Procter & Gamble Strategy and BCG Matrix Analysis

Introduction

Procter & Gamble (P&G), one of the largest creators of consumer products in the world, is constantly seeking to improve its market share and consumer base. With global markets becoming more integrated and countries increasingly opening their economies, P&G is constantly looking for new strategies that can provide it with a competitive edge. This study identifies some of the challenges as well as the opportunities available to the company. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) model helps identify which P&G products are cash cows and which have not performed as well in the market.

Understanding the factors that affect product sales and market capture can help P&G identify the best road map for managing its different product lines. Consumer goods sales are also dependent on the level of marketing and advertising employed. The fierce competition that exists for similar products makes product substitution easy if the customer is not satisfied. Establishing brand image and reputation takes time; recognizing that a happy customer will be a repeat customer for life is critical. Many cash cow products — such as Tide, Bounty, and Charmin — enjoy loyal support in almost every market in which they are available.

P&G has competitors in all markets in which it operates. Many competitors support similar product lines, and product differentiation ultimately defines the advantage the company can enjoy. P&G can control the internal factors within the organization and modify them to best serve the market and the customer. Managing external factors, however, can be more challenging. In the age of globalization and multinational corporations, local cultures, beliefs, and norms play an important role in establishing the image of the company within any given market.

Procter & Gamble, considered the biggest consumer goods company in the world, is the subject of this analysis. P&G is renowned for its ability to market products while simultaneously building brand recognition. The company has been able to build brand names that gain recognition in every market in which its products are used. Currently, P&G markets over 300 branded products in more than 160 countries around the world. The company is the number one U.S. consumer manufacturer and ranks among the top three consumer producers anywhere in the world.

The company has three major categories of products: global beauty care; global health, baby, and family care; and global household care. Some of the company's major billion-dollar brands include Actonel, Always/Whisper, Ariel, Bounty, Charmin, Crest, Downy/Lenor, Folgers, Head & Shoulders, Iams, Olay, Pampers, Pantene, Pringles, Tide, and Wella. In 2001, P&G purchased Clairol. In 2005, the company moved to acquire Gillette, a former rival and significant player in the consumer product industry (Yahoo.com, 2005).

Discussion: Market Environment and Strategy

P&G has adopted a new trend that is revolutionizing the consumer product industry. By leading a strategy to reinvigorate established brands by placing them inside innovative new delivery devices, the company has been able to improve brand image while simultaneously boosting pricing on the products being sold (Berner and Symonds, 2005). S.C. Johnson & Sons, Kimberly-Clark Corp, Unilever Group, and Colgate-Palmolive are among P&G's chief industry rivals. P&G competes with these companies in almost all the markets in which it operates, and it is committed to researching and developing new products in order to maintain its position as market leader.

Most P&G products traditionally targeted women — home products, cleaning supplies, and beauty products. By purchasing Gillette, however, the company now also has an extensive range of products targeting the male consumer. By diversifying into new products and markets, the company constantly ensures it has the necessary product range to attract new customers. Any consumer product company is greatly affected by the macro- and microenvironments of the industry and market in which it operates. There are many factors and variables, both dependent and independent, that affect strategies and, consequently, the sales of any product in the market (Kotler and Armstrong, 2001). Many external factors may be common to all markets, while a few may be specific to a local or regional market. The ability of any company to understand these external factors and use that knowledge to attain marketing success is critical in the current environment.

In recent times, most companies have grown as a result of mergers and acquisitions of related or unrelated organizations. Chandler observed this trend of growth through mergers and acquisitions as far back as the turn of the 20th century in organizations such as Sears and DuPont (Pearce and Robinson, 2003).

P&G, when establishing manufacturing plants in regional markets, selects countries that enjoy political stability and possess the infrastructure and logistical capabilities for business. Depending on the stability of the market and the purchasing power of the population, the company markets different brands to satisfy local needs. Brands are also marketed based on the specific culture and values of the region. For example, the infrastructure for logistics and transportation is well developed in countries like the United States and Western Europe; however, countries such as Russia and the Eastern Bloc nations, which are still developing their market infrastructure, face these challenges.

Cultures and societies also play an important role in the way products are accepted in the market. Some societies — such as those of the United States and Western Europe — place great emphasis on clean and sanitized homes and constantly search for products that provide these features. Other societies may use indigenous products to satisfy these needs and may be less likely to purchase a commercial product. Increasing the company's position in these new markets requires the ability to effectively create the need for these products within the local population.

The company actively investigates the use of technology for reducing product or process failures, improving packaging and distribution networks, and optimizing facility production. Technology required for the consumer product market has also been evolving, keeping pace with developments in the manufacturing sector overall. The volume and scope of this market ensure that even small savings or efficiency gains can significantly impact overall profitability. In more advanced markets, P&G constantly invests in research and development to ensure that product upgrades and improvements are well received. P&G has also helped small manufacturers develop devices that can be used in conjunction with its products, entering into profit-sharing arrangements. Profits on these devices have helped the company offset some of the cost of rising raw materials (Berner and Symonds, 2005).

References

Ansoff, H.I. "Strategies for Diversification." Harvard Business Review 35.5 (1957): 113–24.

Berner, Robert, and William C. Symonds. "Welcome to Procter & Gadget." Business Week 2005: 76–77.

Chandler, Alfred Dupont. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1962.

Chuang, Shin-Chieh, and Chia-Ching Tsai. "The Impact of Consumer Product Knowledge on the Effect of Terminology in Advertising." Journal of American Academy of Business 7.1 (2005): 223.

COMTEX. Procter & Gamble to Buy Gillette Co. in $57-Billion US Stock Deal. 2005. The Canadian Press.

Court, David, and Sandeep Dayal. "Beyond Behavioral Bounds." Marketing Management 11.5 (2002): 28–32.

Drucker, Peter Ferdinand. The Practice of Management. 1st ed. New York: Harper, 1954.

Ghemawat, Pankaj. "Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective." Business History Review 76 (Spring 2002): 37–74.

Grace, Audrey, and Tom Butler. "Beyond Knowledge Management: Introducing Learning Management Systems." Journal of Cases on Information Technology 7.1 (2005): 53–70.

Guen, Tim. Oops, I Did It Again. 2001.

Karlsen, Jan Terje, and Petter Gottschalk. "Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer in IT Projects." Engineering Management Journal 16.1 (2004): 3–10.

Knowledge-futures. Open Innovation at Procter & Gamble and the Birth of the Crest Spinbrush. 2003.

Kotler, Philip, and Gary Armstrong. Principles of Marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001.

Levinson, Jay Conrad. Guerrilla Advertising: Cost-Effective Techniques for Small-Business Success. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1994.

Miskell, Peter. "Rising Tide: Lessons from 165 Years of Brand Building at Procter and Gamble." Business History Review 78.3 (2004): 559–61.

Morgan, Gareth. Images of Organization. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.

NetMBA. The BCG Growth-Share Matrix. 2005.

Pearce, John A., and Richard B. Robinson. Strategic Management: Formulation, Implementation, and Control. 8th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2003.

Sutel, Seth. P&G to Acquire Gillette for $57 Billion. 2005.

Tellis, Gerard J. Effective Advertising: Understanding When, How, and Why Advertising Works. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004.

Yahoo.com. Profile — Procter & Gamble Co. 2005. Yahoo Finance.