Lazarus Appraisal Theory: How We Interpret Emotions
This paper examines Richard S. Lazarus's Appraisal Theory, which holds that emotional reactions are shaped not by events themselves but by individuals' personal interpretations of those events. The paper introduces the theory's core premise, illustrates it with a social example involving a first date, and then explains why the theory works by detailing its six appraisal components — two primary appraisals (motivational relevance and motivational congruence/incongruence) and four secondary appraisals (accountability, problem-focused coping potential, emotion-focused coping potential, and future expectations). Together, these components determine both the valence and intensity of emotional experience and guide how individuals cope with emotionally significant situations.
- Introduction to Appraisal Theory: Definition and historical background of the theory
- A Social Example: The First Date: Concrete illustration of appraisals shaping emotion
- Why Appraisal Theory Works: Emotion as meaning-making, not situational reflex
- Primary Appraisals: Relevance and Congruence: Two core appraisals governing emotional valence
- Secondary Appraisals and Coping: Four appraisals defining coping and accountability
- Conclusion: Emotion-focused coping and future expectation appraisal
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds an abstract psychological theory in a relatable, everyday example (a first date), making the concepts immediately accessible to a general academic audience.
- It maintains a clear logical progression — definition, illustration, mechanism — that mirrors standard expository structure in psychology writing.
- Multiple scholarly sources are integrated to support each theoretical claim, demonstrating awareness of the literature rather than relying on a single authority.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses the technique of concept scaffolding: it introduces Appraisal Theory at a general level, anchors comprehension with a concrete example, and then unpacks its internal architecture (primary and secondary appraisals) layer by layer. This builds understanding incrementally, which is effective for communicating multi-component psychological models.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definition and historical context for Appraisal Theory, then applies it to a social scenario. The bulk of the paper systematically explains the two primary appraisals and four secondary appraisals, including motivational relevance, congruence, accountability, and coping potential. The structure is largely expository and follows APA citation conventions throughout.
Introduction to Appraisal Theory
Appraisal Theory is an emotional theory that refers to the personal interpretation individuals make of an event, which then determines their emotional reactions. The most significant aspect of the theory rests on how we interpret an event — whether it is a negative or a positive occurrence — as well as our thoughts about its situational cause (Wondra & Ellsworth, 2015). The theory argues that the basis of emotional experience is directly proportional to the evaluation of a situation's interpretation, known as appraisals. According to early research, appraisal theorists were continually engaged in mapping typical emotional experiences to particular appraisal combinations (Scherer, Shorr & Johnstone, 2001). For example, Hamilton (1985) identified 15 distinct emotional labels (e.g., guilt, anger, pride, happiness) and linked them to six appraisals: certainty, intentional activity, self-other agency, situational control, anticipated effort, and pleasantness (Scherer et al., 2001; Wondra & Ellsworth, 2015).
A Social Example: The First Date
Going on a first date serves as a fitting social example of appraisal theory in action. A positive perception of the date will produce feelings of anticipation, excitement, giddiness, joy, and happiness, because the individual's appraisal of the event includes the possibility of effects that are both positive and long-term — dating, followed by an engagement that might eventually lead to marriage. From another angle, if the date yields a negative perception, the resulting emotional reaction might include fear, emptiness, sadness, or dejection (Scherer et al., 2001).
Understanding and reasoning through one's emotional reactions is significant for future appraisals. Appraisal theory draws attention to the importance of individual differences in emotional reactions to similar events, placing accountability on the person rather than the event itself.
Why Appraisal Theory Works
The link between emotion and the cognitive appraisal of an encounter is very close. Within this framework, emotional reactions are not simply a function of the situation itself or of fixed personal dispositions. Instead, emotions are evoked through a process of systematic appraisal — an analysis of both the situation and the self — in order to determine the implications for a person's well-being. Different emotions arise as specific responses to a particular person's distinctive assessment of what a situation means for his or her relationship with the environment (Orbell, Hagger, Brown & Tidy, 2004).
Conclusion
The appraisal of emotion-focused coping potential concerns psychological adjustment and the prospects for future expectations and encounters. This projects to the possibility that change may be present in the psychological or actual situation — for any reason that could transform the scenario to become either more or less congruent with one's motivational goals (Orbell et al., 2004). Together, the primary and secondary appraisals form a comprehensive framework through which individuals interpret events and generate emotional responses, underscoring Richard Lazarus's central insight that emotion is a product of meaning-making, not mere stimulus-response.
References
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2005). Social psychology (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Hamilton, V. (1985). Stress, appraisal and coping [Book review]. British Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 402.
Moos, R. H., & Swindle, R. W., Jr. (1990). Person-environment transactions and the stressor-appraisal-coping process. Psychological Inquiry, 1(1), 30.
Orbell, S., Hagger, M., Brown, V., & Tidy, J. (2004). Appraisal theory and emotional sequelae of first visit to colposcopy following an abnormal cervical screening result. British Journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 533–555.
Scherer, K. R., Shorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. Canary, NC: Oxford University Press.
Wondra, J. D., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2015). An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences. Psychological Review, 122(3), 411–428. doi:10.1037/a0039252
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.