This paper examines knowledge management (KM) through a case study of Toyota, focusing on the company's 2010 product recall crisis in which eight popular car models were suspended due to faulty accelerators. Using four major KM models outlined by Dalkir (2005) — the Von Krogh and Roos model, the Nonaka and Takeuchi Knowledge Spiral, the Choo and Weik model, and the Wiig model — the paper analyzes three interconnected themes: the knowledge worker, organizational development, and knowledge exchange. The paper argues that Toyota's failure stemmed from a breakdown in internal communication and knowledge transfer, and explores how reapplying KM principles could help the company restore its reputation and prevent future crises.
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis: it introduces multiple competing frameworks (Von Krogh and Roos, Nonaka and Takeuchi, Choo and Weik, and Wiig), identifies shared themes across them, and then systematically applies those themes to a specific organizational failure. This technique — extracting cross-model themes before application — is a strong graduate-level strategy for synthesizing a fragmented literature.
The paper opens with a definition of knowledge management and frames three diagnostic questions about Toyota's crisis. A background section establishes the historical and financial context of the recall. A model comparison table precedes three thematic analytical sections (the knowledge worker, organizational development, and knowledge exchange), each linking Toyota's practices to specific KM principles. The conclusion briefly synthesizes findings and projects a cautiously optimistic outlook. An annotated bibliography and a 14-principle appendix round out the paper.
A knowledge management system is capable of making comparisons, analyzing trends, and presenting historical and current knowledge. More importantly, such a system enables decision makers to analyze patterns quickly and identify the most significant trends. It is needed in an enterprise because it provides an accurate predictive method for decision makers. In addition, a knowledge management system can track and evaluate key critical success factors, which is valuable in assessing whether the organization is meeting its corporate objectives and goals. Overall, a knowledge management system can assist decision makers in making better-informed decisions that affect all aspects of a company's operations (Dalkir, 2005).
Toyota allegedly had just such a system in place. However, there was clearly a major flaw in the system early in 2010, which resulted in safety issues that led to negative publicity, a tarnished reputation, and the suspension of eight of its most popular car models. So what happened at Toyota, and what could have been done differently? Perhaps more importantly, what can Toyota do now to prevent similar problems in the future? These are the questions this paper will attempt to answer and analyze.
For decades, the quality of leadership and innovation in the automobile industry has been equated with Japan. Even in light of massively funded campaigns urging U.S. citizens to "Buy American," American automakers have long been criticized as inferior to their Japanese counterparts. However, Toyota's recent troubles cast a new light on the situation, causing many people to rethink the trust they had placed in the Japanese automaker. In January 2010, Toyota was forced to recall eight models and stop selling them because of a faulty accelerator that had the potential of sticking when depressed — an obvious and serious safety hazard. This debacle cost Toyota money, prestige, and consumer trust. Although the company posted a $1.7 billion profit for the fourth quarter of 2009, "the suspension of U.S. sales of eight of its most popular models and repair costs are expected to undermine earnings in the current quarter" ("Toyota Posts," 2010, par. 3).
Toyota has been praised for its Toyota Production System (TPS) strategy for decades. The company operates on 14 principles, which are outlined in the Appendix. Many of these principles are rooted in the concepts of knowledge management. For example, Principle 9 reads: "Grow leaders who thoroughly understand the work, live the philosophy, and teach it to others"; and Principle 14 reads: "Become a learning organization through relentless reflection (hansei) and continuous improvement (kaizen)." Toyota certainly seemed to be on the right track in its organizational strategies, yet somewhere along the line something went off the rails. By applying various models of knowledge management (KM) as outlined by Dalkir (2005), it may be possible to determine where Toyota went wrong and what the company can do to get itself back on track.
The following table briefly compares the four primary KM models discussed in Dalkir's (2005) Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice:
Von Krogh and Roos KM Model: Knowledge management is both an individual and interaction-oriented strategy. The model adopts a "connectionist" approach — "Everything known is known by somebody" (Dalkir, 2005, p. 51). It promotes group sharing of knowledge and provides a solid connectionist framework, though it is inflexible in perceiving knowledge as abstract.
Nonaka and Takeuchi Knowledge Spiral Model: Metaphors, slogans, and symbols spur organizational innovation. Everything is connected and part of a larger entity, so knowledge is "group knowledge"; however, "knowledge creation begins with the individual" (Dalkir, 2005, p. 52). This model provides a well-established framework for knowledge conversion between explicit and tacit knowledge, though its eight emergent characteristics for company survival are considered vague and generic.
Choo and Weik Model: Sense-making is imperative for knowledge creation and effective decision-making. The model provides a viable explanation of how chaos turns to order, though as a holistic model it does not account for abstract interactions.
