Portraits: Kimmelman's Conversations With Modern Artists
This paper reviews Michael Kimmelman's 1998 book Portraits: Talking With Artists at the Met, the Modern, the Louvre, and Elsewhere, in which the New York Times art critic interviews eighteen prominent modern and contemporary artists in front of works at major museums. The review examines how Kimmelman's conversational method reveals unexpected artistic inspirations — such as Francis Bacon's debt to Romanticism and Roy Lichtenstein's admiration for Van Gogh — while challenging the institutional tendency to segment art into rigid categories. The paper also highlights the book's central argument: that artistic freedom depends on a rigorous command of craft and that contemporary art represents a reconfiguration, rather than a rejection, of artistic tradition.
- Introduction: Art in Words: Challenge of translating visual art into language
- Kimmelman's Method and the Book's Scope: Interview technique and book's historical value
- Breaking Down Artistic Categories: How artist choices challenge modern vs. traditional labels
- Unexpected Inspirations Across Movements: Bacon, Lichtenstein, and surprising artistic influences
- Craft, Discipline, and the Paradox of Modern Art: Why mastery of rules enables artistic freedom
- Conclusion: Dialogue Between Past and Present: Contemporary art as reconfiguration, not rejection
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses specific, vivid examples from the book — Chuck Close's adaptation to disability, Bacon's choice of the V&A, Lichtenstein's love of Van Gogh — to ground abstract claims about art history and criticism.
- Builds a coherent interpretive argument across a short review: that Kimmelman's method exposes institutional art categorization as artificial and that all serious artists share a commitment to craft.
- Maintains an engaging, readable tone without sacrificing analytical precision, appropriate for an arts review at the undergraduate level.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses the book review format to synthesize evidence from multiple chapters into a single unifying thesis. Rather than summarizing each interview sequentially, it selects representative examples (Close, Bacon, Lichtenstein, Balthus, Marden) to build a cumulative argument about artistic tradition and freedom. This approach models how to move from textual evidence to interpretive claim without over-summarizing the source.
Structure breakdown
The review opens by contextualizing the challenge of writing about art, then introduces Kimmelman's interview method and its rationale. Subsequent paragraphs examine specific artists to challenge the modern/traditional divide. The final substantive section distills the book's central paradox — that discipline enables creative freedom — before the conclusion frames contemporary art as productive dialogue rather than rupture with the past.
Introduction: Art in Words
Attempting to put art into words can be like trying to capture lightning in a bottle: art often seems to defy description, however earnestly critics attempt to do so. Even artists themselves frequently struggle with articulating the concepts behind their works. Various attempts over the years have been made to render art — particularly abstract modern art — more intelligible, including the famous effort to film Jackson Pollock painting one of his celebrated "drip" paintings from below the surface of a piece of glass. In the book Portraits: Talking With Artists at the Met, the Modern, the Louvre, and Elsewhere, New York Times art critic Michael Kimmelman adopts a different technique: he asks prominent modern artists to talk about art while standing in front of paintings and photographs at various museums. He invites them to discuss not only their own work, but also the art of others that inspired them.
Kimmelman's Method and the Book's Scope
By using this technique, Kimmelman creates a broad and far-reaching portrait of what high-quality modern art entails. Even highly abstract artists, it turns out, can be inspired by representational works. Categories of art — such as "modern" versus "traditional" — are never absolute. First published in 1998, the book also functions as a historical treasure trove, preserving the thoughts of many older artists, such as the Polish-French painter Balthus, whose reflections on their craft near the end of their lives might not have survived had Kimmelman not taken the time to record them for posterity.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.