This paper examines two prominent leadership models — Peter Drucker's eight rules for effective executives and Goffee and Jones' four qualities of inspirational leaders — and applies them to the leadership style of Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder and CEO of Facebook. The paper first outlines the key attributes of each model, then compares and contrasts their emphases on tangible versus intangible leadership qualities. It subsequently evaluates Zuckerberg's real-world decisions, such as hiring Sheryl Sandberg as COO and dropping out of university to pursue entrepreneurship, against the frameworks provided by both models. A summary table maps individual leadership behaviors to the relevant model criteria.
Leadership in public and private sector businesses is important for the growth of those organizations. In recent years, many researchers have thoroughly investigated the role of leadership in promoting business success. Researchers have also explored the common characteristics of global business leaders who have brought their organizations to new heights, and various models of effective leadership have been proposed as a result.
One major aspect of leadership being explored is the ability to inspire people and to use that inspiration to achieve outcomes that could not be reached without the complete trust of followers. While attracting followers can be difficult, and retaining them even harder, some researchers have put forward consolidated models of inspirational leadership. Two such models are those presented by Goffee and Jones (2001) and by Drucker (2004). Both models aim to identify common attributes and approaches shared by successful inspirational leaders who have demonstrated exceptional skill in building and maintaining followership in their respective professional fields.
This paper discusses both models — those presented by Drucker (2004) and Goffee and Jones (2001). The main elements of each model are outlined in the following section, followed by a comparison and contrast of the two frameworks. The paper then applies these models to internationally recognized business leader Mark Zuckerberg, examining how his leadership style aligns with the two models. A summary table maps the key leadership factors from both models to Zuckerberg's observed behaviors, and the paper concludes with a brief summary of findings.
In addition to traditionally cited leadership qualities such as energy, authority, and strategic direction, Goffee and Jones (2001) identified four additional qualities of an inspirational leader, summarized as follows.
Revealing weakness: Goffee and Jones observed that an inspirational leader is one who is willing to share or acknowledge a personal weakness. This is said to promote the human side of leadership and management. By admitting a weakness, the leader signals to followers that he or she is also human, providing a basis for genuine connection. The authors are careful to note, however, that the weakness revealed should be a non-essential one — in their words, "don't expose a weakness that others see as fatal."
Becoming a sensor: The researchers argued that developing the ability to read subtle cues and absorb information not directly addressed to the leader is an essential quality of inspirational leadership. An inspirational leader should therefore be skilled at making educated, informed judgments based on the wider environment.
Tough empathy: This quality implies that leaders should actively provide growth opportunities for their followers. As the authors state, "Real leaders empathize fiercely with their followers and care intensely about their people's work."
Being different: A leader should capitalize on what is unique about him or her, as this sets the leader apart from the crowd and gives followers a source of inspiration. Goffee and Jones (2001) built their inspirational leadership model on these four qualities: sharing weaknesses with followers, developing strong situational awareness, demonstrating genuine concern for employees through tough empathy, and maintaining a distinctive identity.
Peter F. Drucker, in his article What Makes an Effective Executive, sets out eight rules that effective leaders follow, in addition to the traditionally acknowledged qualities of strategic thinking and vision.
1. Ask what needs to be done. A true leader focuses only on what is genuinely important, disregarding what is not essential for the organization. Drucker cites Jack Welch as CEO of General Electric (GE) as an example: Welch divested all GE businesses that did not have the potential to become number one or two in their industry. A leader thus concentrates effort on what can achieve market leadership.
2. Ask what is right for the enterprise. Rather than focusing on any single stakeholder group — whether owners or employees — the leader does what is best for the organization as a whole, in terms of both progress and survival.
3. Convert knowledge into action plans. Effective leaders are action-oriented, translating knowledge and insight into concrete steps forward.
4. Own responsibility by fixing accountability. Effective leaders take clear ownership of outcomes and establish clear lines of accountability throughout the organization.
5. Take responsibility for communication. From goal-setting to needs assessment, effective executives take personal responsibility for communicating clearly with others.
6. Focus on opportunities rather than problems. Leaders are drawn more to opportunity-hunting than to problem-solving, orienting the organization toward what is possible.
7. Run productive meetings. Meetings conducted by effective leaders have clear goals and produce meaningful outcomes.
8. Think and say "we," not "I." Effective leaders prioritize the group over the individual, believing in the power of teamwork rather than personal achievement.
Goffee and Jones (2001) adopt a more tacit and informal approach to identifying the basic qualities of an inspirational leader. Their emphasis rests more on the charisma and interpersonal charm of a leader than on the concrete results that the leader is expected to deliver. This does not imply that the charismatic and inspirational leaders described by Goffee and Jones are ineffective at achieving results, but rather that their primary emphasis is on empowering others. The qualities they identify are also more intangible than tangible — sharing weaknesses and developing sensitivity to surrounding information are informal, relational qualities rather than measurable outputs.
By contrast, Drucker (2004) presents a model of effective leadership that is more focused on organizational performance than on generating followership. The eight rules Drucker presents are more tangible and objective in nature than the qualities described by Goffee and Jones (2001), and they are oriented toward measurable executive behavior and enterprise-level outcomes.
"Zuckerberg's decisions mapped to both frameworks"
"Table mapping Zuckerberg's traits to model criteria"
Business leaders do not fit into one or another leadership model exclusively. However, a careful analysis indicates that some of the key characteristics described in the two aforementioned models are present in each successful business leader. Mark Zuckerberg was assessed against the leadership qualities described by both Drucker (2004) and Goffee and Jones (2001), and the analysis revealed meaningful alignment across both frameworks.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.