Wiig Model: "In order for information to be useful and valuable, it must be organized" (Dalkir, 2005, p. 61). Completeness, connectedness, congruency, and perspective/purpose are the model's four primary dimensions. It emphasizes the importance of the individual knowledge worker, though the perspective and purpose dimension requires further development.
In analyzing Toyota from a KM perspective, it is important to apply these models and their various aspects. Three themes that appear frequently across all of these models are: (1) the knowledge worker; (2) organizational development; and (3) knowledge exchange.
A great deal is being said and written about the knowledge worker of today — about a workplace populated by workers who constantly shift among employers, are continually being retrained, or must upgrade their skills independently. Although much of this is true, the popular view tends to treat the new workforce as a one-dimensional entity and obscures the subtleties and complex demands of the modern work world. According to Davenport (2005), "knowledge workers have high degrees of expertise, education, or experience, and the primary purpose of their jobs involves the creation, distribution, or application of knowledge" (p. 10). From this perspective, stability and long-term dedication to a learning process are imperative. It is therefore difficult to view the knowledge worker as transient or ephemeral, despite the notion that many may expect to stay with a company only as long as it takes to enhance their marketability and boost their salary. Ultimately, a true knowledge worker wants to use what they have learned for the betterment of the organization that has fostered that learning.
Knowledge workers thrive on change, but that does not mean they need to switch employers every few years. It simply means they need to apply their knowledge to a variety of scenarios within their chosen workplace. Change is, of course, a major component of learning. In Handy's (1985) view, change can be described as another word for learning; organizations that undergo cultural change can be described as going through the learning process. Handy explains that a learning organization has two meanings: it can mean an organization that learns, and it can mean an organization that encourages learning in its people. Either way, this "learning mindset" should ideally foster successful organizational development.
A true knowledge worker is one who has a long-term commitment to their field, their organization, and to learning in general. Such a worker is dedicated to applying continuously acquired knowledge to their present environment because that is where it will be most beneficial. They also feel a sense of loyalty to their organization and feel duty-bound to contribute more to the organizational knowledge bank than they have drawn from it (Lord & Brown, 2001).
According to DeTienne et al. (2004), Chief Knowledge Officers (CKOs) must interact with the organizational culture in such a way that "human barriers associated with knowledge creation, transfer and sharing" can be overcome. Despite the inherent ambiguity of the CKO's role, "Chief Knowledge Officers are at the heart of KM processes" and must therefore be adequately prepared to meet the changing goals and functions of the modern organization.
Working in automobile manufacturing requires a level of critical thinking for the knowledge worker that extends beyond that of many other fields. Because automotive technology changes so rapidly, new knowledge constantly makes old knowledge obsolete. For this reason, leaders in the field have come to understand that becoming a knowledge worker in the true sense of the term requires flexibility, adaptability, and strong critical thinking skills (Lawler, 2005).
An example of how Toyota has promoted the idea of the knowledge worker can be seen in its use of simulations and assessments as training approaches in its e-learning programs. Toyota has employed simulations as a means of providing workers with hands-on instruction in the soft skills needed for conducting sales activities. The training program was developed on the philosophy that content must be relevant, instruction must be learner-driven, and training must be convenient and cost-effective (Kelly & Nanjiani, 2005).
The training system allows workers to access a module-based platform that provides instruction and hands-on experience in preparing sales presentations, creating project plans, and developing problem-solving skills. Simulations based on real-life scenarios are used as training and assessment tools in customer service, business management, sales, and other areas aligned with Toyota's organizational goals, culture, and work environment. The program provides a safe learning environment where workers can receive personal assessment and targeted instruction. The implementation of simulation-based training has increased worker performance and productivity (Kelly & Nanjiani, 2005).
To maintain program quality and keep materials current, Toyota outsources content creation and maintenance of the content library at a significantly lower cost than would be required if the training program were managed entirely in-house. This approach has resulted in a successful just-in-time, learner-driven training program that uses scenario-based simulations to provide low-cost training that workers can access when and where it is needed (Kelly & Nanjiani, 2005). This is an example of how Toyota has traditionally adhered to its fourteen principles and worked to maintain an organization in which knowledge management is paramount.
Toyota is an organization that has traditionally been known for its innovation, its forward thinking, and its effective knowledge management systems. The major setback it experienced in early 2010 — recalling eight of its most popular car models due to safety issues — is notably out of character for this industry leader. However, just because Toyota is "down" does not mean it is "out." By working to apply the theories and models of knowledge management, ensuring there are no further breakdowns in communication within the organization, Toyota is still likely to have a bright future ahead.
You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.