KBR Australia Knowledge Management Succession Strategy
This paper examines KBR Australia's knowledge management (KM) and succession planning strategy following the company's separation from Halliburton in 2007. Drawing on frameworks for high performance organizations, the paper evaluates KBR's existing training categories, career-path-based succession model, and transferable competencies across technical and managerial domains. It identifies gaps in the current strategy and recommends incorporating a formal talent management plan — including workforce profiling, demand forecasting, and external labor supply analysis — to better align human resource development with organizational needs. The analysis applies theory from Bagorogoza and Waal (2010) and Banham, McDonald, and Wisner (2007) to propose a more competitive and sustainable KM succession framework.
- Introduction to KBR Australia and Its Knowledge Management Strategy: Background on KBR and its 2007 KM policy
- High Performance Organizations and KM Theory: Academic frameworks linking KM to high performance
- Technical Knowledge Transfer and Intellectual Capital: Applying KM theory to KBR's engineering knowledge needs
- Job-Level Succession Planning and Career Path Framework: KBR's five job-level succession and training structure
- Talent Management and Workforce Planning Recommendations: Proposed talent management and demand forecasting additions
- Conclusion: Summary of findings and strategic recommendations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its recommendations in established academic theory, specifically Bagorogoza and Waal's (2010) KM framework, providing a credible analytical foundation rather than relying solely on description.
- It moves logically from describing the existing KBR strategy to identifying its limitations, then proposing concrete improvements — giving the argument a clear problem-solution structure.
- The inclusion of empirical detail, such as the 10.7% increase in employee training hours between 2005 and 2006, supports claims with data and demonstrates evidence-based reasoning.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theory analysis: taking academic frameworks (high performance organizations, talent management) and systematically applying them to a real organizational case. Rather than summarizing theory in isolation, the writer uses it as a diagnostic lens to evaluate KBR's strategy and identify specific gaps, which is a hallmark of upper-undergraduate business analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with organizational background, then introduces the theoretical KM framework, applies it to KBR's technical and managerial knowledge needs, analyzes the existing job-level succession model, and closes with talent management recommendations. Each section builds on the previous, moving from description to theory to application to prescription — a clear and effective academic structure for a strategic management paper.
Introduction to KBR Australia and Its Knowledge Management Strategy
Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR) is an international company founded by Brown and Root in 1960 as Kinhill Engineers, and has undergone various changes over the years. A significant chapter in its history occurred in 2007, when it was split from Halliburton to become a fully independent company. KBR's Australian division has offices in Melbourne, Adelaide, Canberra, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, Gold Coast, and various project offices. This network is served by over 2,000 employees and more than 370 active contractors. The company is a major engineering services and construction firm offering support to the energy, hydrocarbon, government, and civil infrastructure sectors (Halliburton Corporate Sustainability Report, 2006). The focus of this paper is the company's knowledge management (KM) and succession planning strategy.
This analysis is necessary because KBR's KM strategy was redesigned in 2006, following its separation from Halliburton. The policy was implemented in 2007 and was designed to establish criteria for ensuring the transfer of knowledge and the planning of local succession (Halliburton Corporate Sustainability Report, 2006). The current KM and succession strategy is based on this policy, which also describes the creation of new multipurpose facilities for managerial and technical training. Training is offered in five categories: technical excellence focus, location-based, internal, online KBR training, and lunch-and-learn sessions. A survey carried out by the Energy Services Group in 2006 showed that employee training hours had increased by 10.7% in 2006 compared to 2005, following the inception of the program (as indicated in Table 3, Appendix I).
In addition, the company identified a need to develop strong, innovative leaders for its future success by creating the President's Leadership Excellence Program (Halliburton Corporate Sustainability Report, 2006). The succession strategy entails clearly defined career paths, which management uses alongside performance management initiatives to expand employee retention programs. The goal of this succession strategy is to encourage goal setting and gauge competitive compensation and progress among employees (Halliburton Corporate Sustainability Report, 2006).
References
Bagorogoza, J. & Waal, A. de (2010). The role of knowledge management in creating and sustaining high performance organizations: The case of financial institutions in Uganda. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 6(4), 307–324.
Banham, H. C., McDonald, J., & Wisner, R. (2007). Australian small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs): A study of high performance management practices. Journal of Management and Organization, 13(3), 227–248.
Halliburton Corporate Sustainability Report. (2006). Corporate sustainability report 2006. Halliburton.
Vaibhav, G. (2010). The process of human resource planning. GRIN Publishing GmbH.
Appendix I
Table 3: Employee Training in Millions of Hours
Year: 2004 — Employee training hours: 1.75 million
Year: 2005 — Employee training hours: 1.97 million
Year: 2006 — Employee training hours: 2.18 million
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.