Managers and the Employee Performance Evaluation Process
This paper examines the performance evaluation process from a managerial perspective. It explores why some managers are reluctant to conduct evaluations — including discomfort with conflict, lack of training, and concerns about subjectivity — and contrasts this with the traits that characterize effective managers. The paper also profiles a manager who struggles with the process and outlines the key elements needed to improve it. A sample evaluation form for direct reports is presented, covering criteria such as job knowledge, quality of work, productivity, communication, teamwork, problem-solving, adaptability, and professional development. The paper concludes that objective metrics, regular feedback, and training in emotional intelligence can make the performance evaluation process more effective and equitable.
- Introduction: Overview of performance evaluation challenges for managers
- Why Some Managers Dislike the Performance Evaluation Process: Reasons managers resist or struggle with evaluations
- Traits of an Effective Manager: Key characteristics of managers who evaluate well
- Profile of a Manager Struggling with the Evaluation Process: Common traits of managers who fail at evaluations
- Key Elements of a Successful Employee Evaluation Process: Steps and principles for improving the evaluation process
- Preparation and the Evaluation Form for Direct Reports: Sample criteria and structure for an evaluation form
- Conclusion: Summary of recommendations for better evaluations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Balances theoretical discussion with a practical, structured deliverable — the sample evaluation form — making abstract concepts concrete and immediately applicable.
- Uses a compare-and-contrast approach, placing the profile of an effective manager alongside the profile of one who struggles, which clarifies what good performance management actually looks like.
- Each criterion on the evaluation form is explicitly tied to organizational objectives, demonstrating an understanding that individual performance metrics must serve broader institutional goals.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper integrates peer-reviewed sources to support practical recommendations — a technique common in applied business and management writing. Citations are woven into arguments about managerial behavior (Murphy, 2020; Camilleri, 2021) rather than relegated to block summaries, which strengthens the paper's credibility and shows how scholarly evidence informs real-world HR practice.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a problem-solution arc: it opens by diagnosing the challenge (managerial reluctance and its causes), establishes a normative standard (traits of effective managers), diagnoses failure modes (the struggling manager profile), prescribes improvements (key elements and preparation steps), and concludes with a practical artifact (the evaluation form). This logical progression makes it suitable as a management decision brief or professional development resource.
Introduction
The performance evaluation is an important part of management, but managers themselves can be reluctant to perform this task. One reason is that it requires the manager to be critical of how an employee is doing. Even though metrics exist and the process should be relatively clinical, there is still a human element involved. If the performance evaluation goes well, both manager and employee can feel satisfied. If it goes poorly, hurt feelings and frustration can arise on both sides, potentially creating rancor and low morale in the workplace if left unaddressed. This paper examines this topic from multiple angles: what traits make an effective manager with regard to the evaluation process, the elements of a successful performance review, and what a well-constructed evaluation form might look like.
Why Some Managers Dislike the Performance Evaluation Process
Performance evaluations are meant to support employee development (Aguinis & Burgi-Tian, 2021). However, because they directly impact a worker's job — and therefore their livelihood — they can be riddled with anxiety for the employee and deeply uncomfortable for managers. Some managers dislike the potential for personal and professional conflict that can arise from discussing performance issues with employees (Ferguson et al., 2021). They view the process as necessary yet somewhat counterproductive in terms of building camaraderie and morale. Some managers also lack proper training in delivering feedback effectively, which puts them in a poor position when it comes to conducting evaluations.
Additionally, in fast-paced work environments, the performance evaluation can be seen as a burden — something that takes time away from tasks whose outcomes should already be apparent to everyone involved. Added to this is the belief, held by some managers, that performance evaluations are too subjective; they dislike being the ones to assign ratings or make judgments about another person's performance (Murphy, 2020). If feedback is not consistent and the evaluation process is not transparent, the entire exercise can feel arbitrary and unconvincing (Murphy, 2020). Overall, the research presents a mixed picture: some findings support the evaluation process, while others suggest it should be abandoned altogether, as Murphy (2020) argues. Nevertheless, certain traits and elements can be identified that, when combined, help a manager conduct more successful performance evaluations.
Traits of an Effective Manager
An effective manager will invariably possess strong communication skills and provide consistent, regular feedback (Camilleri, 2021). Empathy is also important, as it enables a better understanding of and respect for employees. Decisiveness supports the ability to make well-informed decisions without unnecessary delay. Flexibility is another asset, since managers who are rigid tend to cause friction, particularly when situations call for adaptation. The ability to maintain and communicate a clear vision of where the team is heading can also support the process of achieving shared goals (Camilleri, 2021). Together, these traits position a manager to conduct evaluations more effectively and with greater confidence.
Conclusion
A well-designed performance evaluation form is a tool for aligning employee performance with organizational objectives. It should help managers navigate the evaluation process more confidently, but managers should also receive training in emotional and social intelligence and in how to conduct evaluations effectively. Eliminating subjectivity and relying on objective metrics makes the process more acceptable to all parties involved. Combined with regular feedback throughout the year and genuine two-way dialogue during the review itself, these measures can make the performance management process more consistent, fair, and ultimately more successful.
References
Aguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2021). Talent management challenges during COVID-19 and beyond: Performance management to the rescue. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(3), 233–240.
Camilleri, M. A. (2021). Using the balanced scorecard as a performance management tool in higher education. Management in Education, 35(1), 10–21.
Ferguson, H., Disney, T., Warwick, L., Leigh, J., Cooner, T. S., & Beddoe, L. (2021). Hostile relationships in social work practice: Anxiety, hate and conflict in long-term work with involuntary service users. Journal of Social Work Practice, 35(1), 19–37.
Murphy, K. R. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 13–31.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.