This paper examines the "defining the relationship" (DTR) talk—a conversation between two individuals to clarify the nature of their romantic connection—through the lens of classical learning theories. The author applies Hull's 1943 formula (Learning × Motivation = Performance) to explain what motivates individuals to initiate a DTR, and analyzes how Pavlovian conditioning shapes emotional responses following rejection. The paper also demonstrates stimulus discrimination, showing how individuals learn to distinguish between genuine signals of romantic interest and routine acts of kindness. By grounding these interpersonal dynamics in established psychological theories, the paper illustrates how everyday relationship behaviors reflect broader principles of learning and conditioning.
Since the days of diapers and Play-Doh, romantic relationships have been prevalent throughout our lives—from cootie shots to school crushes to awkward first relationships. However, throughout college, as we approach the end of carefree adolescence and the beginning of adult responsibilities, an interesting cultural phenomenon has become increasingly apparent: the defining the relationship talk.
The defining the relationship talk, or DTR for short, is the conversation that occurs between two individuals to determine and clarify the existing relationship between them. Sometimes it is used to initiate a romantic relationship; other times, it clarifies misinterpreted actions. Regardless, the purpose of a DTR is for both parties to leave with a common understanding of the nature of their shared relationship. As with many real-life experiences, the learning phenomena and theories proposed by Hull and Pavlov are observed in the DTR.
The formula (Learning × Motivation = Performance) proposed by Hull in 1943 is perfectly illustrated in the DTR. Hull's formula states that performance of a behavior is dependent on the abilities learned by the subject as well as the motivation of the subject. In the case of a DTR, the individual initiating it already possesses the basic conversational skills and the ability for confrontation, which are necessary to have such a conversation. These communication skills are acquired through everyday social interactions, whether they are platonic or otherwise.
However, just because an individual has the knowledge to initiate a DTR does not mean they will do so—this is where the motivation portion of the equation factors in. Individuals are commonly motivated to initiate the DTR for several reasons. One reason is when one individual is interested in another and senses that these feelings are reciprocated. Another reason is when interactions between the two individuals venture into the gray area between "just friends" and "more than friends," and the initiator wants to clarify these interactions and make his or her own intentions clear.
In the specific context of DTRs, only when an individual's motivation is high enough to overcome feelings of hesitancy, uncertainty, fears of rejection, and the resulting awkwardness does performance occur. Once learning and adequate motivation are present, performance of the DTR will then occur.
Another phenomenon exemplified by the "defining the relationship" conversation is Pavlovian conditioning. Pavlovian conditioning, as discovered by Ivan Pavlov in the early 20th century, occurs when an associative connection is formed between a previously neutral stimulus and a stimulus that garners a specific response. Due to evolutionary survival mechanisms, organisms develop stronger associations more quickly with stimuli that elicit negative responses than with stimuli that evoke positive responses. Therefore, when a DTR results in a negative response—such as rejection or resulting awkwardness—both the initiator and the recipient of the DTR unconsciously undergo Pavlovian conditioning.
In the case of the initiator who hoped to pursue a relationship with the other person, the unconditioned stimulus (US) would be rejection, which elicits hurt and brokenhearted feelings—the unconditioned response (UR). The previously neutral stimulus that becomes associated with rejection would be environmental stimuli present during the DTR, such as a song playing in the background or the location where the conversation occurred. These environmental stimuli become the conditioned stimulus (CS) that elicits feelings of sadness and hurt—now a conditioned response (CR). Therefore, if a song was playing in the background at the time of the DTR, it becomes associated with the feelings of sadness and hurt elicited by the rejection. The next time the initiator hears the same song on the radio, the same feelings are elicited, and thus conditioning has occurred.
Pavlovian conditioning can also occur to the other party—the individual giving the rejection. In this case, the US and CS would be the same, but the UR and therefore the CR would be, rather than feelings of sadness and hurt, feelings of guilt and awkwardness.
"Learning to distinguish romantic signals from casual acts of kindness"
The "defining the relationship" talk is just one of many examples of learning phenomena occurring in day-to-day life. As more learning theories are developed, they are applied to common social interactions. Once seemingly irrational and inexplicable emotions and experiences can now be reasoned and predicted through psychological frameworks.
You’re 79% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.