kemp of the Cavaliers, who had seven children but had never been married (Crane). If these figures are accurate, they represent a rate of out-of-wedlock births far exceeding the already-troubling national rate of 32%.
In the end, the epidemic of out-of-wedlock children fathered by professional athletes is a serious concern. These athletes, whether they like it or not, are role models to the youth of today, and as such they need to be especially concerned with the moral implications of their actions. By applying Kantian morality, one can see clearly that at no point is having an out-of-wedlock child a moral decision. From conception — when the mother-to-be is used as a means for the ends of sexual gratification — to the lack of consideration for the stress that paternity suits will place on the team, to the complete disregard for the child who had no voice in the decision whatsoever and relied on both parents to act in the child's best interest, each step in the process is fraught with moral failure.
You’re 38% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.